Red Breast Syndrome-Where Has It Gone?: A Systematic Review of Red Breast Syndrome Incidence Overtime.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004151
Yelissa Navarro, Nathan Makarewicz, Chandler Hinson, Kometh Thawanyarat, Janet Coleman-Belin, Phillip Loan, Suraj Modi, Rahim S Nazerali
{"title":"Red Breast Syndrome-Where Has It Gone?: A Systematic Review of Red Breast Syndrome Incidence Overtime.","authors":"Yelissa Navarro, Nathan Makarewicz, Chandler Hinson, Kometh Thawanyarat, Janet Coleman-Belin, Phillip Loan, Suraj Modi, Rahim S Nazerali","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Red breast syndrome (RBS) has been noted in past literature as a possible complication of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) with the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs). Since its first appearance in 2009, RBS has drawn growing medical attention with reported incidence ranging from 7%-9%. There has been a noted decrease in the emergence of RBS despite its inclusion among the analyzed complications in a number of studies. This systematic review aims to evaluate the trend in reported RBS incidence over time and appropriately determine an accurate incidence of RBS from reported literature since the emergence of the phenomena.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed in July 2023 that analyzed the incidence of RBS among retrospective cohort studies on complication rates of IBBR with ADM. Patient demographics, RBS incidence rates, and all-cause complications were captured. The review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines and Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria was used to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2009 to 2023, a total of 48 studies (n = 6251) met inclusion criteria of which 35 studies from 2017 to 2023 were not already included in a prior systematic review (n = 5246). The mean incidence of RBS in the unreported studies was 2.88% with a weighted mean of 3.22%. Analysis of the trend in RBS over time shows an increasing reported incidence rate from 2009 with a peak in incidence between 2016 and 2017, followed by a steady decline through 2022. Twenty-six of the studies were published from 2016 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of RBS among prior studies and systematic reviews has fluctuated significantly since its initial emergence in 2009. Reported incidence rates have been on the decline since 2018 with a true weighted incidence of 3.22% from analysis of recent reported studies. Potential causes for the decline in incidence include practice changes in ADM preparation, changes in the ADM brand used for IBBR, and improved categorization of RBS compared to cellulitis/infection. Despite more robust criteria for diagnosis, no consensus for management has yet been established.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 2","pages":"243-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Red breast syndrome (RBS) has been noted in past literature as a possible complication of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) with the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs). Since its first appearance in 2009, RBS has drawn growing medical attention with reported incidence ranging from 7%-9%. There has been a noted decrease in the emergence of RBS despite its inclusion among the analyzed complications in a number of studies. This systematic review aims to evaluate the trend in reported RBS incidence over time and appropriately determine an accurate incidence of RBS from reported literature since the emergence of the phenomena.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed in July 2023 that analyzed the incidence of RBS among retrospective cohort studies on complication rates of IBBR with ADM. Patient demographics, RBS incidence rates, and all-cause complications were captured. The review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines and Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria was used to assess study quality.

Results: From 2009 to 2023, a total of 48 studies (n = 6251) met inclusion criteria of which 35 studies from 2017 to 2023 were not already included in a prior systematic review (n = 5246). The mean incidence of RBS in the unreported studies was 2.88% with a weighted mean of 3.22%. Analysis of the trend in RBS over time shows an increasing reported incidence rate from 2009 with a peak in incidence between 2016 and 2017, followed by a steady decline through 2022. Twenty-six of the studies were published from 2016 to 2019.

Conclusions: The incidence of RBS among prior studies and systematic reviews has fluctuated significantly since its initial emergence in 2009. Reported incidence rates have been on the decline since 2018 with a true weighted incidence of 3.22% from analysis of recent reported studies. Potential causes for the decline in incidence include practice changes in ADM preparation, changes in the ADM brand used for IBBR, and improved categorization of RBS compared to cellulitis/infection. Despite more robust criteria for diagnosis, no consensus for management has yet been established.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红乳综合症——它去哪儿了?:红乳综合征长期发病率的系统回顾。
背景:在过去的文献中,红乳综合征(RBS)被认为是使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADMs)进行假体乳房重建(IBBR)的可能并发症。自2009年首次出现以来,苏格兰皇家银行引起了越来越多的医疗关注,据报道发病率在7%-9%之间。尽管在许多研究中将RBS纳入分析的并发症中,但RBS的出现已明显减少。本系统综述旨在评估报告的RBS发病率随时间的变化趋势,并从该现象出现以来的报告文献中适当确定RBS的准确发病率。方法:于2023年7月进行系统文献综述,分析IBBR合并adm并发症发生率的回顾性队列研究中RBS的发生率,包括患者人口统计学、RBS发生率和全因并发症。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行评价,并使用非随机研究的方法学指数标准评估研究质量。结果:2009 - 2023年共有48项研究(n = 6251)符合纳入标准,其中2017 - 2023年有35项研究(n = 5246)未被纳入先前的系统评价。未报道的研究中RBS的平均发病率为2.88%,加权平均值为3.22%。对苏格兰皇家银行长期趋势的分析显示,报告的发病率从2009年开始上升,2016年至2017年达到高峰,随后到2022年稳步下降。其中26项研究发表于2016年至2019年。结论:RBS自2009年首次出现以来,在既往研究和系统综述中,其发病率波动较大。自2018年以来,报告的发病率一直在下降,对最近报告的研究的分析显示,真实加权发病率为3.22%。发病率下降的潜在原因包括ADM制剂的实践改变,用于IBBR的ADM品牌的改变,以及与蜂窝织炎/感染相比,RBS分类的改进。尽管有更健全的诊断标准,但尚未建立管理共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap Reconstruction of Exposed Renal Allograft. The Silent Author: A Pilot Study Detecting AI-Assisted Writing in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Journals. The Association of Gram-Negative Bacteria With Decreased Salvage Rate in Infected Breast Implants. Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Can Prolonged Ischemia Time in Extremity Transfer Be Resolved Using an Extracorporeal Circulation Model? An Experimental Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1