Free-Hand Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Duodenal Subepithelial Lesions.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1111/jgh.16878
Peirong Xu, Zuqiang Liu, Li Wang, Yifan Qu, Chenchao Xu, Anyi Xiang, Wei Su, Tao Tan, Jiyuan Zhang, Lu Yao, Meidong Xu, Yunshi Zhong, Quanlin Li, Pinghong Zhou, Hao Hu
{"title":"Free-Hand Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Duodenal Subepithelial Lesions.","authors":"Peirong Xu, Zuqiang Liu, Li Wang, Yifan Qu, Chenchao Xu, Anyi Xiang, Wei Su, Tao Tan, Jiyuan Zhang, Lu Yao, Meidong Xu, Yunshi Zhong, Quanlin Li, Pinghong Zhou, Hao Hu","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>This work aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of free-hand endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for duodenal subepithelial lesions (SELs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of 105 patients with duodenal SELs who underwent free-hand EFTR. Free-hand EFTR means no other devices (over-the-scope clip or full-thickness resection device) are required. The preoperative baseline data, procedure-related characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technical success rate was 99.0%, and the en bloc resection rate was 94.2%. A total of nine (8.7%) patients experienced major postoperative adverse events (AEs). The incidence of major AEs was significantly higher for lesions with a maximum diameter ≥ 2 cm (30.4%) than for lesions with a maximum diameter < 2 cm (2.6%) (p < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the incidence of major AEs for peri-ampullary lesions (37.5%), bulb lesions (4.8%), bulb-descending junction lesions (6.7%), and descending part lesions (12.5%) (p = 0.032). Multivariable regression analyses revealed that the maximum diameter ≥ 2 cm (OR = 18.108; 95% CI = 1.881-174.281; p = 0.012) and lesions located in peri-ampullary (OR = 18.950; 95% CI = 1.219-294.648; p = 0.036) were independent risk factors for major AEs. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 36.6 ± 21.3 months, and only one patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumors recurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Free-hand EFTR is a safe and effective technique for nonampullary duodenal SELs with a maximum diameter of < 2 cm. Given the complexity of the duodenal anatomy, this procedure should be performed by experienced endoscopists.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: This work aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of free-hand endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for duodenal subepithelial lesions (SELs).

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 105 patients with duodenal SELs who underwent free-hand EFTR. Free-hand EFTR means no other devices (over-the-scope clip or full-thickness resection device) are required. The preoperative baseline data, procedure-related characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

Results: The technical success rate was 99.0%, and the en bloc resection rate was 94.2%. A total of nine (8.7%) patients experienced major postoperative adverse events (AEs). The incidence of major AEs was significantly higher for lesions with a maximum diameter ≥ 2 cm (30.4%) than for lesions with a maximum diameter < 2 cm (2.6%) (p < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the incidence of major AEs for peri-ampullary lesions (37.5%), bulb lesions (4.8%), bulb-descending junction lesions (6.7%), and descending part lesions (12.5%) (p = 0.032). Multivariable regression analyses revealed that the maximum diameter ≥ 2 cm (OR = 18.108; 95% CI = 1.881-174.281; p = 0.012) and lesions located in peri-ampullary (OR = 18.950; 95% CI = 1.219-294.648; p = 0.036) were independent risk factors for major AEs. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 36.6 ± 21.3 months, and only one patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumors recurred.

Conclusions: Free-hand EFTR is a safe and effective technique for nonampullary duodenal SELs with a maximum diameter of < 2 cm. Given the complexity of the duodenal anatomy, this procedure should be performed by experienced endoscopists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Survival Outcomes Associated With Radiological Progressive Disease Subtypes in Patients With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab-Treated HCC. Free-Hand Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Duodenal Subepithelial Lesions. Gastrointestinal: An Unexpected Scene of Epigastric Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis. Long-Term Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease With MASLD: A Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study in UK Biobank. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies in Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1