The histopathologic evaluation of local effects of ozone therapy on the healing of experimental calvarial defects of rats.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05450-3
Tolga Bayar, Ebru Deniz Karslı
{"title":"The histopathologic evaluation of local effects of ozone therapy on the healing of experimental calvarial defects of rats.","authors":"Tolga Bayar, Ebru Deniz Karslı","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05450-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluates the effects of ozone on hard and soft tissue healing when a free tissue flap is used to close wound areas lacking primary closure over autogenous grafted sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our study, 24 male Wistar rats were divided into four groups: two control groups and two ozone-treated groups. All rats underwent the same surgical procedure. After surgery, the control groups received no additional treatment, while the ozone groups received topical ozone application. Ozone was applied for 2 min, three times per week, with one-day intervals, for a duration of 2 weeks post-surgery. Sacrifice was performed on the 14th day for one control and one ozone group, and on the 28th day for the remaining groups. All soft and hard tissue samples were then examined histopathologically.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>not applicable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histopathological evaluations and statistical analyses on the 14th day indicated that bone healing was significantly better in the ozone group compared to the control group (p = 0.049). For soft tissue healing, although there was no statistically significant difference between the ozone and control groups, proportional values showed better recovery in the ozone-treated groups compared to the controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study concludes that ozone has a positive effect on new bone formation in the early stages; however, it showed no statistically significant effect on soft tissue healing. We believe that further comprehensive studies would be beneficial to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05450-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the effects of ozone on hard and soft tissue healing when a free tissue flap is used to close wound areas lacking primary closure over autogenous grafted sites.

Methods: In our study, 24 male Wistar rats were divided into four groups: two control groups and two ozone-treated groups. All rats underwent the same surgical procedure. After surgery, the control groups received no additional treatment, while the ozone groups received topical ozone application. Ozone was applied for 2 min, three times per week, with one-day intervals, for a duration of 2 weeks post-surgery. Sacrifice was performed on the 14th day for one control and one ozone group, and on the 28th day for the remaining groups. All soft and hard tissue samples were then examined histopathologically.

Clinical trial number: not applicable.

Results: Histopathological evaluations and statistical analyses on the 14th day indicated that bone healing was significantly better in the ozone group compared to the control group (p = 0.049). For soft tissue healing, although there was no statistically significant difference between the ozone and control groups, proportional values showed better recovery in the ozone-treated groups compared to the controls.

Conclusions: The present study concludes that ozone has a positive effect on new bone formation in the early stages; however, it showed no statistically significant effect on soft tissue healing. We believe that further comprehensive studies would be beneficial to confirm these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
臭氧局部治疗对实验性大鼠颅骨缺损愈合影响的组织病理学评价。
背景:本研究评估了当游离组织瓣用于闭合自体移植物上缺乏初级闭合的创面区域时,臭氧对软硬组织愈合的影响。方法:将24只雄性Wistar大鼠分为4组:2个对照组和2个臭氧处理组。所有的大鼠都接受了相同的手术。术后,对照组不进行任何治疗,臭氧组局部应用臭氧。臭氧应用2分钟,每周3次,间隔一天,持续2周。1个对照组和1个臭氧组于第14天处死,其余各组于第28天处死。然后对所有软硬组织样本进行组织病理学检查。临床试验号:不适用。结果:第14天组织病理学评价及统计学分析显示,臭氧组骨愈合明显优于对照组(p = 0.049)。对于软组织愈合,虽然臭氧组和对照组之间没有统计学上的显著差异,但比例值显示臭氧处理组比对照组恢复得更好。结论:臭氧对早期新骨形成有积极作用;然而,它对软组织愈合没有统计学上的显著影响。我们相信,进一步的全面研究将有助于证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Sticky Bone on ridge preservation in periodontally compromised posterior extraction sockets: a retrospective study. Evaluation of color stability and bond strength of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM and 3D printing: an in vitro study. Automated detection and classification of maxillary sinus variations using slice-based and full-volume CBCT deep learning models. The effect of non-invasive physical interventions for accelerating tooth movement on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Association of periodontitis and tooth loss with cognitive decline in the older adults - a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1