Predictors of failure of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement: a retrospective study in a tertiary care center in the USA.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.5946/ce.2024.118
Ryan Xin, Cassandra Sanossian, Melissa Fazzari, Brandon Mui, Marouf Hossain, Jennifer Katz
{"title":"Predictors of failure of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement: a retrospective study in a tertiary care center in the USA.","authors":"Ryan Xin, Cassandra Sanossian, Melissa Fazzari, Brandon Mui, Marouf Hossain, Jennifer Katz","doi":"10.5946/ce.2024.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background /aims: </strong>Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is a common procedure used to initiate enteral feeding. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies that analyze predictors of PEG failure. This study aims to identify risk factors for failure of inpatient PEG placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted of inpatients in the Montefiore Health System who were scheduled to undergo PEG placement from 2016 to 2020 (n=1,138). Patient, endoscopist, and procedural characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics, both overall and stratified by whether the PEG was successfully placed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success rate of PEG placement was 89%. The most common indications included stroke (31%), dementia (27%), and ventilator use (24%). Patient characteristics, including body mass index (BMI) (p=0.16) and indication for PEG placement (p=0.06), were not significantly associated with PEG failure. Instead, endoscopist and procedural characteristics were found to be significant, including type of attending (p<0.001), location of case (p=0.02), and category of anesthesia (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEG placement remains a highly successful procedure. Endoscopist and procedural characteristics, not patient characteristics, were associated with PEG placement success. Notably, patient BMI and indication for PEG placement could not be used to risk stratify candidates for PEG placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10351,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background /aims: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is a common procedure used to initiate enteral feeding. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies that analyze predictors of PEG failure. This study aims to identify risk factors for failure of inpatient PEG placement.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of inpatients in the Montefiore Health System who were scheduled to undergo PEG placement from 2016 to 2020 (n=1,138). Patient, endoscopist, and procedural characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics, both overall and stratified by whether the PEG was successfully placed.

Results: The overall success rate of PEG placement was 89%. The most common indications included stroke (31%), dementia (27%), and ventilator use (24%). Patient characteristics, including body mass index (BMI) (p=0.16) and indication for PEG placement (p=0.06), were not significantly associated with PEG failure. Instead, endoscopist and procedural characteristics were found to be significant, including type of attending (p<0.001), location of case (p=0.02), and category of anesthesia (p<0.001).

Conclusions: PEG placement remains a highly successful procedure. Endoscopist and procedural characteristics, not patient characteristics, were associated with PEG placement success. Notably, patient BMI and indication for PEG placement could not be used to risk stratify candidates for PEG placement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Endoscopy
Clinical Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transforming outcomes: the pivotal role of self-expanding metal stents in right- and left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions-bridge to surgery: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Predictors of failure of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement: a retrospective study in a tertiary care center in the USA. Refractory duodenal ulcer caused by portal stent graft exposure. Remimazolam, a novel drug, for safe and effective endoscopic sedation. Comments on 'Development of colonic stent simulator using three-dimensional printing technique: a simulator development study in Korea'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1