Authentic Versus Simulated Patient Videos: Effect on Mental Status Examination-An Educational Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Academic Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s40596-024-02111-5
Nicolaj Mikkelsen, Esben Blaabjerg Larsen, Sidse Marie Arnfred
{"title":"Authentic Versus Simulated Patient Videos: Effect on Mental Status Examination-An Educational Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Nicolaj Mikkelsen, Esben Blaabjerg Larsen, Sidse Marie Arnfred","doi":"10.1007/s40596-024-02111-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of adding authentic patient video training to a base e-module featuring simulated patient videos, aimed at improving the mental status examination (MSE) skills of fifth-year medical students during their psychiatric rotation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 290 students, assigned to either an experimental group, the full e-learning group (Full), or an active comparator group, the limited e-learning group (Limited). The Limited group received a base e-module on MSE, while the Full group received both the base e-module and an additional module with 23 authentic patient videos. MSE accuracy was assessed digitally 1 week after each rotation through multiple-choice tests based on unseen video cases. Self-reported engagement with the modules was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 290 enrolled students, 190 completed at least one MSE test. No significant improvement in MSE accuracy was observed in the Full group compared to the Limited group (10.1 vs. 9.9; F<sub>1,188</sub>, 0.152; p = 0.7). Increased engagement with the videos, both within and across groups, did not lead to better MSE outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of authentic patient videos did not significantly enhance MSE skills compared to simulated videos within the digital-only format of the study. Engagement with the video library did not influence the outcomes. The study adds to the ongoing conversation about the efficacy of e-learning in medical education, emphasizing the need for caution when adopting e-learning approaches without integrating blended learning strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7069,"journal":{"name":"Academic Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-024-02111-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the impact of adding authentic patient video training to a base e-module featuring simulated patient videos, aimed at improving the mental status examination (MSE) skills of fifth-year medical students during their psychiatric rotation.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 290 students, assigned to either an experimental group, the full e-learning group (Full), or an active comparator group, the limited e-learning group (Limited). The Limited group received a base e-module on MSE, while the Full group received both the base e-module and an additional module with 23 authentic patient videos. MSE accuracy was assessed digitally 1 week after each rotation through multiple-choice tests based on unseen video cases. Self-reported engagement with the modules was also analyzed.

Results: Of the 290 enrolled students, 190 completed at least one MSE test. No significant improvement in MSE accuracy was observed in the Full group compared to the Limited group (10.1 vs. 9.9; F1,188, 0.152; p = 0.7). Increased engagement with the videos, both within and across groups, did not lead to better MSE outcomes.

Conclusion: The addition of authentic patient videos did not significantly enhance MSE skills compared to simulated videos within the digital-only format of the study. Engagement with the video library did not influence the outcomes. The study adds to the ongoing conversation about the efficacy of e-learning in medical education, emphasizing the need for caution when adopting e-learning approaches without integrating blended learning strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Academic Psychiatry is the international journal of the American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry, and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry publishes original, scholarly work in psychiatry and the behavioral sciences that focuses on innovative education, academic leadership, and advocacy. The scope of the journal includes work that furthers knowledge and stimulates evidence-based advances in academic psychiatry in the following domains: education and training, leadership and administration, career and professional development, ethics and professionalism, and health and well-being.
期刊最新文献
Authentic Versus Simulated Patient Videos: Effect on Mental Status Examination-An Educational Randomized Controlled Trial. Development and Implementation of a Structured and Innovative Faculty-Wide Mentorship Program for a Large Department of Psychiatry. World Psychiatry Exchange Program 2.0: Enhancing Collaborations Between Early Career Psychiatrists. Gender Differences in Self-Assessment Among Clerkship Medical Students Despite Equivalent Academic and Clinical Performance. When the Tide Recedes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1