Identification of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures as atypical femur fractures on radiology reports.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1177/02841851241313026
Hans Peter Bögl, Jörg Schilcher
{"title":"Identification of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures as atypical femur fractures on radiology reports.","authors":"Hans Peter Bögl, Jörg Schilcher","doi":"10.1177/02841851241313026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bisphosphonate-associated stress fractures, atypical femur fractures (AFF), are a rare subgroup of femoral stress fractures. Their correct and early diagnosis is imperative for appropriate treatment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the sensitivity of written radiology reports to mention radiographic features of AFF, depending on the time period and academic level of the hospital.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We used 171 patients, aged 55 years or older, who sustained an AFF between 2008 and 2010 (early period) identified through the Swedish National Patient Register and radiographic review and 104 patients identified through the Swedish Fracture Register between 2015 and 2018 (late period). Plain radiographs were extracted from 72 radiology departments in Sweden and individually re-reviewed and classified based on the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research case definition for AFF. Radiology reports were viewed for mentioning AFF or stress/insufficiency features (true positives). The number of true positives was compared with the number of false positives for both periods using non-parametric statistics and using the gold standard as reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained 98 of the possible 171 reports with 7% of true positives for the early period and 77 of the possible 104 reports with 27% true positives for the late period (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The level of improvement over time was independent of the academic level of the hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite improvements over time, written radiology reports seldom mention AFF features. Clinicians, specifically orthopedic surgeons, are encouraged to contribute to a correct and early diagnosis to tailor treatment, while awaiting improvements in radiology reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851241313026"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241313026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bisphosphonate-associated stress fractures, atypical femur fractures (AFF), are a rare subgroup of femoral stress fractures. Their correct and early diagnosis is imperative for appropriate treatment.

Purpose: To investigate the sensitivity of written radiology reports to mention radiographic features of AFF, depending on the time period and academic level of the hospital.

Material and methods: We used 171 patients, aged 55 years or older, who sustained an AFF between 2008 and 2010 (early period) identified through the Swedish National Patient Register and radiographic review and 104 patients identified through the Swedish Fracture Register between 2015 and 2018 (late period). Plain radiographs were extracted from 72 radiology departments in Sweden and individually re-reviewed and classified based on the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research case definition for AFF. Radiology reports were viewed for mentioning AFF or stress/insufficiency features (true positives). The number of true positives was compared with the number of false positives for both periods using non-parametric statistics and using the gold standard as reference.

Results: We obtained 98 of the possible 171 reports with 7% of true positives for the early period and 77 of the possible 104 reports with 27% true positives for the late period (P < 0.001). The level of improvement over time was independent of the academic level of the hospital.

Conclusion: Despite improvements over time, written radiology reports seldom mention AFF features. Clinicians, specifically orthopedic surgeons, are encouraged to contribute to a correct and early diagnosis to tailor treatment, while awaiting improvements in radiology reports.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value and efficacy of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence in glioblastomas. Influence of field strength on quantitative parameters and feature stability in the assessment of the ovaries using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. Investigating hyperostosis frontalis interna: a computed tomography analysis and predictive model for Hershkovitz classification. Prediction of postoperative disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients using CT radiomics nomogram: a multicenter study. The magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the normal anatomy and injury pattern of capsuloligamentous complex of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1