Reduction Mammaplasty: Closed Suction Drains Do Not Reduce Hematoma or Seroma But Increase Infection Risk.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004153
Christopher L Kalmar, Colin G White-Dzuro, Jean W Mok, Galen Perdikis
{"title":"Reduction Mammaplasty: Closed Suction Drains Do Not Reduce Hematoma or Seroma But Increase Infection Risk.","authors":"Christopher L Kalmar, Colin G White-Dzuro, Jean W Mok, Galen Perdikis","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While there is mounting evidence that closed suction drains are not necessary, there is a paucity of literature to demonstrate that drains are harmful after breast reduction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of drains on postoperative seroma, hematoma, and infection, as well as elucidate any risk factors that may be implicated in the development of these complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all reduction mammaplasty procedures at our university medical center between 2010-2020. Pedicle type, skin incision, drain utilization, breast excision mass, sternal notch to nipple distance, and inframammary fold to nipple distance were analyzed with postoperative outcomes including hematoma, seroma, infection, dehiscence, nipple necrosis, and fat necrosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 944 female patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Median age was 39.0 years, median body mass index was 31.9 kg/m2, and median breast mass resected was 742 grams per side. Drain utilization did not significantly reduce postoperative hematoma (P = 0.196), seroma (P = 0.185), nipple necrosis (P = 0.511), or fat necrosis (P = 0.113), but drain utilization significantly increased postoperative surgical site infection (P = 0.011). Patients with breast mass removed over 1500 g had significantly higher risk of hematoma (P = 0.002), fat necrosis (P < 0.001), and nipple necrosis (P < 0.001) compared to patients with less than 1500 g removed. In patients with greater than 1500 g resected, drain utilization did not significantly decrease risk of hematoma (P = 0.086) or seroma (P = 0.497).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breast reduction greater than 1500 g per side significantly increased risk of hematoma, nipple necrosis, and fat necrosis. Drain utilization did not demonstrate any advantageous effects, rather it increased risk of infection. Future multicenter study will be needed to confirm these findings across different patient referral networks and practice patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 2","pages":"152-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While there is mounting evidence that closed suction drains are not necessary, there is a paucity of literature to demonstrate that drains are harmful after breast reduction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of drains on postoperative seroma, hematoma, and infection, as well as elucidate any risk factors that may be implicated in the development of these complications.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all reduction mammaplasty procedures at our university medical center between 2010-2020. Pedicle type, skin incision, drain utilization, breast excision mass, sternal notch to nipple distance, and inframammary fold to nipple distance were analyzed with postoperative outcomes including hematoma, seroma, infection, dehiscence, nipple necrosis, and fat necrosis.

Results: This study included 944 female patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Median age was 39.0 years, median body mass index was 31.9 kg/m2, and median breast mass resected was 742 grams per side. Drain utilization did not significantly reduce postoperative hematoma (P = 0.196), seroma (P = 0.185), nipple necrosis (P = 0.511), or fat necrosis (P = 0.113), but drain utilization significantly increased postoperative surgical site infection (P = 0.011). Patients with breast mass removed over 1500 g had significantly higher risk of hematoma (P = 0.002), fat necrosis (P < 0.001), and nipple necrosis (P < 0.001) compared to patients with less than 1500 g removed. In patients with greater than 1500 g resected, drain utilization did not significantly decrease risk of hematoma (P = 0.086) or seroma (P = 0.497).

Conclusions: Breast reduction greater than 1500 g per side significantly increased risk of hematoma, nipple necrosis, and fat necrosis. Drain utilization did not demonstrate any advantageous effects, rather it increased risk of infection. Future multicenter study will be needed to confirm these findings across different patient referral networks and practice patterns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩小乳房成形术:闭式抽吸引流不能减少血肿或血肿,但会增加感染风险。
背景:虽然有越来越多的证据表明闭合吸力引流管是不必要的,但很少有文献表明缩胸后引流管是有害的。本研究的目的是探讨引流管对术后血肿、血肿和感染的影响,并阐明可能与这些并发症发生有关的任何危险因素。方法:回顾性队列研究2010-2020年间在我校医学中心进行的所有缩乳成形术。分析蒂型、皮肤切口、引流利用、乳腺切除肿块、胸骨切迹到乳头距离、乳下褶到乳头距离及术后血肿、血肿、感染、开裂、乳头坏死、脂肪坏死等结局。结果:本研究纳入944例女性乳房缩小成形术患者。中位年龄为39.0岁,中位体重指数为31.9 kg/m2,切除的中位乳房肿块为每侧742 g。引流液使用对术后血肿(P = 0.196)、血肿(P = 0.185)、乳头坏死(P = 0.511)、脂肪坏死(P = 0.113)无显著减少作用,但引流液使用显著增加术后手术部位感染(P = 0.011)。乳腺肿块切除超过1500 g的患者发生血肿(P = 0.002)、脂肪坏死(P < 0.001)和乳头坏死(P < 0.001)的风险明显高于切除小于1500 g的患者。在切除大于1500g的患者中,引流管的使用并没有显著降低血肿(P = 0.086)或血肿(P = 0.497)的风险。结论:乳房缩小大于每侧1500g显著增加血肿、乳头坏死和脂肪坏死的风险。引流液的使用并没有显示出任何有利的效果,反而增加了感染的风险。未来的多中心研究将需要在不同的患者转诊网络和实践模式中证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Cleft Lip Revision: A Proven Classification for Surgical Precision and Resource Optimization. Long-Term Outcomes of Autologous Fat Grafting for Pedal Fat Pad Atrophy. A Quadrant-based Algorithm for Oncoplastic Breast Reduction: The Use of Mirror Flaps for Filling Superior Pole Lumpectomy Defects. The Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Implant Loss in Immediate Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction. Clinical Outcomes Following Autologous Fat Grafting for Breast Reconstruction: An Interim Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Lipoaspirate Processing Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1