Towards a Theory of Compassion Fatigue in Palliative Care and Oncology: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Annushkha Sinnathamby, Halah Ibrahim, Yun Ting Ong, Nila Ravindran, Darius Wei Jun Wan, Jun Hao Tan, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid, Nagavalli Somasundaram, Simon Yew Kuang Ong, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
{"title":"Towards a Theory of Compassion Fatigue in Palliative Care and Oncology: A Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"Annushkha Sinnathamby, Halah Ibrahim, Yun Ting Ong, Nila Ravindran, Darius Wei Jun Wan, Jun Hao Tan, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid, Nagavalli Somasundaram, Simon Yew Kuang Ong, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna","doi":"10.1177/10499091251315183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In their care of terminally ill patients, palliative care physicians and oncologists are increasingly predisposed to physical and emotional exhaustion, or compassion fatigue (CF). Challenges faced by physicians include complex care needs; changing practice demands, and sociocultural contextual factors. Efforts to better understand CF have, however, been limited. We propose a systematic scoping review (SSR) to determine \"What is known about theories of CF in physicians?\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by the PRISMA-based Systematic Evidence-based Approach (SEBA) methodology, our SSR comprised searches for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2023 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Wiley, CINAHL and Google Scholar databases. Both thematic and content analyses were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 10 505 titles identified, 80 articles were included. 15 current theories of CF were evaluated, leading to two key domains: theories of CF and theories related to the costs of caring. Overall, theories of CF evolved from Figley's model with gradual encompassing of moral distress, vicarious trauma and burnout, alongside the inclusion of individual characteristics, decisioning and nous in later theories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CF was found to be part of a wider cost of caring that links clinical experiences with self-concepts of personhood and identity. The Ring Theory of Personhood has been able to shed light on how physicians will respond to such experiences and is key to guiding physician support and the creation of nurturing working environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251315183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251315183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In their care of terminally ill patients, palliative care physicians and oncologists are increasingly predisposed to physical and emotional exhaustion, or compassion fatigue (CF). Challenges faced by physicians include complex care needs; changing practice demands, and sociocultural contextual factors. Efforts to better understand CF have, however, been limited. We propose a systematic scoping review (SSR) to determine "What is known about theories of CF in physicians?".

Methods: Guided by the PRISMA-based Systematic Evidence-based Approach (SEBA) methodology, our SSR comprised searches for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2023 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Wiley, CINAHL and Google Scholar databases. Both thematic and content analyses were carried out.

Results: Of the 10 505 titles identified, 80 articles were included. 15 current theories of CF were evaluated, leading to two key domains: theories of CF and theories related to the costs of caring. Overall, theories of CF evolved from Figley's model with gradual encompassing of moral distress, vicarious trauma and burnout, alongside the inclusion of individual characteristics, decisioning and nous in later theories.

Conclusion: CF was found to be part of a wider cost of caring that links clinical experiences with self-concepts of personhood and identity. The Ring Theory of Personhood has been able to shed light on how physicians will respond to such experiences and is key to guiding physician support and the creation of nurturing working environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对姑息治疗和肿瘤学的同情疲劳理论:一个系统的范围回顾。
背景:在临终病人的护理中,姑息治疗医生和肿瘤学家越来越倾向于身体和情绪疲惫,或同情疲劳(CF)。医生面临的挑战包括复杂的护理需求;不断变化的实践需求,以及社会文化背景因素。然而,更好地了解CF的努力是有限的。我们建议进行系统的范围审查(SSR),以确定“医生对CF的理论了解多少?”方法:采用基于prisma的系统性循证方法(SEBA),检索2000年1月1日至2023年12月31日在MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Wiley、CINAHL和谷歌Scholar数据库中发表的文章。进行了专题分析和内容分析。结果:在10505篇文献中,有80篇文献被纳入。评估了15种现有的CF理论,得出两个关键领域:CF理论和与护理成本相关的理论。总的来说,CF理论是从Figley的模型演变而来的,逐渐包含了道德痛苦、替代性创伤和倦怠,在后来的理论中也包含了个体特征、决策和理智。结论:CF被发现是更广泛的护理成本的一部分,它将临床经验与人格和身份的自我概念联系起来。人格环理论已经能够阐明医生将如何应对这种经历,并且是指导医生支持和创造培育工作环境的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inpatient Palliative Care and Healthcare Utilization Among Older Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia (ADRD) and High Risk of Mortality in U.S. Hospitals. End-of-Life Care of Persons with Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias. Analysis of Barriers to Medical Opioid Pain Medication Using the Japanese Version of the Barriers Questionnaire II (JBQ-II): Pharmacists and Nurses Perspective in Japan. Impact of Implementing Serious Illness Conversations Across a Comprehensive Cancer Center Using an Interdisciplinary Approach. Retrospective Analysis of the Integration of Palliative Care Into the Care of Stroke Patients Admitted to a Regional Stroke Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1