Redefining diagnostic lesional status in temporal lobe epilepsy with artificial intelligence

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1093/brain/awaf020
Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht, Erik Kaestner, Reihaneh Hassanzadeh, Rebecca W Roth, Alexandra Parashos, Kathryn A Davis, Anto Bagić, Simon S Keller, Theodor Rüber, Travis Stoub, Heath R Pardoe, Patricia Dugan, Daniel L Drane, Anees Abrol, Vince Calhoun, Ruben I Kuzniecky, Carrie R McDonald, Leonardo Bonilha
{"title":"Redefining diagnostic lesional status in temporal lobe epilepsy with artificial intelligence","authors":"Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht, Erik Kaestner, Reihaneh Hassanzadeh, Rebecca W Roth, Alexandra Parashos, Kathryn A Davis, Anto Bagić, Simon S Keller, Theodor Rüber, Travis Stoub, Heath R Pardoe, Patricia Dugan, Daniel L Drane, Anees Abrol, Vince Calhoun, Ruben I Kuzniecky, Carrie R McDonald, Leonardo Bonilha","doi":"10.1093/brain/awaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite decades of advancements in diagnostic MRI, 30-50% of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients remain categorized as “non-lesional” (i.e., MRI negative or MRI–) based on visual assessment by human experts. MRI– patients face diagnostic uncertainty and significant delays in treatment planning. Quantitative MRI studies have demonstrated that MRI– patients often exhibit a TLE-specific pattern of temporal and limbic atrophy that may be too subtle for the human eye to detect. This signature pattern could be successfully translated into clinical use via artificial intelligence (AI) advances in computer-aided MRI interpretation, thereby improving the detection of brain “lesional” patterns associated with TLE. Here, we tested this hypothesis by employing a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) applied to a dataset of 1,178 scans from 12 different centers. 3D CNN was able to differentiate TLE from healthy controls with high accuracy (85.9% ± 2.8), significantly outperforming support vector machines based on hippocampal (74.4% ± 2.6) and whole-brain (78.3% ± 3.3) volumes. Our analysis subsequently focused on a subset of patients who achieved sustained seizure freedom post-surgery as a gold standard for confirming TLE. Importantly, MRI– patients from this cohort were accurately identified as TLE 82.7% ± 0.9 of the time, an encouraging finding since clinically these were all patients considered to be MRI– (i.e., not radiographically different than controls). The saliency maps from the CNN revealed that limbic structures, particularly medial temporal, cingulate, and orbitofrontal areas, were most influential in classification, confirming the importance of the well-established TLE signature atrophy pattern for diagnosis. Indeed, the saliency maps were similar in MRI+ and MRI– TLE groups, suggesting that even when humans cannot distinguish more subtle levels of atrophy, these MRI– patients are on the same continuum common across all TLE patients. As such, AI can identify TLE lesional patterns and AI-aided diagnosis has the potential to greatly enhance the neuroimaging diagnosis of TLE and redefine the concept of “lesional” TLE.","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite decades of advancements in diagnostic MRI, 30-50% of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients remain categorized as “non-lesional” (i.e., MRI negative or MRI–) based on visual assessment by human experts. MRI– patients face diagnostic uncertainty and significant delays in treatment planning. Quantitative MRI studies have demonstrated that MRI– patients often exhibit a TLE-specific pattern of temporal and limbic atrophy that may be too subtle for the human eye to detect. This signature pattern could be successfully translated into clinical use via artificial intelligence (AI) advances in computer-aided MRI interpretation, thereby improving the detection of brain “lesional” patterns associated with TLE. Here, we tested this hypothesis by employing a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) applied to a dataset of 1,178 scans from 12 different centers. 3D CNN was able to differentiate TLE from healthy controls with high accuracy (85.9% ± 2.8), significantly outperforming support vector machines based on hippocampal (74.4% ± 2.6) and whole-brain (78.3% ± 3.3) volumes. Our analysis subsequently focused on a subset of patients who achieved sustained seizure freedom post-surgery as a gold standard for confirming TLE. Importantly, MRI– patients from this cohort were accurately identified as TLE 82.7% ± 0.9 of the time, an encouraging finding since clinically these were all patients considered to be MRI– (i.e., not radiographically different than controls). The saliency maps from the CNN revealed that limbic structures, particularly medial temporal, cingulate, and orbitofrontal areas, were most influential in classification, confirming the importance of the well-established TLE signature atrophy pattern for diagnosis. Indeed, the saliency maps were similar in MRI+ and MRI– TLE groups, suggesting that even when humans cannot distinguish more subtle levels of atrophy, these MRI– patients are on the same continuum common across all TLE patients. As such, AI can identify TLE lesional patterns and AI-aided diagnosis has the potential to greatly enhance the neuroimaging diagnosis of TLE and redefine the concept of “lesional” TLE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用人工智能重新定义颞叶癫痫的诊断病变状态
尽管在MRI诊断方面取得了几十年的进步,但根据人类专家的视觉评估,30-50%的颞叶癫痫(TLE)患者仍被归类为“非病变”(即MRI阴性或MRI -)。MRI -患者面临诊断的不确定性和治疗计划的显著延迟。定量MRI研究表明,MRI患者通常表现出tle特异性的颞叶和边缘萎缩模式,这可能对人眼来说太微妙而无法检测到。这种特征模式可以通过计算机辅助MRI解释中的人工智能(AI)进步成功转化为临床应用,从而提高对与TLE相关的大脑“病变”模式的检测。在这里,我们通过将三维卷积神经网络(3D CNN)应用于来自12个不同中心的1178次扫描数据集来验证这一假设。3D CNN能够以较高的准确率(85.9%±2.8)区分TLE与健康对照,显著优于基于海马(74.4%±2.6)和全脑(78.3%±3.3)体积的支持向量机。我们的分析随后集中在术后实现持续癫痫无发作的患者亚组,作为确认TLE的金标准。重要的是,来自该队列的MRI -患者在82.7%±0.9%的时间内被准确地识别为TLE,这是一个令人鼓舞的发现,因为这些患者在临床上都被认为是MRI -(即,在放射学上与对照组没有不同)。CNN的显著性图显示,边缘结构,特别是内侧颞叶区、扣带区和眶额区,对分类影响最大,证实了TLE特征萎缩模式对诊断的重要性。事实上,MRI+组和MRI - TLE组的显著性图是相似的,这表明即使人类不能区分更细微的萎缩水平,这些MRI - TLE患者在所有TLE患者中都处于相同的连续统中。因此,人工智能可以识别TLE的病变模式,人工智能辅助诊断有可能极大地增强TLE的神经影像学诊断,并重新定义“病变”TLE的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Plasma phosphorylated tau217 strongly associates with memory deficits in the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum Correction to: Bidirectional gut-to-brain and brain-to-gut propagation of synucleinopathy in non-human primates. Reshaping computational neuropsychiatry beyond synaptopathy. Trigeminal nerve microstructure is linked with neuroinflammation and brainstem activity in migraine. Transthyretin variants impact blood–nerve barrier and neuroinflammation in amyloidotic neuropathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1