The effect of increased vascular afterload measures on flow rate and survival in severe aortic stenosis.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeae331
Sara L Hungerford, Ning Song, Brandon Loo, Hari Sritharan, Eleanor Rye, Kay Everett, Andrew Jabbour, Christopher Hayward, Navin K Kapur, David W M Muller, Audrey I Adji
{"title":"The effect of increased vascular afterload measures on flow rate and survival in severe aortic stenosis.","authors":"Sara L Hungerford, Ning Song, Brandon Loo, Hari Sritharan, Eleanor Rye, Kay Everett, Andrew Jabbour, Christopher Hayward, Navin K Kapur, David W M Muller, Audrey I Adji","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeae331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Although an association between the systemic circulation and transaortic flow rate (TFR) is frequently hypothesized in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), it has not been demonstrated previously. We sought to explore the relationship between blood pressure (BP), vascular afterload measures, clinical history of hypertension, TFR, and survival in patients with severe AS (aortic valve area ≤ 1 cm²).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We studied 323 patients ≥ 65 years (110 prospective, 213 registry analysis) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement over a 5-year period. Aortic flow was obtained by Doppler echocardiography, with TFR calculated using a mathematical derivation method. A BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and/or mean arterial pressure ≥ 90 mmHg was considered hypertensive. Simultaneous pressure-flow analysis demonstrated that higher systolic BP (ß -0.545; P = 0.01†), pulse pressure (ß -0.545; P = 0.01†), vascular resistance (ß -0.02; P = 0.041), characteristic impedance (ß -0.27; P = 0.01), and lower arterial compliance (ß 32.73; P < 0.001†) were associated with reduced TFR in linear regression. In registry analysis, TFR was lower in those with a history of hypertension (223 ± 67 vs. 244 ± 77 mL/s; r -0.138; P = 0.045), coronary artery disease (CAD, P < 0.01), dialysis dependency (P < 0.01), and with increased anti-hypertensive medication use (P = 0.04), of which CAD (ß -28.5; P = 0.08†) and dialysis dependency (ß -68.5; P = 0.04†) remained significant in linear regression. A TFR ≤ 210 mL/s in normotensive patients was the strongest predictor of mortality (73.3% vs. 86.7%; P = 0.043; † denotes adjusted).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated vascular afterload measures and comorbidities linked to arteriosclerosis and/or degenerative aortic stiffening independently reduce flow rates in severe AS. A TFR ≤ 210 mL/s predicts mortality but improves with BP assessment during evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"674-685"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae331","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Although an association between the systemic circulation and transaortic flow rate (TFR) is frequently hypothesized in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), it has not been demonstrated previously. We sought to explore the relationship between blood pressure (BP), vascular afterload measures, clinical history of hypertension, TFR, and survival in patients with severe AS (aortic valve area ≤ 1 cm²).

Methods and results: We studied 323 patients ≥ 65 years (110 prospective, 213 registry analysis) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement over a 5-year period. Aortic flow was obtained by Doppler echocardiography, with TFR calculated using a mathematical derivation method. A BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and/or mean arterial pressure ≥ 90 mmHg was considered hypertensive. Simultaneous pressure-flow analysis demonstrated that higher systolic BP (ß -0.545; P = 0.01†), pulse pressure (ß -0.545; P = 0.01†), vascular resistance (ß -0.02; P = 0.041), characteristic impedance (ß -0.27; P = 0.01), and lower arterial compliance (ß 32.73; P < 0.001†) were associated with reduced TFR in linear regression. In registry analysis, TFR was lower in those with a history of hypertension (223 ± 67 vs. 244 ± 77 mL/s; r -0.138; P = 0.045), coronary artery disease (CAD, P < 0.01), dialysis dependency (P < 0.01), and with increased anti-hypertensive medication use (P = 0.04), of which CAD (ß -28.5; P = 0.08†) and dialysis dependency (ß -68.5; P = 0.04†) remained significant in linear regression. A TFR ≤ 210 mL/s in normotensive patients was the strongest predictor of mortality (73.3% vs. 86.7%; P = 0.043; † denotes adjusted).

Conclusion: Elevated vascular afterload measures and comorbidities linked to arteriosclerosis and/or degenerative aortic stiffening independently reduce flow rates in severe AS. A TFR ≤ 210 mL/s predicts mortality but improves with BP assessment during evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加血管后负荷对严重主动脉狭窄患者血流率和生存率的影响。
目的:尽管在主动脉狭窄(AS)患者中,体循环与经主动脉血流率(TFR)之间经常被假设存在关联,但此前尚未得到证实。我们试图探讨严重AS(主动脉瓣面积≤1 cm²)患者的血压(BP)、血管后负荷测量、高血压病史、TFR和生存率之间的关系。方法和结果:我们研究了323例≥65岁的患者(110例前瞻性,213例登记分析),这些患者在5年内接受了经导管主动脉瓣置换术。采用多普勒超声心动图获得主动脉流量,TFR采用数学推导法计算。血压≥140/90 mmHg和/或平均动脉压≥90 mmHg被认为是高血压。同时压力-流量分析表明,收缩压升高(ß -0.545;P = 0.01†),脉压(ß -0.545;P = 0.01†),血管阻力(ß -0.02;P = 0.041),特征阻抗(ß -0.27;P = 0.01),低动脉顺应性(ß 32.73;P < 0.001†)与TFR降低相关。在注册分析中,有高血压病史的患者TFR较低(223±67 vs 244±77 mL/s;r -0.138;P = 0.045)、冠状动脉疾病(CAD, P < 0.01)、透析依赖(P < 0.01)以及抗高血压药物使用增加(P = 0.04),其中CAD (-28.5;P = 0.08†)和透析依赖(ß -68.5;P = 0.04†)在线性回归中仍然显著。正常血压患者TFR≤210 mL/s是死亡率的最强预测因子(73.3% vs. 86.7%;P = 0.043;†表示调整)。结论:与动脉硬化和/或退行性主动脉硬化相关的血管后负荷升高和合并症单独降低了严重AS的血流速率。TFR≤210 mL/s可预测死亡率,但在评估期间通过血压评估可改善死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
708
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Follow-up of a Patient with a Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve Embolized into the Thoracic Descending Aorta. Multimodality Evaluation of Saw-Tooth Cardiomyopathy and Octopus Papillary Muscle. Primary cardiac granular cell tumour: comprehensive imaging and treatment strategy. 3D CT cinematic rendering of microcardia and multiple thoracoabdominal venous dilation in Proteus syndrome. Incidental myocardial haemangioma in an asymptomatic young woman: the central role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as a key diagnostic tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1