Correlation between p53 immunoexpression and TP53 mutation status in extrapulmonary small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and its association with patient survival.
Klára Pavlíčková, Jan Hojný, Petr Waldauf, Pavel Dundr, Nikola Hájková, Marián Švajdler, Pavel Fabian, Iva Staniczková Zambo, Miroslava Flídrová, Jan Laco, Helena Hornychová, Patricie Delongová, Jozef Škarda, Jan Hrudka, Radoslav Matěj
{"title":"Correlation between p53 immunoexpression and TP53 mutation status in extrapulmonary small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and its association with patient survival.","authors":"Klára Pavlíčková, Jan Hojný, Petr Waldauf, Pavel Dundr, Nikola Hájková, Marián Švajdler, Pavel Fabian, Iva Staniczková Zambo, Miroslava Flídrová, Jan Laco, Helena Hornychová, Patricie Delongová, Jozef Škarda, Jan Hrudka, Radoslav Matěj","doi":"10.1007/s00428-025-04024-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extrapulmonary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-SCNC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Despite its morphological similarity to lung small cell carcinomas, its oncogenesis remains uncertain. One hundred and seventy-one EP-SCNC were enrolled in a multicenter study, and all tissue samples underwent an immunohistochemical p53 analysis. One hundred twenty-five samples were molecularly analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS), comprising DNA and RNA analysis. p53 normal/wild type expression was detected in 68 cases (39.8%), whereas aberrant expression was detected in 103 cases (60.2%). Molecular TP53 alteration was detected in 92 out of 125 tumors (73.6%). The TP53 mutation was shown to be prognostic and associated with shorter overall survival (p = 0.041). The multivariate analysis of p53 and TP53 mutational status found that it impacted overall survival relative to distinct sites of tumor locations (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively). Age did not influenced survival in the multivariate analysis of p53 and TP53 (p = 0.002; p < 0.001 resp.). Among tumors with paired immunohistochemical and molecular results, 108 exhibited concordance between the immunohistochemical and molecular analysis, whereas 17 were discordant. Accordingly, p53 aberrant expression was tightly associated with a TP53 mutation (p < 0.001). In discordant cases, molecular analysis revealed no alteration in three tumors with p53 overexpression. In contrast, in 14 tumors with wild-type p53 expression, TP53 genetic alteration was detected. Possible causes of discordance are discussed in this manuscript. Furthermore, the incidence of aberrant p53 expression / TP53 molecular alteration was noticeably lower in EP-SCNC than in small-cell lung carcinomas. Therefore, in EP-SCNC, other driver mutations should be sought since personalized therapy can improve patient prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04024-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Extrapulmonary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-SCNC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Despite its morphological similarity to lung small cell carcinomas, its oncogenesis remains uncertain. One hundred and seventy-one EP-SCNC were enrolled in a multicenter study, and all tissue samples underwent an immunohistochemical p53 analysis. One hundred twenty-five samples were molecularly analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS), comprising DNA and RNA analysis. p53 normal/wild type expression was detected in 68 cases (39.8%), whereas aberrant expression was detected in 103 cases (60.2%). Molecular TP53 alteration was detected in 92 out of 125 tumors (73.6%). The TP53 mutation was shown to be prognostic and associated with shorter overall survival (p = 0.041). The multivariate analysis of p53 and TP53 mutational status found that it impacted overall survival relative to distinct sites of tumor locations (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively). Age did not influenced survival in the multivariate analysis of p53 and TP53 (p = 0.002; p < 0.001 resp.). Among tumors with paired immunohistochemical and molecular results, 108 exhibited concordance between the immunohistochemical and molecular analysis, whereas 17 were discordant. Accordingly, p53 aberrant expression was tightly associated with a TP53 mutation (p < 0.001). In discordant cases, molecular analysis revealed no alteration in three tumors with p53 overexpression. In contrast, in 14 tumors with wild-type p53 expression, TP53 genetic alteration was detected. Possible causes of discordance are discussed in this manuscript. Furthermore, the incidence of aberrant p53 expression / TP53 molecular alteration was noticeably lower in EP-SCNC than in small-cell lung carcinomas. Therefore, in EP-SCNC, other driver mutations should be sought since personalized therapy can improve patient prognosis.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.