Psychosocial moderators of the association between pain intensity and physical function in people with systemic sclerosis.

Daniel Whibley, Deeba Minhas, John A Sturgeon, Yen T Chen, Anna Kratz, Dinesh Khanna, Susan L Murphy
{"title":"Psychosocial moderators of the association between pain intensity and physical function in people with systemic sclerosis.","authors":"Daniel Whibley, Deeba Minhas, John A Sturgeon, Yen T Chen, Anna Kratz, Dinesh Khanna, Susan L Murphy","doi":"10.1177/23971983241312542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is a prevalent symptom of systemic sclerosis. While previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between higher pain intensity and lower physical function in individuals with systemic sclerosis, the potentially moderating effect of psychosocial factors on the association has yet to be explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data from a fatigue self-management trial for adults with systemic sclerosis. Baseline questionnaire instruments measured pain intensity (11-point scale), physical function (PROMIS 4a short form), and psychosocial factors: positive and negative affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), anxiety, depression (PROMIS short forms), and self-efficacy domains (PROMIS item banks). Linear regression quantified the pain intensity-physical function association with interaction terms for candidate psychosocial moderators included in separate models (adjusted for age, systemic sclerosis subtype, and disease duration).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 173 participants (mean age 54.5, Standard Deviation 11.7, 93% female, 83% White), 47% had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, 35% limited, 13% overlap, and 5% other/unsure. Mean pain intensity was 4.9 (Standard Deviation 2.3) and mean physical function T-score was 38.5 (Standard Deviation 6.4). Pain intensity accounted for 31% of the variability in physical function (B -1.34, 95% confidence interval -1.69, -0.99). Statistically significant interactions were found between pain intensity and negative affect and anxiety, with higher levels of these factors amplifying the negative pain-physical function association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that higher levels of negative affect and anxiety exacerbate the negative effect of pain on physical function in individuals with systemic sclerosis. Interventions targeting these factors may help improve overall physical function regardless of pain intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"23971983241312542"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983241312542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain is a prevalent symptom of systemic sclerosis. While previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between higher pain intensity and lower physical function in individuals with systemic sclerosis, the potentially moderating effect of psychosocial factors on the association has yet to be explored.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from a fatigue self-management trial for adults with systemic sclerosis. Baseline questionnaire instruments measured pain intensity (11-point scale), physical function (PROMIS 4a short form), and psychosocial factors: positive and negative affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), anxiety, depression (PROMIS short forms), and self-efficacy domains (PROMIS item banks). Linear regression quantified the pain intensity-physical function association with interaction terms for candidate psychosocial moderators included in separate models (adjusted for age, systemic sclerosis subtype, and disease duration).

Results: Among 173 participants (mean age 54.5, Standard Deviation 11.7, 93% female, 83% White), 47% had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, 35% limited, 13% overlap, and 5% other/unsure. Mean pain intensity was 4.9 (Standard Deviation 2.3) and mean physical function T-score was 38.5 (Standard Deviation 6.4). Pain intensity accounted for 31% of the variability in physical function (B -1.34, 95% confidence interval -1.69, -0.99). Statistically significant interactions were found between pain intensity and negative affect and anxiety, with higher levels of these factors amplifying the negative pain-physical function association.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that higher levels of negative affect and anxiety exacerbate the negative effect of pain on physical function in individuals with systemic sclerosis. Interventions targeting these factors may help improve overall physical function regardless of pain intensity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis: A critical review of knowledge gaps and opportunities. Psychosocial moderators of the association between pain intensity and physical function in people with systemic sclerosis. Evidence for targeting autonomic dysfunction in systemic sclerosis: A scoping review. Systemic sclerosis-associated severe gastric antral vascular ectasia treated with tocilizumab:A case report and review of the literature. Longitudinal association between nailfold capillaroscopy and incident interstitial lung disease: A EUSTAR database analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1