Sleep quality and cognitive functioning among Chinese older adults living in the US: a mixed-effects model analysis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05644-4
Fengyan Tang, Yuyang Zhu, Dasuni Jayawardena, Guoping Jin, Yanping Jiang
{"title":"Sleep quality and cognitive functioning among Chinese older adults living in the US: a mixed-effects model analysis.","authors":"Fengyan Tang, Yuyang Zhu, Dasuni Jayawardena, Guoping Jin, Yanping Jiang","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05644-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial and ethnic disparities in sleep quality and cognitive health are increasingly recognized, yet little is understood about their associations among Chinese older adults living in the United States. This study aims to examine the relationships between sleep health and cognitive functioning in this population, utilizing data from the Population Study of Chinese Elderly in Chicago (PINE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study utilized a two-wave panel design as part of the PINE, including 2,228 participants aged 65 years or older who self-identified as Chinese. Participants completed interviews at two time points. Cognitive functioning was assessed using a battery of tests, including the Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination (C_MMSE), the immediate and delayed recall of the East Boston Memory Test, the Digit Span Backwards assessment, and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Sleep quality was assessed using items from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), covering four aspects: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration. Insomnia was assessed using four items from the Women's Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale. Mixed-effects regression models were used to assess the effects of sleep parameters on baseline cognitive functioning and cognitive change over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had an average age of 77.42 years (± 7.57) at baseline, with about 39% reporting fairly bad or very bad sleep quality. Poorer overall sleep quality (B = -0.01, SE = 0.01, p < .01), and more insomnia symptoms (B = -0.01, SE = 0.00, p < .001) were associated with lower baseline global cognition. However, these associations diminished over time (sleep quality: B = 0.01, SE = 0.00, p < .05; insomnia: B = 0.00, SE = 0.00, p < .05). Among sleep quality subdomains, all except sleep efficiency had significantly negative relationships with baseline global cognition. The associations between sleep parameters and the four cognitive domains were less consistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight cross-sectional negative relationships between self-reported sleep parameters and cognition, showing distinct associations between various aspects of sleep quality and cognitive domains. Targeted interventions to improve sleep quality may have the potential to enhance cognitive health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05644-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in sleep quality and cognitive health are increasingly recognized, yet little is understood about their associations among Chinese older adults living in the United States. This study aims to examine the relationships between sleep health and cognitive functioning in this population, utilizing data from the Population Study of Chinese Elderly in Chicago (PINE).

Methods: This observational study utilized a two-wave panel design as part of the PINE, including 2,228 participants aged 65 years or older who self-identified as Chinese. Participants completed interviews at two time points. Cognitive functioning was assessed using a battery of tests, including the Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination (C_MMSE), the immediate and delayed recall of the East Boston Memory Test, the Digit Span Backwards assessment, and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Sleep quality was assessed using items from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), covering four aspects: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration. Insomnia was assessed using four items from the Women's Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale. Mixed-effects regression models were used to assess the effects of sleep parameters on baseline cognitive functioning and cognitive change over time.

Results: Participants had an average age of 77.42 years (± 7.57) at baseline, with about 39% reporting fairly bad or very bad sleep quality. Poorer overall sleep quality (B = -0.01, SE = 0.01, p < .01), and more insomnia symptoms (B = -0.01, SE = 0.00, p < .001) were associated with lower baseline global cognition. However, these associations diminished over time (sleep quality: B = 0.01, SE = 0.00, p < .05; insomnia: B = 0.00, SE = 0.00, p < .05). Among sleep quality subdomains, all except sleep efficiency had significantly negative relationships with baseline global cognition. The associations between sleep parameters and the four cognitive domains were less consistent.

Conclusions: The findings highlight cross-sectional negative relationships between self-reported sleep parameters and cognition, showing distinct associations between various aspects of sleep quality and cognitive domains. Targeted interventions to improve sleep quality may have the potential to enhance cognitive health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生活在美国的中国老年人的睡眠质量和认知功能:一个混合效应模型分析。
背景:人们越来越认识到睡眠质量和认知健康方面的种族和民族差异,但对生活在美国的中国老年人的睡眠质量和认知健康之间的关系知之甚少。本研究旨在利用芝加哥华人老年人口研究(PINE)的数据,研究该人群的睡眠健康与认知功能之间的关系。方法:本观察性研究采用双波面板设计作为PINE的一部分,包括2228名年龄在65岁或以上、自认为是中国人的参与者。参与者在两个时间点完成访谈。认知功能通过一系列测试进行评估,包括中国迷你精神状态测试(C_MMSE)、东波士顿记忆测试的即时和延迟回忆、数字广度向后评估和符号数字模态测试。使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估睡眠质量,包括四个方面:主观睡眠质量、睡眠潜伏期、睡眠效率和睡眠持续时间。失眠症的评估采用了妇女健康倡议失眠评定量表中的四个项目。混合效应回归模型用于评估睡眠参数对基线认知功能和认知变化的影响。结果:参与者的基线平均年龄为77.42岁(±7.57岁),约39%的人报告睡眠质量相当差或非常差。结论:研究结果强调了自我报告的睡眠参数与认知之间的横截面负相关关系,显示了睡眠质量的各个方面与认知领域之间的明显关联。改善睡眠质量的有针对性的干预措施可能有增强认知健康结果的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
The impact of 24-h activity behaviors on physical and mental health in Chinese older adults: a compositional isochronous substitution analysis. Preoperative geriatric assessment and postoperative outcomes in older adults at risk for frailty-related complications following major surgery: a retrospective comparative cohort study. A social return on investment analysis of the ENJOY seniors exercise park IMP-ACT project: improving older people's health through physical activity. Social and community determinants of living arrangements among older adults: the role of social support and mental health promotion. Feasibility of the tailored activity program to bridge hospital and community care for people living with dementia and behavioral disorders: The "Continu-A-Mente" project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1