Intervention With Concentrated Albumin for Undifferentiated Sepsis in the Emergency Department (ICARUS-ED): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Annals of emergency medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.12.016
Julian M Williams, Jaimi H Greenslade, Angela Z Hills, Mercedes T Ray
{"title":"Intervention With Concentrated Albumin for Undifferentiated Sepsis in the Emergency Department (ICARUS-ED): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Julian M Williams, Jaimi H Greenslade, Angela Z Hills, Mercedes T Ray","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Concentrated albumin early in sepsis resuscitation remains largely unexplored. Objectives were to determine 1) feasibility of early intervention with concentrated albumin in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected infection and hypoperfusion and 2) whether early albumin therapy improves outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ED patients with suspected infection and hypoperfusion (systolic blood pressure [SBP]<90 mmHg or lactate ≥4.0 mmol/L) were randomized to receive either 400 mL 20% albumin over 4 hours or no albumin. All patients were treated with crystalloids, antibiotics, and other therapies at the treating team's discretion. Primary outcome was SBP at 24 hours; secondary outcomes included SBP at 6 hours, fluid and organ support requirements, organ dysfunction, and mortality. Quantile and logistic regressions were used to calculate differences (and 95% CI) between study groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compliance with study protocol was more than 95%, and infection was confirmed in 95% of the 464 study patients enrolled. SBP at 24 hours did not differ between intervention (110.5 mmHg) and standard care arms (110 mmHg). In patients treated with albumin, SBP was higher at 6 hours, less total fluid was infused at 72 hours, fewer patients required vasopressor therapy at 24 and 72 hours, and organ function was improved. Mortality was not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early identification, trial enrollment, and intervention in ED patients with sepsis is feasible. In this pilot study, concentrated albumin given early in resuscitation did not improve SBP at 24 hours. Albumin was associated with less total fluid and vasopressor requirements and improved organ dysfunction. A multicenter study is indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.12.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Concentrated albumin early in sepsis resuscitation remains largely unexplored. Objectives were to determine 1) feasibility of early intervention with concentrated albumin in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected infection and hypoperfusion and 2) whether early albumin therapy improves outcomes.

Methods: ED patients with suspected infection and hypoperfusion (systolic blood pressure [SBP]<90 mmHg or lactate ≥4.0 mmol/L) were randomized to receive either 400 mL 20% albumin over 4 hours or no albumin. All patients were treated with crystalloids, antibiotics, and other therapies at the treating team's discretion. Primary outcome was SBP at 24 hours; secondary outcomes included SBP at 6 hours, fluid and organ support requirements, organ dysfunction, and mortality. Quantile and logistic regressions were used to calculate differences (and 95% CI) between study groups.

Results: Compliance with study protocol was more than 95%, and infection was confirmed in 95% of the 464 study patients enrolled. SBP at 24 hours did not differ between intervention (110.5 mmHg) and standard care arms (110 mmHg). In patients treated with albumin, SBP was higher at 6 hours, less total fluid was infused at 72 hours, fewer patients required vasopressor therapy at 24 and 72 hours, and organ function was improved. Mortality was not significantly different.

Conclusions: Early identification, trial enrollment, and intervention in ED patients with sepsis is feasible. In this pilot study, concentrated albumin given early in resuscitation did not improve SBP at 24 hours. Albumin was associated with less total fluid and vasopressor requirements and improved organ dysfunction. A multicenter study is indicated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Adolescent Girl With Lower Abdominal Pain. An Erythematous Plaque on Sole of the Foot. Cybersecurity in Virtual Observation Units. Dyspnea in a Patient With Clear Lungs. Elderly Man With Abdominal Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1