Zhi-Qi Zhang, Yu-Ze Lin, Shang-Yi Liu, Bi-Hui Song, Chun-Gong Gong, Shao-Jie Wang, Tao Ye, Kang-Quan Shou
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of the modified internal brace and the arthroscopic Broström-Gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability.","authors":"Zhi-Qi Zhang, Yu-Ze Lin, Shang-Yi Liu, Bi-Hui Song, Chun-Gong Gong, Shao-Jie Wang, Tao Ye, Kang-Quan Shou","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06382-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy of an internal brace and the arthroscopic Broström-Gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 71 patients who were diagnosed with chronic lateral ankle instability between May 2020 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 patients were followed up for a mean of 21 months (range, 16-24 months). Thirty-seven patients underwent the modified Broström-Gould (IB) procedure, and twenty-two patients underwent the arthroscopic Broström-Gould (ABG) procedure. The mean postoperative VAS score (P = 0.790), AOFAS score (P = 0.252), FAAM daily activity score (P = 0.983), and FAAM for sports activity score (P = 0.379) were not significantly different between the ABG and IB groups at the final follow-up. However, the FAAM sports score was better in the internal brace group than in the arthroscopy group at the 1-year postoperative follow-up (P = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients treated with an internal brace recovered faster than those who underwent the arthroscopic ABG procedure. However, no other significant differences were observed between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06382-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of an internal brace and the arthroscopic Broström-Gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI).
Methods: The clinical data of 71 patients who were diagnosed with chronic lateral ankle instability between May 2020 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess clinical outcomes.
Results: A total of 59 patients were followed up for a mean of 21 months (range, 16-24 months). Thirty-seven patients underwent the modified Broström-Gould (IB) procedure, and twenty-two patients underwent the arthroscopic Broström-Gould (ABG) procedure. The mean postoperative VAS score (P = 0.790), AOFAS score (P = 0.252), FAAM daily activity score (P = 0.983), and FAAM for sports activity score (P = 0.379) were not significantly different between the ABG and IB groups at the final follow-up. However, the FAAM sports score was better in the internal brace group than in the arthroscopy group at the 1-year postoperative follow-up (P = 0.025).
Conclusion: Patients treated with an internal brace recovered faster than those who underwent the arthroscopic ABG procedure. However, no other significant differences were observed between the two methods.
Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.
期刊介绍：
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
