Impact of Surgical Margin Status and Tumor Volume on Mortality After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European Urology Open Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2024.12.004
Zaki Zeidan , Joshua Tran , Yeagyeong Hwang , Linda My Huynh , Mai Xuan Nguyen , Erica Huang , Whitney Zhang , Thomas Ahlering
{"title":"Impact of Surgical Margin Status and Tumor Volume on Mortality After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy","authors":"Zaki Zeidan ,&nbsp;Joshua Tran ,&nbsp;Yeagyeong Hwang ,&nbsp;Linda My Huynh ,&nbsp;Mai Xuan Nguyen ,&nbsp;Erica Huang ,&nbsp;Whitney Zhang ,&nbsp;Thomas Ahlering","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Positive surgical margins (PSMs) following radical prostatectomy (RP) have been seen as inherently unfavorable. However, a large international multi-institutional study recently revealed that unifocal PSMs (UPSMs) had no impact on prostate cancer–specific mortality (PCSM), whereas multifocal PSMs (MPSMs) did. Our aim was to assess the relative impact of PSMs versus percentage tumor volume (PTV) on PCSM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data for 1552 patients who underwent robot-assisted RP performed by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2018 at a tertiary referral center with up to 15-yr follow-up. Patients were divided into negative surgical margin (NSM), UPSM, and MPSM groups, with PTV stratification using a cutoff of 40%. The primary outcome was stepwise multivariate regression analysis of predictors of PCSM (pT stage, pathological Gleason grade group, PTV, UPSM, and MPSM). The secondary outcome was the risk of 15-yr PCSM via Kaplan-Meier analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>The group with 40–100% PTV was older and presented with more advanced grade and stage. High PTV was significantly associated with greater risk of PSM, biochemical recurrence, PCSM, and overall mortality at 15 yr (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). In addition to high stage and grade, MPSM predicted PCSM in multivariate analysis, but lost predictive significance when PTV was included. Limitations of the study include the retrospective nature and the single-center setting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Our study further challenges the belief that MPSMs inherently have an adverse impact on PCSM. Instead, MPSMs appear to signify more aggressive underlying disease that predominantly drives oncological outcomes. We recommend considering PTV as a more reliable predictor of PCSM. While avoidance of PSMs remains a critical surgical principle, this goal in prostate cancer needs to be weighed against urinary and sexual function outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>After surgery to remove the prostate in men with prostate cancer, samples from the edge of the prostate that are positive for tumor cells are called positive surgical margins (PSMs). Results from our study show that a PSM on its own is not necessarily an adverse factor. However, PSMs may be a sign of higher severity of prostate cancer. We found that men with a high tumor volume have a higher risk of dying from their prostate cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 187-192"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168324014356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Positive surgical margins (PSMs) following radical prostatectomy (RP) have been seen as inherently unfavorable. However, a large international multi-institutional study recently revealed that unifocal PSMs (UPSMs) had no impact on prostate cancer–specific mortality (PCSM), whereas multifocal PSMs (MPSMs) did. Our aim was to assess the relative impact of PSMs versus percentage tumor volume (PTV) on PCSM.

Methods

We analyzed data for 1552 patients who underwent robot-assisted RP performed by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2018 at a tertiary referral center with up to 15-yr follow-up. Patients were divided into negative surgical margin (NSM), UPSM, and MPSM groups, with PTV stratification using a cutoff of 40%. The primary outcome was stepwise multivariate regression analysis of predictors of PCSM (pT stage, pathological Gleason grade group, PTV, UPSM, and MPSM). The secondary outcome was the risk of 15-yr PCSM via Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Key findings and limitations

The group with 40–100% PTV was older and presented with more advanced grade and stage. High PTV was significantly associated with greater risk of PSM, biochemical recurrence, PCSM, and overall mortality at 15 yr (p < 0.001). In addition to high stage and grade, MPSM predicted PCSM in multivariate analysis, but lost predictive significance when PTV was included. Limitations of the study include the retrospective nature and the single-center setting.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Our study further challenges the belief that MPSMs inherently have an adverse impact on PCSM. Instead, MPSMs appear to signify more aggressive underlying disease that predominantly drives oncological outcomes. We recommend considering PTV as a more reliable predictor of PCSM. While avoidance of PSMs remains a critical surgical principle, this goal in prostate cancer needs to be weighed against urinary and sexual function outcomes.

Patient summary

After surgery to remove the prostate in men with prostate cancer, samples from the edge of the prostate that are positive for tumor cells are called positive surgical margins (PSMs). Results from our study show that a PSM on its own is not necessarily an adverse factor. However, PSMs may be a sign of higher severity of prostate cancer. We found that men with a high tumor volume have a higher risk of dying from their prostate cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术切缘状态和肿瘤体积对机器人根治性前列腺切除术后死亡率的影响。
背景和目的:根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后的阳性切缘(psm)被认为是固有的不利因素。然而,最近一项大型国际多机构研究显示,单焦点psm (upsm)对前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)没有影响,而多焦点psm (mpsm)有影响。我们的目的是评估psm与肿瘤体积百分比(PTV)对PCSM的相对影响。方法:我们分析了1552名患者的数据,这些患者在2002年至2018年期间在三级转诊中心接受了由一名外科医生进行的机器人辅助RP手术,随访时间长达15年。患者被分为阴性手术切缘(NSM)组、UPSM组和MPSM组,PTV分层采用40%的截止率。主要结局是对PCSM的预测因素(pT分期、病理Gleason分级组、PTV、UPSM和MPSM)进行逐步多元回归分析。通过Kaplan-Meier分析,次要终点是15年PCSM的风险。主要发现和局限性:40-100% PTV组年龄较大,表现为更高级的分级和分期。高PTV与更高的PSM、生化复发、PCSM和15年总死亡率显著相关(p)结论和临床意义:我们的研究进一步挑战了mpsm固有地对PCSM有不利影响的观点。相反,mpsm似乎表明更具侵袭性的潜在疾病,主要驱动肿瘤结果。我们建议将PTV作为PCSM更可靠的预测指标。虽然避免psm仍然是一个关键的手术原则,但前列腺癌的这一目标需要与泌尿和性功能的结果进行权衡。患者总结:前列腺癌患者手术切除前列腺后,前列腺边缘肿瘤细胞阳性的样本被称为阳性手术切缘(psm)。我们的研究结果表明,PSM本身并不一定是一个不利因素。然而,psm可能是前列腺癌更严重的征兆。我们发现肿瘤体积大的男性死于前列腺癌的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Divergent Differentiation and Histologic Subtypes in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Demonstrate Distinct Patterns of Extraurothelial Recurrence Incidental Prostate Cancer Is an Uncommon but Clinically Non-negligible Cause of Death in Selected Long-term Survivors of Urothelial Carcinoma—Oncological Outcomes and a Proposed Follow-up Strategy from a Tertiary Referral Center Complications and Risk Factors of Neurogenic Bladder: A Delphi Consensus Autologous Tissue Substitutes for Ureteral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Outcomes NECTIN4 Amplification Is a Frequent Event in Central Nervous System Metastases of Urothelial Carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1