Clara Amat-Fernandez, Olatz Garin, Ricardo Luer-Aguila, Yolanda Pardo, Renata Briseño, Catalina Lizano-Barrantes, Leslye Rojas-Concha, Melissa S Y Thong, Giovanni Apolone, Cinzia Brunelli, Augusto Caraceni, Norbert Couespel, Nanne Bos, Mogens Groenvold, Stein Kaasa, Gennaro Ciliberto, Claudio Lombardo, Ricardo Pietrobon, Gabriella Pravettoni, Aude Sirven, Hugo Vachon, Alexandra Gilbert, Galina Velikova, Montse Ferrer
{"title":"Systematic review of the needs and health-related quality of life domains relevant to people surviving cancer in Europe.","authors":"Clara Amat-Fernandez, Olatz Garin, Ricardo Luer-Aguila, Yolanda Pardo, Renata Briseño, Catalina Lizano-Barrantes, Leslye Rojas-Concha, Melissa S Y Thong, Giovanni Apolone, Cinzia Brunelli, Augusto Caraceni, Norbert Couespel, Nanne Bos, Mogens Groenvold, Stein Kaasa, Gennaro Ciliberto, Claudio Lombardo, Ricardo Pietrobon, Gabriella Pravettoni, Aude Sirven, Hugo Vachon, Alexandra Gilbert, Galina Velikova, Montse Ferrer","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03884-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To systematically review qualitative studies on outcomes, needs, experiences, preferences, concerns and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people surviving cancer in Europe in the last decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Protocol registered ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO , ID575065).</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>studies with qualitative methods, constructs related to HRQoL, and adults surviving cancer in Europe. The search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus since 2013. Abstracts and full text were revised, data extracted and study risk of bias assessed independently by two researchers. The primary outcomes were the themes arising from each study. A thematic analysis stratified according to the study objective was undertaken by grouping themes into categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18,256 articles identified, 43 fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 16 studies with a generic objective and 27 with specific objectives. Seven categories (57 themes) emerged from the studies with a generic focus: Clinical Management (n = 16), Symptoms and Physical Function (n = 5), Psychological Function (n = 21), Social Function (n = 18), HRQoL (n = 3), Life Disruption (n = 6), and Individual Factors (n = 1). The 12 studies focused on treatment and care experiences stand out among those with specific objectives, with most themes fitting into the same seven categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results clearly showed the predominance of the social and psychological function domains over physical domains among people surviving cancer, additionally identifying specific needs in clinical management, such as information and communication, and relationship with and support from professionals. Therefore, these aspects should be incorporated into the evaluation of patient-centred initiatives for people surviving cancer.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>only two databases were searched, and most European countries were not represented.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03884-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To systematically review qualitative studies on outcomes, needs, experiences, preferences, concerns and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people surviving cancer in Europe in the last decade.
Inclusion criteria: studies with qualitative methods, constructs related to HRQoL, and adults surviving cancer in Europe. The search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus since 2013. Abstracts and full text were revised, data extracted and study risk of bias assessed independently by two researchers. The primary outcomes were the themes arising from each study. A thematic analysis stratified according to the study objective was undertaken by grouping themes into categories.
Results: Of 18,256 articles identified, 43 fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 16 studies with a generic objective and 27 with specific objectives. Seven categories (57 themes) emerged from the studies with a generic focus: Clinical Management (n = 16), Symptoms and Physical Function (n = 5), Psychological Function (n = 21), Social Function (n = 18), HRQoL (n = 3), Life Disruption (n = 6), and Individual Factors (n = 1). The 12 studies focused on treatment and care experiences stand out among those with specific objectives, with most themes fitting into the same seven categories.
Conclusions: Results clearly showed the predominance of the social and psychological function domains over physical domains among people surviving cancer, additionally identifying specific needs in clinical management, such as information and communication, and relationship with and support from professionals. Therefore, these aspects should be incorporated into the evaluation of patient-centred initiatives for people surviving cancer.
Limitations: only two databases were searched, and most European countries were not represented.
期刊介绍:
Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences.
Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership.
This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.