Unverified medical certifications surge amid telemedicine guideline ambiguities.

Dipen Dabhi, Yatiraj Singi, Nirmal Nagar
{"title":"Unverified medical certifications surge amid telemedicine guideline ambiguities.","authors":"Dipen Dabhi, Yatiraj Singi, Nirmal Nagar","doi":"10.20529/IJME.2024.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telemedicine technology plays a crucial role in addressing healthcare challenges, particularly in countries like India, by mitigating physician shortages, reducing patient burden and costs, and aiding in disease prevention. The term telemedicine, meaning \"healing at a distance,\" was coined in 1970 [1]. It encompasses the use of electronic, communication, and information technologies to deliver healthcare services remotely. To regulate telemedicine practice, the Government of India released telemedicine guidelines on March 25, 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic [2]. The National Medical Commission (NMC) added the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines as Appendix-5 to the Professional Conduct (Etiquette and Ethics) Regulation 2002 of the erstwhile Medical Council of India (MCI) [3]. Additionally, on June 11, 2020, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) recognised teleconsultation services for insurance claims [4], which led to a surge in telemedicine consultations and the proliferation of various apps and service providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":517372,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical ethics","volume":"IX 4","pages":"337-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2024.054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Telemedicine technology plays a crucial role in addressing healthcare challenges, particularly in countries like India, by mitigating physician shortages, reducing patient burden and costs, and aiding in disease prevention. The term telemedicine, meaning "healing at a distance," was coined in 1970 [1]. It encompasses the use of electronic, communication, and information technologies to deliver healthcare services remotely. To regulate telemedicine practice, the Government of India released telemedicine guidelines on March 25, 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic [2]. The National Medical Commission (NMC) added the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines as Appendix-5 to the Professional Conduct (Etiquette and Ethics) Regulation 2002 of the erstwhile Medical Council of India (MCI) [3]. Additionally, on June 11, 2020, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) recognised teleconsultation services for insurance claims [4], which led to a surge in telemedicine consultations and the proliferation of various apps and service providers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由于远程医疗指导方针含糊不清,未经验证的医疗认证激增。
远程医疗技术通过缓解医生短缺、减轻患者负担和成本以及协助疾病预防,在应对医疗保健挑战方面发挥着至关重要的作用,特别是在印度等国家。远程医疗这个术语,意思是“远程治疗”,是在1970年创造的。它包括使用电子、通信和信息技术来远程提供医疗保健服务。为了规范远程医疗实践,印度政府于2020年3月25日在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间发布了远程医疗指南。国家医学委员会(NMC)将《远程医疗实践指南》作为前印度医学委员会(MCI) 2002年《专业行为(礼仪和道德)条例》的附录5。此外,2020年6月11日,印度保险监管和发展局(IRDAI)认可了保险索赔的远程咨询服务,这导致了远程医疗咨询的激增以及各种应用程序和服务提供商的激增。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A typology framework for unethical medical practices under public health insurance schemes in India: Analysis of evidence over the past 12 years. Advance care planning and the ethical obligation of death literacy as a public health initiative in India. Some personal reflections on prison medical care. The healing power of the doctor-patient relationship. A quasi-experimental study of trigger films for teaching the doctor-patient relationship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1