Vitaliy Androshchuk, Omar Chehab, Joshua Wilcox, Benedict McDonaugh, Natalie Montarello, Ronak Rajani, Bernard Prendergast, Tiffany Patterson, Simon Redwood
{"title":"Evolving perspectives on aortic stenosis: the increasing importance of evaluating the right ventricle before aortic valve intervention.","authors":"Vitaliy Androshchuk, Omar Chehab, Joshua Wilcox, Benedict McDonaugh, Natalie Montarello, Ronak Rajani, Bernard Prendergast, Tiffany Patterson, Simon Redwood","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1506993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aortic stenosis (AS) was historically considered a disease of the left side of the heart, with the main pathophysiological impact being predominantly on the left ventricle (LV). However, progressive pressure overload in AS can initiate a cascade of extra-valvular myocardial remodeling that could also precipitate maladaptive alterations in the structure and function of the right ventricle (RV). The haemodynamic and clinical importance of these changes in patients with AS have been largely underappreciated in the past. Contemporary data indicates that RV dilatation or impairment identifies the AS patients who are at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). It is now increasingly recognised that effective quantitative assessment of the RV plays a key role in delineating the late clinical stage of AS, which could improve patient risk stratification. Despite the increasing emphasis on the pathological significance of RV changes in AS, it remains to be established if earlier detection of these changes can improve the timing for intervention. This review will summarise the features of normal RV physiology and the mechanisms responsible for RV impairment in AS. In addition, we will discuss the multimodality approach to the comprehensive assessment of RV size, function and mechanics in AS patients. Finally, we will review the emerging evidence reinforcing the negative impact of RV dysfunction on clinical outcomes in AS patients treated with AVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1506993"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1506993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) was historically considered a disease of the left side of the heart, with the main pathophysiological impact being predominantly on the left ventricle (LV). However, progressive pressure overload in AS can initiate a cascade of extra-valvular myocardial remodeling that could also precipitate maladaptive alterations in the structure and function of the right ventricle (RV). The haemodynamic and clinical importance of these changes in patients with AS have been largely underappreciated in the past. Contemporary data indicates that RV dilatation or impairment identifies the AS patients who are at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). It is now increasingly recognised that effective quantitative assessment of the RV plays a key role in delineating the late clinical stage of AS, which could improve patient risk stratification. Despite the increasing emphasis on the pathological significance of RV changes in AS, it remains to be established if earlier detection of these changes can improve the timing for intervention. This review will summarise the features of normal RV physiology and the mechanisms responsible for RV impairment in AS. In addition, we will discuss the multimodality approach to the comprehensive assessment of RV size, function and mechanics in AS patients. Finally, we will review the emerging evidence reinforcing the negative impact of RV dysfunction on clinical outcomes in AS patients treated with AVR.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers?
At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.