A Cross-sectional Survey of Physicians to Understand Biomarker Testing and Treatment Patterns in Patients with Prostate Cancer in the USA, EU5, Japan, and China

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European Urology Open Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.113
Christian Gratzke , Himani Aggarwal , Jeri Kim , Holly Chaignaud , Sabine Oskar
{"title":"A Cross-sectional Survey of Physicians to Understand Biomarker Testing and Treatment Patterns in Patients with Prostate Cancer in the USA, EU5, Japan, and China","authors":"Christian Gratzke ,&nbsp;Himani Aggarwal ,&nbsp;Jeri Kim ,&nbsp;Holly Chaignaud ,&nbsp;Sabine Oskar","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Treatment landscape in advanced prostate cancer (PC) is evolving. There is limited understanding of the factors influencing decision-making for genetic/genomic testing and the barriers to recommending testing and treatment in international real-world clinical practice following the approval of poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) for metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC). This work aims to assess genetic/genomic testing patterns and methods, including for homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm), and treatment decisions among physicians caring for patients with PC across the USA, Europe, and Asia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional online survey of physicians treating patients with advanced PC was administered in the USA, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK, Japan, and China. Physicians were recruited (from August to December 2022) via clinical panels and provided informed consent. Survey questions covered factors influencing HRRm testing and treatment decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Physicians reported that 50% of patients with mCRPC are recommended for HRRm testing, and among those recommended for testing, 60% are recommended for <em>BRCA1/2</em> mutation testing and 65% go on to receive HRRm testing. Overall proportions of patients recommended for testing increased following PARPi approval (from 20% to 50%) and following updated practice guidelines (from 25% to 50%). Perceived barriers to the use of genetic/genomic testing included patient refusal, lack of insurance/reimbursement, and lack of availability of adequate tissue for testing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Overall, testing rates increased following PARPi approval and updated clinical practice guidelines; yet, there was a wide variation in the proportions of patients with mCRPC recommended for testing, and perceived barriers to testing remain, suggesting unmet needs for patients and physicians.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We surveyed physicians globally about their experience in treating patients with advanced prostate cancer and genetic testing. Physicians reported that half of patients are recommended for genetic testing, which varied across countries. We conclude that barriers to testing remain for patients and physicians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 148-155"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168324006153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Treatment landscape in advanced prostate cancer (PC) is evolving. There is limited understanding of the factors influencing decision-making for genetic/genomic testing and the barriers to recommending testing and treatment in international real-world clinical practice following the approval of poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) for metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC). This work aims to assess genetic/genomic testing patterns and methods, including for homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm), and treatment decisions among physicians caring for patients with PC across the USA, Europe, and Asia.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey of physicians treating patients with advanced PC was administered in the USA, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK, Japan, and China. Physicians were recruited (from August to December 2022) via clinical panels and provided informed consent. Survey questions covered factors influencing HRRm testing and treatment decision-making.

Key findings and limitations

Physicians reported that 50% of patients with mCRPC are recommended for HRRm testing, and among those recommended for testing, 60% are recommended for BRCA1/2 mutation testing and 65% go on to receive HRRm testing. Overall proportions of patients recommended for testing increased following PARPi approval (from 20% to 50%) and following updated practice guidelines (from 25% to 50%). Perceived barriers to the use of genetic/genomic testing included patient refusal, lack of insurance/reimbursement, and lack of availability of adequate tissue for testing.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Overall, testing rates increased following PARPi approval and updated clinical practice guidelines; yet, there was a wide variation in the proportions of patients with mCRPC recommended for testing, and perceived barriers to testing remain, suggesting unmet needs for patients and physicians.

Patient summary

We surveyed physicians globally about their experience in treating patients with advanced prostate cancer and genetic testing. Physicians reported that half of patients are recommended for genetic testing, which varied across countries. We conclude that barriers to testing remain for patients and physicians.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国、欧盟、日本和中国医生了解前列腺癌患者生物标志物检测和治疗模式的横断面调查。
背景与目的:晚期前列腺癌(PC)的治疗前景正在发生变化。随着多腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)被批准用于转移性去癌耐药PC (mCRPC),人们对影响基因/基因组检测决策的因素以及在国际现实世界临床实践中推荐检测和治疗的障碍的理解有限。这项工作旨在评估遗传/基因组检测模式和方法,包括同源重组修复突变(HRRm),以及在美国、欧洲和亚洲照顾PC患者的医生的治疗决策。方法:对美国、法国、德国、意大利、西班牙、英国、日本和中国治疗晚期PC患者的医生进行横断面在线调查。通过临床小组招募医生(2022年8月至12月),并提供知情同意书。调查问题包括影响HRRm检测和治疗决策的因素。主要发现和局限性:医生报告50%的mCRPC患者被推荐进行HRRm检测,在推荐检测的患者中,60%的人被推荐进行BRCA1/2突变检测,65%的人继续接受HRRm检测。在PARPi批准(从20%到50%)和更新的实践指南(从25%到50%)之后,推荐进行检测的患者的总体比例增加了。人们认为使用基因/基因组检测的障碍包括患者拒绝,缺乏保险/报销,以及缺乏足够的检测组织。结论和临床意义:总体而言,PARPi批准和更新临床实践指南后,检测率增加;然而,推荐进行检测的mCRPC患者比例存在很大差异,并且检测的感知障碍仍然存在,这表明患者和医生的需求未得到满足。患者总结:我们调查了全球医生在治疗晚期前列腺癌患者和基因检测方面的经验。医生报告说,有一半的患者被建议进行基因检测,这在各国有所不同。我们的结论是,对患者和医生来说,检测的障碍仍然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Divergent Differentiation and Histologic Subtypes in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Demonstrate Distinct Patterns of Extraurothelial Recurrence Incidental Prostate Cancer Is an Uncommon but Clinically Non-negligible Cause of Death in Selected Long-term Survivors of Urothelial Carcinoma—Oncological Outcomes and a Proposed Follow-up Strategy from a Tertiary Referral Center Complications and Risk Factors of Neurogenic Bladder: A Delphi Consensus Autologous Tissue Substitutes for Ureteral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Outcomes NECTIN4 Amplification Is a Frequent Event in Central Nervous System Metastases of Urothelial Carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1