Simple Approach to Cosmetic Medial Epicanthoplasty: A Modification of the Skin Redraping Method.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004183
Ju Hee Kim, Hyungsuk Kim
{"title":"Simple Approach to Cosmetic Medial Epicanthoplasty: A Modification of the Skin Redraping Method.","authors":"Ju Hee Kim, Hyungsuk Kim","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The medial epicanthal fold is a common ethnic trait in East Asian faces, and there is a significant demand for its correction for cosmetic reasons. Numerous epicanthoplasty techniques have been proposed; however, visible scarring and unnatural canthal shapes have been challenges. This study aimed to introduce a simpler approach for medial epicanthoplasty to address these issues and evaluate its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2020 to October 2023, 199 patients who were followed up for more than 6 months and had no history of prior medial epicanthoplasty were included in the study. The intercanthal distance (ICD) was measured from preoperative and recent medical photographs, and the ratio of the ICD to the corneal diameter was calculated for magnification correction. Postoperative complications and patient-reported aesthetic outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The medial epicanthoplasty techniques used were the elliptical excision method in 94 patients and the mini-redraping method in 105 patients. The average follow-up period was 10.8 months. The ICD measurements demonstrated a statistically significant reduction after surgery in both groups. In the elliptical excision group, 14 patients (14.9%) reported dissatisfaction with their surgical outcomes. Two patients had prominent medial vertical scars, and 12 patients reported undercorrection. In the mini-redraping group, only 4 patients reported dissatisfaction with the surgical outcome (3.8%), all owing to undercorrection. No significant postoperative complications were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the mini-redraping method, the medial epicanthal fold can be effectively addressed with minimal complications while achieving the natural shape and symmetry of both canthi in a straightforward manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 2","pages":"145-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The medial epicanthal fold is a common ethnic trait in East Asian faces, and there is a significant demand for its correction for cosmetic reasons. Numerous epicanthoplasty techniques have been proposed; however, visible scarring and unnatural canthal shapes have been challenges. This study aimed to introduce a simpler approach for medial epicanthoplasty to address these issues and evaluate its outcomes.

Methods: From January 2020 to October 2023, 199 patients who were followed up for more than 6 months and had no history of prior medial epicanthoplasty were included in the study. The intercanthal distance (ICD) was measured from preoperative and recent medical photographs, and the ratio of the ICD to the corneal diameter was calculated for magnification correction. Postoperative complications and patient-reported aesthetic outcomes were evaluated.

Results: The medial epicanthoplasty techniques used were the elliptical excision method in 94 patients and the mini-redraping method in 105 patients. The average follow-up period was 10.8 months. The ICD measurements demonstrated a statistically significant reduction after surgery in both groups. In the elliptical excision group, 14 patients (14.9%) reported dissatisfaction with their surgical outcomes. Two patients had prominent medial vertical scars, and 12 patients reported undercorrection. In the mini-redraping group, only 4 patients reported dissatisfaction with the surgical outcome (3.8%), all owing to undercorrection. No significant postoperative complications were observed in either group.

Conclusions: With the mini-redraping method, the medial epicanthal fold can be effectively addressed with minimal complications while achieving the natural shape and symmetry of both canthi in a straightforward manner.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Changing Perspectives in Mastectomy: The Case for Nipple Preservation. Clinical Outcomes of Gender-Affirming Surgery in Individuals With Connective Tissue Disorders. Hourglass Constriction of a Single Fascicle of the Anterior Interosseous Nerve: A Case Report. Interprogram Differences in Core General, Core Plastic, and Plastic Surgery-Adjacent Training. Simple Approach to Cosmetic Medial Epicanthoplasty: A Modification of the Skin Redraping Method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1