Elevated estradiol in a prepubertal female: within-laboratory systematic and practical interference screening.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1080/00365513.2025.2457113
Esra Yıldırım Demirçin, Sevilay Sezer, Gönül Büyükyılmaz, Gülsen Yılmaz
{"title":"Elevated estradiol in a prepubertal female: within-laboratory systematic and practical interference screening.","authors":"Esra Yıldırım Demirçin, Sevilay Sezer, Gönül Büyükyılmaz, Gülsen Yılmaz","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2457113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analytical errors related to endogenous or exogenous substances are a cause of unnecessary investigation, intervention, and patient concern especially in immunoassay platforms. In this report, we systematically screened for estradiol interference using a practical algorithm. For extended research in interference screening, repeated estradiol measurements for control and case samples were carried out for method comparison (three immunoassay platforms and one liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measurement), dilution test, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, and heterophile antibody blocking tube. When serial dilutions were applied to the sample, a deviation from linearity was observed when compared to the control sample. With PEG precipitation, the recovery rate of 63%. While the patient's serum estradiol value was 389.02 pmol/L using the Siemens Atellica immunoassay method, the same sample was <36.7 pmol/L in the Abbott immunoassay method and 34.9 pmol/L in the Roche immunoassay platform. Applying the LC-MS/MS method, the patient had a serum estradiol of 3.33 pmol/L. Immunoassays are susceptible to interferences that can cause high estimates due to cross-reactivity. Therefore, LC-MS/MS may be more suitable than immunoassays for preventing misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatments, especially for children.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2457113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analytical errors related to endogenous or exogenous substances are a cause of unnecessary investigation, intervention, and patient concern especially in immunoassay platforms. In this report, we systematically screened for estradiol interference using a practical algorithm. For extended research in interference screening, repeated estradiol measurements for control and case samples were carried out for method comparison (three immunoassay platforms and one liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measurement), dilution test, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, and heterophile antibody blocking tube. When serial dilutions were applied to the sample, a deviation from linearity was observed when compared to the control sample. With PEG precipitation, the recovery rate of 63%. While the patient's serum estradiol value was 389.02 pmol/L using the Siemens Atellica immunoassay method, the same sample was <36.7 pmol/L in the Abbott immunoassay method and 34.9 pmol/L in the Roche immunoassay platform. Applying the LC-MS/MS method, the patient had a serum estradiol of 3.33 pmol/L. Immunoassays are susceptible to interferences that can cause high estimates due to cross-reactivity. Therefore, LC-MS/MS may be more suitable than immunoassays for preventing misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatments, especially for children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
升高estradıol ın为青春期前女性:wıthın-laboratory systematıc和practıcal ınterference screenıng。
与内源性或外源性物质相关的分析错误是不必要的调查、干预和患者关注的原因,特别是在免疫测定平台。在本报告中,我们使用实用的算法系统地筛选雌二醇干扰。为了扩展干扰筛选的研究,对对照和病例样本进行了重复的雌二醇测量,以进行方法比较(三个免疫分析平台和一个液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS/MS)测量),稀释试验,聚乙二醇(PEG)沉淀和异源性抗体阻断管。当对样品进行连续稀释时,与对照样品相比,观察到线性偏差。采用聚乙二醇沉淀法,回收率为63%。而采用Siemens Atellica免疫分析法检测患者血清雌二醇值为389.02 pmol/L,同一样品为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
期刊最新文献
Associations between snus use and concentrations of CRP, 25(OH)D and testosterone: a population-based study. Reference intervals for lysosomal glucocerebrosidase activity in the healthy population. The association between ionized and total magnesium in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study. Patterns of phlebotomy service use in Northern Finland: heavy utilization of laboratory services. Managing demand for the direct antiglobulin test with a big data-derived predictive equation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1