The Implementation of a Feeding Protocol in Patients With Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Enteral Nutrition: The NIVEN Study.

IF 2.1 Q1 Nursing Hospital pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2024-007810
Javier Rodriguez-Fanjul, Clara Sorribes Ortí, Ana Santos Monton, Carlos Rodrigo Gonzalo de Liria, Maria Mendez Hernandez, Pilar Ricart Marti, Iuri Corsini, Iolanda Jordan Garcia, Monica Balaguer Gargallo
{"title":"The Implementation of a Feeding Protocol in Patients With Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Enteral Nutrition: The NIVEN Study.","authors":"Javier Rodriguez-Fanjul, Clara Sorribes Ortí, Ana Santos Monton, Carlos Rodrigo Gonzalo de Liria, Maria Mendez Hernandez, Pilar Ricart Marti, Iuri Corsini, Iolanda Jordan Garcia, Monica Balaguer Gargallo","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-007810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is limited evidence to guide the treatment of enteral nutrition (EN) for children with bronchiolitis who receive biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement project included patients with bronchiolitis who were supported by BiPAP ventilation. An algorithm to increase EN treatment in those patients was created by stakeholders. Two periods of time were compared: group 1 (January 2023 to August 2023) without nutrition implementation protocol vs group 2 (September 2023 to February 2024) after the protocol was implemented. EN was provided via nasogastric tubes. The project aim was to decrease the mean time to initiation of EN by 50% after the start of BiPAP. Secondary end points were time to reach target calories (100 kcal/kg/d), BiPAP total duration, and the proportion of patients with adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 102 included patients (48 before and 54 after BiPAP ventilation), the median time to the start of EN decreased from 18 (8-26) hours to 6 (2-8) hours (P < 0.05) Median time to reach calorie goal decreased from 103 (85-120) hours to 48 hours (36-60) (P < 0.05). There were no differences in noninvasive ventilation mean duration. No episodes of aspiration or other adverse effects were documented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a standardized pathway for EN in patients with BiPAP was associated with faster initiation of EN and a shorter time to reaching caloric goals without any observed adverse events. Although our sample was small, the findings suggest that more aggressive enteral feeding should be considered in patients receiving noninvasive ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"135-141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-007810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is limited evidence to guide the treatment of enteral nutrition (EN) for children with bronchiolitis who receive biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) support.

Methods: This quality improvement project included patients with bronchiolitis who were supported by BiPAP ventilation. An algorithm to increase EN treatment in those patients was created by stakeholders. Two periods of time were compared: group 1 (January 2023 to August 2023) without nutrition implementation protocol vs group 2 (September 2023 to February 2024) after the protocol was implemented. EN was provided via nasogastric tubes. The project aim was to decrease the mean time to initiation of EN by 50% after the start of BiPAP. Secondary end points were time to reach target calories (100 kcal/kg/d), BiPAP total duration, and the proportion of patients with adverse effects.

Results: For the 102 included patients (48 before and 54 after BiPAP ventilation), the median time to the start of EN decreased from 18 (8-26) hours to 6 (2-8) hours (P < 0.05) Median time to reach calorie goal decreased from 103 (85-120) hours to 48 hours (36-60) (P < 0.05). There were no differences in noninvasive ventilation mean duration. No episodes of aspiration or other adverse effects were documented.

Conclusions: The implementation of a standardized pathway for EN in patients with BiPAP was associated with faster initiation of EN and a shorter time to reaching caloric goals without any observed adverse events. Although our sample was small, the findings suggest that more aggressive enteral feeding should be considered in patients receiving noninvasive ventilation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无创通气患者喂养方案的实施改善肠内营养:NIVEN研究。
目的:指导接受双相气道正压通气(BiPAP)支持的毛细支气管炎患儿肠内营养(EN)治疗的证据有限。方法:本质量改善项目纳入BiPAP通气支持的毛细支气管炎患者。利益相关者创建了一个算法来增加这些患者的EN治疗。比较两个时间段:没有营养实施方案的第1组(2023年1月至2023年8月)与实施方案后的第2组(2023年9月至2024年2月)。EN通过鼻胃管提供。该项目的目标是在BiPAP开始后将EN启动的平均时间缩短50%。次要终点是达到目标热量(100 kcal/kg/d)的时间、BiPAP总持续时间和不良反应患者的比例。结果:102例纳入的患者(BiPAP通气前48例,通气后54例),到EN开始的中位时间从18(8-26)小时减少到6(2-8)小时(P结论:在BiPAP患者中实施标准化的EN途径与更快的EN开始和更短的时间达到热量目标相关,且没有观察到任何不良事件。虽然我们的样本很小,但研究结果表明,在接受无创通气的患者中,应考虑更积极的肠内喂养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
期刊最新文献
A Mother's Calling: Interdisciplinary, Trauma-Informed Care for Lead Poisoning. Characteristics of Pediatric Patients Admitted by Telehospitalist to Community Hospitals. Reimagining Access: Telehospitalist Models for Pediatric Community Care. Blood Culture Contamination and Subsequent Unnecessary Health Care Utilization in Pediatrics. Impact of Order Set Design on Pediatric Intravenous Fluid Guideline Adherence: A National Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1