Decision Regret About Treatment Amongst Women With Early Breast Cancer: An Integrative Review

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1111/jan.16767
Jing Liu, Sharyn Hunter, Regina Lai Tong Lee, Jiemin Zhu, Sally Wai-Chi Chan
{"title":"Decision Regret About Treatment Amongst Women With Early Breast Cancer: An Integrative Review","authors":"Jing Liu,&nbsp;Sharyn Hunter,&nbsp;Regina Lai Tong Lee,&nbsp;Jiemin Zhu,&nbsp;Sally Wai-Chi Chan","doi":"10.1111/jan.16767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To synthesise evidence on decision regret about treatment amongst women with early breast cancer, including (1) the type of treatment related to decision regret, (2) the level of decision regret, and (3) factors associated with decision regret.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Integrative review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Studies published between January 2000 and December 2023 were searched from five online databases to provide up-to-date evidence. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The constant comparison strategy was employed for data analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 26 studies were included. Breast cancer surgery was the most frequently studied treatment in relation to decision regret amongst women with early breast cancer, while adjuvant therapies were less studied. Most studies reported low levels of decision regret, while several studies found high levels. The proportion of women reporting decision regret varied considerably from 2.5% to 69% across the included studies. Factors associated with decision regret included various socio-demographic and clinical characteristics (age, ethnicity, employment, education, health literacy, cancer stage, and treatment types), decision-making experiences (patient involvement, patient preference, accessing information, and the use of decision support tools), and mental health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Decision regret occurs in women with early breast cancer after surgery and adjuvant therapies. A variety of factors should be considered during the treatment decision-making process to minimise decision regret. More robust studies are needed to disaggregate decision regret by treatment type and to evaluate the effectiveness of decision support tools in reducing decision regret in women with early breast cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>Nurses and other healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential for decision regret related to surgery and adjuvant therapies in women with early breast cancer. The findings can help nurses and other healthcare professionals identify women at higher risk of experiencing decision regret and provide support during the treatment decision-making process to mitigate it.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>PRISMA 2020 Statement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>No patient or public contribution to this review.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"81 10","pages":"6199-6223"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16767","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To synthesise evidence on decision regret about treatment amongst women with early breast cancer, including (1) the type of treatment related to decision regret, (2) the level of decision regret, and (3) factors associated with decision regret.

Design

Integrative review.

Methods

Studies published between January 2000 and December 2023 were searched from five online databases to provide up-to-date evidence. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The constant comparison strategy was employed for data analysis.

Results

A total of 26 studies were included. Breast cancer surgery was the most frequently studied treatment in relation to decision regret amongst women with early breast cancer, while adjuvant therapies were less studied. Most studies reported low levels of decision regret, while several studies found high levels. The proportion of women reporting decision regret varied considerably from 2.5% to 69% across the included studies. Factors associated with decision regret included various socio-demographic and clinical characteristics (age, ethnicity, employment, education, health literacy, cancer stage, and treatment types), decision-making experiences (patient involvement, patient preference, accessing information, and the use of decision support tools), and mental health.

Conclusion

Decision regret occurs in women with early breast cancer after surgery and adjuvant therapies. A variety of factors should be considered during the treatment decision-making process to minimise decision regret. More robust studies are needed to disaggregate decision regret by treatment type and to evaluate the effectiveness of decision support tools in reducing decision regret in women with early breast cancer.

Impact

Nurses and other healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential for decision regret related to surgery and adjuvant therapies in women with early breast cancer. The findings can help nurses and other healthcare professionals identify women at higher risk of experiencing decision regret and provide support during the treatment decision-making process to mitigate it.

Reporting Method

PRISMA 2020 Statement.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution to this review.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期乳腺癌患者治疗决策后悔:一项综合综述
综合早期乳腺癌患者决策后悔的治疗证据,包括(1)决策后悔的治疗类型,(2)决策后悔的水平,以及(3)决策后悔的相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of LGBTQ + Healthcare Providers in Workplaces in Taiwan: A Cross‐Sectional Survey The effects of clinical learning environment and career adaptability on resilience: A mediating analysis based on a survey of nursing interns. Correlation of psychological resilience with social support and coping style in Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional study. The Mediating Role of Spirituality in Delineating the Interconnection Between Self-Efficacy and Resilience Among the Parents of Children With Newly Diagnosed Diabetes: A Community Nursing-Led Cross-Sectional Study. Men in Nursing: Let's Talk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1