{"title":"Post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus anti-thymocyte globulin in haploidentical stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Xuelian Jin, Yu Yang, Xinchuan Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06199-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) are mainstay prophylactic treatment options for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), widely used in haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Due to a lack of prospective studies, a number of retrospective comparisons have yielded different conclusions as to which prophylaxis regimen is superior. We performed a meta-analysis of these studies to get more informed and comprehensive decisions from clinicians. Nine studies were eligible, and a total of 1674 patients were included. The combined hazard ratio (HR), relative risk (RR), and weighted mean difference (WMD) results demonstrated that, compared with ATG, PTCy demonstrated better overall survival (OS) (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51–0.97), leukemia-free survival (LFS) (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53–0.81), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.97); faster lymphocyte reconstitution, lower risk of relapse (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53–0.9) and fungal infection (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07–0.79). However, neutrophil engraftment was delayed in the PTCy regimen group (WMD 3.29, 95% CI 2.49–4.10). No statistically significant differences were observed in the time to platelet engraftment, bacterial infection, or viral infection, including cytomegalovirus, polyomaviruses BK/JC and Epstein-Barr virus. Nor was any statistically significant difference observed in the incidences of II-IV acute-GVHD (aGVHD) (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.62–1.05), III–IV aGVHD (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.22–2.19) or severe chronic-GVHD (cGVHD) (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.51–2.88), or non-relapse mortality (NRM) outcomes (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.4–1.11). Therefore, in haploidentical transplantation, PTCy accelerates lymphocyte reconstitution, significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and fungal infection, and improves the OS, LFS and GRFS, compared with ATG, with no significant difference in the efficacy of preventing acute or severe cGVHD, or the risk of bacterial or viral infection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":"104 3","pages":"1317 - 1328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00277-025-06199-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-025-06199-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) are mainstay prophylactic treatment options for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), widely used in haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Due to a lack of prospective studies, a number of retrospective comparisons have yielded different conclusions as to which prophylaxis regimen is superior. We performed a meta-analysis of these studies to get more informed and comprehensive decisions from clinicians. Nine studies were eligible, and a total of 1674 patients were included. The combined hazard ratio (HR), relative risk (RR), and weighted mean difference (WMD) results demonstrated that, compared with ATG, PTCy demonstrated better overall survival (OS) (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51–0.97), leukemia-free survival (LFS) (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53–0.81), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.97); faster lymphocyte reconstitution, lower risk of relapse (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53–0.9) and fungal infection (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07–0.79). However, neutrophil engraftment was delayed in the PTCy regimen group (WMD 3.29, 95% CI 2.49–4.10). No statistically significant differences were observed in the time to platelet engraftment, bacterial infection, or viral infection, including cytomegalovirus, polyomaviruses BK/JC and Epstein-Barr virus. Nor was any statistically significant difference observed in the incidences of II-IV acute-GVHD (aGVHD) (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.62–1.05), III–IV aGVHD (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.22–2.19) or severe chronic-GVHD (cGVHD) (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.51–2.88), or non-relapse mortality (NRM) outcomes (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.4–1.11). Therefore, in haploidentical transplantation, PTCy accelerates lymphocyte reconstitution, significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and fungal infection, and improves the OS, LFS and GRFS, compared with ATG, with no significant difference in the efficacy of preventing acute or severe cGVHD, or the risk of bacterial or viral infection.
移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)和抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)是移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的主要预防性治疗选择,广泛用于单倍体干细胞移植。由于缺乏前瞻性研究,对于哪种预防方案更优,一些回顾性比较得出了不同的结论。我们对这些研究进行了荟萃分析,以从临床医生那里获得更全面的决策。9项研究符合条件,共纳入1674名患者。综合危险比(HR)、相对危险度(RR)和加权平均差(WMD)结果显示,与ATG相比,PTCy具有更好的总生存期(OS) (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51-0.97)、无白血病生存期(LFS) (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.81)和无gvhd /无复发生存期(GRFS) (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97);淋巴细胞重建更快,复发风险(HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.9)和真菌感染风险(RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.79)较低。然而,PTCy方案组中性粒细胞移植延迟(WMD 3.29, 95% CI 2.49-4.10)。在血小板植入时间、细菌感染或病毒感染(包括巨细胞病毒、BK/JC多瘤病毒和eb病毒)方面,差异均无统计学意义。在II-IV期急性gvhd (aGVHD) (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.62-1.05)、III-IV期aGVHD (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.22-2.19)或严重慢性gvhd (cGVHD) (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.51-2.88)或非复发死亡率(NRM)结局(HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.4-1.11)的发生率方面也没有统计学上的显著差异。因此,在单倍体移植中,PTCy与ATG相比,加速淋巴细胞重建,显著降低复发和真菌感染的风险,提高OS、LFS和GRFS,在预防急性或重度cGVHD的疗效,以及细菌或病毒感染的风险方面无显著差异。
期刊介绍:
Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.