L.H. Douma , M.M. Hofman , F. Zwierenga , T.M.T. Zondervan , A.I.G. Buma , H. Schouwink , D.W. Dumoulin , J.A. Burgers , I. Smesseim , J.G.J.V. Aerts , C.J. de Gooijer
{"title":"Follow-up after first-Line nivOlumab plus ipilimumab in patients with diffuse pleuRal mesotheliomA: a real-world Dutch cohort study—FLORA","authors":"L.H. Douma , M.M. Hofman , F. Zwierenga , T.M.T. Zondervan , A.I.G. Buma , H. Schouwink , D.W. Dumoulin , J.A. Burgers , I. Smesseim , J.G.J.V. Aerts , C.J. de Gooijer","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Diffuse pleural mesothelioma (dPM) is an aggressive malignancy, primarily treated with palliative systemic therapy. Since 2022, nivolumab–ipilimumab (nivo/ipi) has replaced chemotherapy as the standard first-line treatment for dPM in the Netherlands. Chemotherapy remains a rational second-line treatment. The real-world effectiveness of second-line treatment after doublet immunotherapy remains unknown. The FLORA study aimed to provide an overview of treatment patterns in patients with dPM after first-line nivo/ipi and evaluate the effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy based on real-world data.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>FLORA was a Dutch multicenter retrospective cohort study. Clinical data were collected from the medical records. The primary endpoints were treatment patterns after nivo/ipi and median overall survival (mOS) of patients receiving second-line chemotherapy. The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) of second-line chemotherapy, and subgroup analyses (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and histological subtype). The study also updated the mOS for first-line nivo/ipi patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between May 2021 and July 2023, 277 patients with dPM receiving first-line nivo/ipi therapy were included. Sixty-eight percent of the patients were male, with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range 67-77 years). The histological subtypes were epithelioid (62%), sarcomatoid (22%), biphasic (13%), and unknown (3%). One hundred and two (47%) of the 218 patients with disease progression received second-line treatment, of whom 83 received second-line platinum–pemetrexed chemotherapy. The mOS and mPFS for second-line chemotherapy were 8.2 months ([95% confidence interval (CI) 7.4-9.1 months] and 5.6 months (95% CI 4.9-6.3 months), respectively, with an ORR of 37%. Poor performance score was the main reason for not receiving second-line treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides the first real-world data on subsequent treatment of patients with dPM with disease progression on nivo/ipi, resulting in an mOS of 8.2 months after second-line chemotherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"Article 104123"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702924018945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Diffuse pleural mesothelioma (dPM) is an aggressive malignancy, primarily treated with palliative systemic therapy. Since 2022, nivolumab–ipilimumab (nivo/ipi) has replaced chemotherapy as the standard first-line treatment for dPM in the Netherlands. Chemotherapy remains a rational second-line treatment. The real-world effectiveness of second-line treatment after doublet immunotherapy remains unknown. The FLORA study aimed to provide an overview of treatment patterns in patients with dPM after first-line nivo/ipi and evaluate the effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy based on real-world data.
Patients and methods
FLORA was a Dutch multicenter retrospective cohort study. Clinical data were collected from the medical records. The primary endpoints were treatment patterns after nivo/ipi and median overall survival (mOS) of patients receiving second-line chemotherapy. The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) of second-line chemotherapy, and subgroup analyses (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and histological subtype). The study also updated the mOS for first-line nivo/ipi patients.
Results
Between May 2021 and July 2023, 277 patients with dPM receiving first-line nivo/ipi therapy were included. Sixty-eight percent of the patients were male, with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range 67-77 years). The histological subtypes were epithelioid (62%), sarcomatoid (22%), biphasic (13%), and unknown (3%). One hundred and two (47%) of the 218 patients with disease progression received second-line treatment, of whom 83 received second-line platinum–pemetrexed chemotherapy. The mOS and mPFS for second-line chemotherapy were 8.2 months ([95% confidence interval (CI) 7.4-9.1 months] and 5.6 months (95% CI 4.9-6.3 months), respectively, with an ORR of 37%. Poor performance score was the main reason for not receiving second-line treatment.
Conclusion
This study provides the first real-world data on subsequent treatment of patients with dPM with disease progression on nivo/ipi, resulting in an mOS of 8.2 months after second-line chemotherapy.
背景:弥漫性胸膜间皮瘤(dPM)是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,主要采用姑息性全身治疗。自2022年以来,nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivo/ipi)已取代化疗成为荷兰dPM的标准一线治疗方法。化疗仍然是一种合理的二线治疗。双重免疫治疗后的二线治疗的实际有效性尚不清楚。FLORA研究旨在概述一线nivo/ipi后dPM患者的治疗模式,并根据真实数据评估二线化疗的有效性。患者和方法:FLORA是一项荷兰多中心回顾性队列研究。从医疗记录中收集临床数据。主要终点是nivo/ipi后的治疗模式和接受二线化疗患者的中位总生存期(mOS)。次要终点是二线化疗的客观缓解率(ORR)、中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和亚组分析(东部肿瘤合作组的表现状况和组织学亚型)。该研究还更新了nivo/ipi一线患者的mOS。结果:在2021年5月至2023年7月期间,纳入了277例接受一线nivo/ipi治疗的dPM患者。68%的患者为男性,中位年龄为72岁(四分位数范围为67-77岁)。组织学亚型为上皮样(62%)、肉瘤样(22%)、双相(13%)和未知(3%)。218例疾病进展患者中有102例(47%)接受了二线治疗,其中83例接受了二线铂-培美曲塞化疗。二线化疗的mOS和mPFS分别为8.2个月([95%可信区间(CI) 7.4-9.1个月]和5.6个月(95% CI 4.9-6.3个月),ORR为37%。表现评分差是未接受二线治疗的主要原因。结论:本研究提供了nivo/ipi治疗后疾病进展的dPM患者后续治疗的第一个真实数据,导致二线化疗后的mOS为8.2个月。
期刊介绍:
ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research.
ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO.
Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.