Ziping Huang, Charalambos C Charalambous, Mengyue Chen, Taewon Kim, Estate Sokhadze, Allen Song, Sin-Ho Jung, Shashank Shekhar, Jody A Feld, Xiaoning Jiang, Wuwei Feng
{"title":"Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation in Stroke: A Phase I Safety & Feasibility Trial.","authors":"Ziping Huang, Charalambos C Charalambous, Mengyue Chen, Taewon Kim, Estate Sokhadze, Allen Song, Sin-Ho Jung, Shashank Shekhar, Jody A Feld, Xiaoning Jiang, Wuwei Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.brs.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to determine the maximum safe spatial-peak pulse-average intensity (I<sub>SPPA</sub>) of low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation (LIFUS) in stroke patients and explore its effect on motor learning and corticospinal excitability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adopted the classic 3+3 design to escalate I<sub>SPPA</sub> (estimated in-vivo transcranial value) from 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, to 8 W/cm<sup>2</sup>. Stopping rules were pre-defined: 2<sup>nd</sup>-degree scalp burn, clinical seizure, new lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging or major reduction in apparent diffusion coefficient, and participant discontinuation due to any reason. We applied 12-minute LIFUS over the ipsilesional motor cortex while participants were concurrently practicing 3 blocks of a motor sequence learning (MSL) task using the affected hand. We measured MSL (response time) and corticospinal excitability (motor evoked potential) pre- and post-stimulation and compared MSL and corticospinal excitability between the LOW (0, 1, and 2 W/cm<sup>2</sup>) and HIGH (4, 6, and 8 W/cm<sup>2</sup>) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>I<sub>SPPA</sub> was escalated to 8 W/cm<sup>2</sup> with 18 stroke participants without meeting the stopping rules. Compared to the LOW, more participants in the HIGH performed better on MSL (6/9 vs. 0/9, p = 0.009) and showed a sign of greater corticospinal excitability (7/9 vs. 5/9, p = 0.62).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our phase-I safety study suggests that one session of LIFUS up to 8 W/cm<sup>2</sup> I<sub>SPPA</sub> is safe and feasible in stroke patients, and high intensity induces positive changes on both MSL and corticospinal excitability. The next logical step is to conduct a phase-II trial testing the efficacy of LIFUS and continuously monitoring its safety profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":9206,"journal":{"name":"Brain Stimulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.01.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: We aim to determine the maximum safe spatial-peak pulse-average intensity (ISPPA) of low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation (LIFUS) in stroke patients and explore its effect on motor learning and corticospinal excitability.
Methods: We adopted the classic 3+3 design to escalate ISPPA (estimated in-vivo transcranial value) from 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, to 8 W/cm2. Stopping rules were pre-defined: 2nd-degree scalp burn, clinical seizure, new lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging or major reduction in apparent diffusion coefficient, and participant discontinuation due to any reason. We applied 12-minute LIFUS over the ipsilesional motor cortex while participants were concurrently practicing 3 blocks of a motor sequence learning (MSL) task using the affected hand. We measured MSL (response time) and corticospinal excitability (motor evoked potential) pre- and post-stimulation and compared MSL and corticospinal excitability between the LOW (0, 1, and 2 W/cm2) and HIGH (4, 6, and 8 W/cm2) groups.
Results: ISPPA was escalated to 8 W/cm2 with 18 stroke participants without meeting the stopping rules. Compared to the LOW, more participants in the HIGH performed better on MSL (6/9 vs. 0/9, p = 0.009) and showed a sign of greater corticospinal excitability (7/9 vs. 5/9, p = 0.62).
Interpretation: Our phase-I safety study suggests that one session of LIFUS up to 8 W/cm2 ISPPA is safe and feasible in stroke patients, and high intensity induces positive changes on both MSL and corticospinal excitability. The next logical step is to conduct a phase-II trial testing the efficacy of LIFUS and continuously monitoring its safety profiles.
期刊介绍:
Brain Stimulation publishes on the entire field of brain stimulation, including noninvasive and invasive techniques and technologies that alter brain function through the use of electrical, magnetic, radiowave, or focally targeted pharmacologic stimulation.
Brain Stimulation aims to be the premier journal for publication of original research in the field of neuromodulation. The journal includes: a) Original articles; b) Short Communications; c) Invited and original reviews; d) Technology and methodological perspectives (reviews of new devices, description of new methods, etc.); and e) Letters to the Editor. Special issues of the journal will be considered based on scientific merit.