Incidental Findings on Computed Tomography in Children With Blunt Abdominal Trauma.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Annals of emergency medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.12.012
Irma T Ugalde, Kenneth Yen, Grant Tatro, Paul Ishimine, Nisa S Atigapramoj, Pradip P Chaudhari, Kevan A McCarten-Gibbs, Mohamed Badawy, Jeffrey S Upperman, Nathan Kuppermann, James F Holmes
{"title":"Incidental Findings on Computed Tomography in Children With Blunt Abdominal Trauma.","authors":"Irma T Ugalde, Kenneth Yen, Grant Tatro, Paul Ishimine, Nisa S Atigapramoj, Pradip P Chaudhari, Kevan A McCarten-Gibbs, Mohamed Badawy, Jeffrey S Upperman, Nathan Kuppermann, James F Holmes","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>Nontraumatic, incidental findings on computed tomography (CT) may be discovered after blunt abdominal trauma in children; however, the rate and importance of these findings are not well known. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and types of incidental CT findings among injured children undergoing abdominal/pelvic CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of children (<18 years) who underwent abdominal/pelvic CT after blunt trauma. We abstracted radiology reports for nontraumatic findings. We assessed and classified findings by their clinical urgency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,581 children enrolled, 2,500 (33%) underwent abdominal/pelvic CT. The mean patient age was 10.1±4.8 years, and 1,446 (58%) were boys. A total of 988 (39.5%, 95% CI 37.6 to 41.5%) children had 1,552 incidental findings with a mean patient age of 10.6±4.8 years, of whom 59% were boys. Fifty-five (3.5%) incidental findings were considered to need immediate evaluation/treatment, and 84 (5.4%) were considered to require outpatient follow-up within 4 weeks. Most incidental findings, however, were considered less urgent regarding follow-up: 552 (36%) were routine, 574 (37%) were considered to have a potential need, and 287 (18%) did not need follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Forty percent of children undergoing CT scanning after abdominal trauma have incidental findings, few of which are clinically important and require timely follow-up. CT scans should be obtained only when necessary, and clinicians must be prepared to address incidental findings and ensure proper management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.12.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: Nontraumatic, incidental findings on computed tomography (CT) may be discovered after blunt abdominal trauma in children; however, the rate and importance of these findings are not well known. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and types of incidental CT findings among injured children undergoing abdominal/pelvic CT.

Methods: This was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of children (<18 years) who underwent abdominal/pelvic CT after blunt trauma. We abstracted radiology reports for nontraumatic findings. We assessed and classified findings by their clinical urgency.

Results: Of 7,581 children enrolled, 2,500 (33%) underwent abdominal/pelvic CT. The mean patient age was 10.1±4.8 years, and 1,446 (58%) were boys. A total of 988 (39.5%, 95% CI 37.6 to 41.5%) children had 1,552 incidental findings with a mean patient age of 10.6±4.8 years, of whom 59% were boys. Fifty-five (3.5%) incidental findings were considered to need immediate evaluation/treatment, and 84 (5.4%) were considered to require outpatient follow-up within 4 weeks. Most incidental findings, however, were considered less urgent regarding follow-up: 552 (36%) were routine, 574 (37%) were considered to have a potential need, and 287 (18%) did not need follow-up.

Conclusions: Forty percent of children undergoing CT scanning after abdominal trauma have incidental findings, few of which are clinically important and require timely follow-up. CT scans should be obtained only when necessary, and clinicians must be prepared to address incidental findings and ensure proper management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Adolescent Girl With Lower Abdominal Pain. An Erythematous Plaque on Sole of the Foot. Cybersecurity in Virtual Observation Units. Dyspnea in a Patient With Clear Lungs. Elderly Man With Abdominal Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1