Effectiveness of rehabilitation in hospitalized hemodialysis patients as compared with rehabilitation in hospitalized patients not on hemodialysis: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1007/s40620-024-02192-3
Ren Takahashi, Hiroki Yabe, Hideaki Ishikawa, Takashi Hibino, Akio Suzumura, Tetsuya Yamada
{"title":"Effectiveness of rehabilitation in hospitalized hemodialysis patients as compared with rehabilitation in hospitalized patients not on hemodialysis: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ren Takahashi, Hiroki Yabe, Hideaki Ishikawa, Takashi Hibino, Akio Suzumura, Tetsuya Yamada","doi":"10.1007/s40620-024-02192-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of rehabilitation aimed at improving the activities of daily living and physical functions may differ between hospitalized patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and not undergoing HD (non-HD). The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of rehabilitation between hospitalized HD and non-HD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of inpatients who underwent rehabilitation. We measured the rehabilitation time (min/day), length of hospital stay (days), and the Barthel index (BI). In addition, at the time of admission and discharge, grip strength, isometric knee extension strength, 10 m walking speed, timed up and go test, and short physical performance battery were examined. The outcomes were then compared between the HD and non-HD groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study was made up of 902 patients (non-HD group: 765, HD group: 137). Our analysis revealed a lower rehabilitation time [43.3 (0.6) vs. 38.8 (1.2) min/day] and longer hospital stay [48.5 (0.5) vs. 58.1 (2.3) days] in the HD group as compared with the non-HD group (p < 0.05). In addition, the 10 m walking speed [0.75 (0.02) vs. 0.66 (0.03) m/s], timed up and go test [20.8 (0.7) vs. 24.3 (1.0) sec], and short physical performance battery [6.3 (0.6) vs. 4.7 (0.6) points] at discharge were also significantly lower in the HD group as compared with the non-HD group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rehabilitation efforts for HD patients need to be improved by securing more time for inpatient rehabilitation and promoting mobility function improvement for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02192-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of rehabilitation aimed at improving the activities of daily living and physical functions may differ between hospitalized patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and not undergoing HD (non-HD). The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of rehabilitation between hospitalized HD and non-HD patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of inpatients who underwent rehabilitation. We measured the rehabilitation time (min/day), length of hospital stay (days), and the Barthel index (BI). In addition, at the time of admission and discharge, grip strength, isometric knee extension strength, 10 m walking speed, timed up and go test, and short physical performance battery were examined. The outcomes were then compared between the HD and non-HD groups.

Results: This study was made up of 902 patients (non-HD group: 765, HD group: 137). Our analysis revealed a lower rehabilitation time [43.3 (0.6) vs. 38.8 (1.2) min/day] and longer hospital stay [48.5 (0.5) vs. 58.1 (2.3) days] in the HD group as compared with the non-HD group (p < 0.05). In addition, the 10 m walking speed [0.75 (0.02) vs. 0.66 (0.03) m/s], timed up and go test [20.8 (0.7) vs. 24.3 (1.0) sec], and short physical performance battery [6.3 (0.6) vs. 4.7 (0.6) points] at discharge were also significantly lower in the HD group as compared with the non-HD group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Rehabilitation efforts for HD patients need to be improved by securing more time for inpatient rehabilitation and promoting mobility function improvement for these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
期刊最新文献
Regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy: a prospective study in a resource-limited intensive care unit from Vietnam. ANCA renal risk score to predict kidney outcomes in an Australian cohort: a single-centre experience. Lesson for the clinical nephrologist: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in a patient with obesity and diabetic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis. Hemoadsorption and plasma adsorption: two current options for the 3rd dimension of dialysis purification. Identification of conserved gene expression changes across common glomerular diseases by spatial transcriptomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1