Improving postsurgical paresis in brain tumor patients by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1007/s11060-024-04931-9
Tizian Rosenstock, Thomas Picht, Melina Engelhardt, Ulrike Grittner, Maximilian Mönch, Peter Vajkoczy, José Pedro Lavrador, Ana Mirallave-Pescador, Francesco Vergani, Maximilian Schwendner, Axel Schroeder, Leonie Kram, Haosu Zhang, Sujit Prabhu, Sarah Prinsloo, Bernhard Meyer, Sebastian Ille, Sandro M Krieg
{"title":"Improving postsurgical paresis in brain tumor patients by transcranial magnetic stimulation.","authors":"Tizian Rosenstock, Thomas Picht, Melina Engelhardt, Ulrike Grittner, Maximilian Mönch, Peter Vajkoczy, José Pedro Lavrador, Ana Mirallave-Pescador, Francesco Vergani, Maximilian Schwendner, Axel Schroeder, Leonie Kram, Haosu Zhang, Sujit Prabhu, Sarah Prinsloo, Bernhard Meyer, Sebastian Ille, Sandro M Krieg","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04931-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Recently, reduction of transcallosal inhibition by contralateral navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrTMS) improved neurorehabilitation of glioma patients with new postoperative paresis. This multicentric study examines the effect of postoperative nrTMS in brain tumor patients to treat surgery-related upper extremity paresis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of two randomized and three one-arm studies in brain tumor patients with new/progressive postoperative paresis. Patients underwent either low frequency contralesional nrTMS or sham stimulation followed by physiotherapy. Outcome was assessed on postoperative day 1, 7, and after 3 months using British Medical Research Council score (BMRC), Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 135 patients (mean age of 53.8 years, 60 women) were included, of whom 51 patients were treated in RCTs (30 treatment group, 21 sham group) and 84 in prospective, single-arm studies. Linear mixed models showed an advantage for the treatment group for the BMRC (7 days: OR 3.28; 95%CI: 1.08-9.99; 3 months: OR 2.03, 95%CI: 0.65-6.39) and KPS (7 days: mean difference (MD) 11, 95%CI: 2-19; 3 months: MD 11, 95%CI: 2-20), less pronounced for the FMA (7 days: MD 0.28, 95%CI: -0.34-0.9; 3 months: MD 0.14, 95%CI: -0.52-0.81). A stronger treatment effect was evident with proven ischemia on the postoperative MRI. To observe an improvement by at least one grade at 3 months, the number needed to treat (NNT) for the entire cohort is 4 (BMRC) and 3 patients (KPS), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our multicenter data confirm the positive treatment effect of nrTMS to reduce transcallosal inhibition with a considerably low NNT - especially if caused by ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"417-428"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04931-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Recently, reduction of transcallosal inhibition by contralateral navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrTMS) improved neurorehabilitation of glioma patients with new postoperative paresis. This multicentric study examines the effect of postoperative nrTMS in brain tumor patients to treat surgery-related upper extremity paresis.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of two randomized and three one-arm studies in brain tumor patients with new/progressive postoperative paresis. Patients underwent either low frequency contralesional nrTMS or sham stimulation followed by physiotherapy. Outcome was assessed on postoperative day 1, 7, and after 3 months using British Medical Research Council score (BMRC), Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).

Results: A total of 135 patients (mean age of 53.8 years, 60 women) were included, of whom 51 patients were treated in RCTs (30 treatment group, 21 sham group) and 84 in prospective, single-arm studies. Linear mixed models showed an advantage for the treatment group for the BMRC (7 days: OR 3.28; 95%CI: 1.08-9.99; 3 months: OR 2.03, 95%CI: 0.65-6.39) and KPS (7 days: mean difference (MD) 11, 95%CI: 2-19; 3 months: MD 11, 95%CI: 2-20), less pronounced for the FMA (7 days: MD 0.28, 95%CI: -0.34-0.9; 3 months: MD 0.14, 95%CI: -0.52-0.81). A stronger treatment effect was evident with proven ischemia on the postoperative MRI. To observe an improvement by at least one grade at 3 months, the number needed to treat (NNT) for the entire cohort is 4 (BMRC) and 3 patients (KPS), respectively.

Conclusion: Our multicenter data confirm the positive treatment effect of nrTMS to reduce transcallosal inhibition with a considerably low NNT - especially if caused by ischemia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅磁刺激改善脑肿瘤患者术后瘫瘫。
背景和目的:最近,通过对侧导航重复经颅磁刺激(nrTMS)减少经胼胝体抑制可以改善胶质瘤术后新发瘫患者的神经康复。这项多中心研究探讨了脑肿瘤患者术后nrTMS治疗手术相关性上肢瘫的效果。方法:这是对两项随机研究和三项单臂研究的二次分析,研究对象为脑肿瘤术后新发/进展性麻痹患者。患者接受低频对侧nrTMS或假刺激后进行物理治疗。采用英国医学研究委员会评分(BMRC)、Fugl-Meyer评估(FMA)、Karnofsky绩效量表(KPS)和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)在术后第1天、第7天和第3个月评估结果。结果:共纳入135例患者(平均年龄53.8岁,60名女性),其中51例患者接受随机对照试验(治疗组30例,假手术组21例),84例接受前瞻性单臂研究。线性混合模型显示,治疗组在BMRC方面具有优势(7天:OR 3.28;95%置信区间:1.08—-9.99;3个月:OR 2.03, 95%CI: 0.65-6.39)和KPS(7天:平均差异(MD) 11, 95%CI: 2-19;3个月:MD 11, 95%CI: 2-20), FMA不明显(7天:MD 0.28, 95%CI: -0.34-0.9;3个月:MD 0.14, 95%CI: -0.52-0.81)。术后MRI证实缺血后治疗效果明显。为了在3个月时观察到至少一个等级的改善,整个队列中需要治疗的患者(NNT)分别为4例(BMRC)和3例(KPS)。结论:我们的多中心数据证实了nrTMS对减少经胼胝体抑制的积极治疗作用,特别是在NNT相当低的情况下-特别是在缺血引起的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Prognostic relevance and cytokine correlates of peripheral immune subpopulations in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro-oncology in 2026: integrating molecular definition with image-guided intervention. Cesium-131 brachytherapy for central nervous system salvage therapy. Novel cilengitide derivatives suppress migration and invasion of temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma cells via MAPK/Akt pathway inhibition. Cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA as a prognostic and disease-activity biomarker in leptomeningeal metastases: systematic review, meta-analysis, and implications for CSF-guided care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1