Optimising Asthma Self-Management: Preliminary Validation of an Arabic Version of the Inhaler Technique Questionnaire.

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13010006
Malath Al-Juhaishi, Chiao Xin Lim, Ieva Stupans, Wejdan Shahin, Thilini R Thrimawithana, Vincent Chan
{"title":"Optimising Asthma Self-Management: Preliminary Validation of an Arabic Version of the Inhaler Technique Questionnaire.","authors":"Malath Al-Juhaishi, Chiao Xin Lim, Ieva Stupans, Wejdan Shahin, Thilini R Thrimawithana, Vincent Chan","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Correct inhaler technique is vital for managing respiratory conditions like asthma. Patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are at higher risk of sub-optimal adherence and errors in inhaler technique. This study aimed to validate an Arabic version of the inhaler technique questionnaire for self-assessment of the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) technique by assessing agreement between observed and self-reported techniques among Arabic-speaking individuals with asthma in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational assessments of 30 participants using an MDI, followed by completion of the translated inhaler technique questionnaire by the same participants. The questionnaire comprised nine questions pertaining to the inhaler technique. The level of agreement between the observed and self-reported technique for each of the nine MDI technique steps was subsequently determined using intraclass correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of participants were women, aged 25-44 years (70%). An overall Kappa score of 0.768 indicated good agreement between observed and self-reported datasets, with stepwise agreement ranging from 52.4-100%. Steps involving taking a big breath before inhaler use (step 2) and exhaling slowly (step 8) were the least well correlated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preliminary validated MDI inhaler technique questionnaire may be used as a self-assessment tool by Arabic speakers, aiding healthcare professionals, and empowering individuals living with asthma to self-manage their condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Correct inhaler technique is vital for managing respiratory conditions like asthma. Patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are at higher risk of sub-optimal adherence and errors in inhaler technique. This study aimed to validate an Arabic version of the inhaler technique questionnaire for self-assessment of the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) technique by assessing agreement between observed and self-reported techniques among Arabic-speaking individuals with asthma in Australia.

Methods: Observational assessments of 30 participants using an MDI, followed by completion of the translated inhaler technique questionnaire by the same participants. The questionnaire comprised nine questions pertaining to the inhaler technique. The level of agreement between the observed and self-reported technique for each of the nine MDI technique steps was subsequently determined using intraclass correlation.

Results: The majority of participants were women, aged 25-44 years (70%). An overall Kappa score of 0.768 indicated good agreement between observed and self-reported datasets, with stepwise agreement ranging from 52.4-100%. Steps involving taking a big breath before inhaler use (step 2) and exhaling slowly (step 8) were the least well correlated.

Conclusions: The preliminary validated MDI inhaler technique questionnaire may be used as a self-assessment tool by Arabic speakers, aiding healthcare professionals, and empowering individuals living with asthma to self-manage their condition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化哮喘自我管理:阿拉伯语版吸入器技术问卷的初步验证。
背景:正确的吸入器技术对于治疗哮喘等呼吸系统疾病至关重要。来自不同文化和语言背景的患者在吸入器技术上的次优依从性和错误的风险更高。本研究旨在通过评估在澳大利亚讲阿拉伯语的哮喘患者中观察到的技术和自我报告的技术之间的一致性,验证用于计量吸入器(MDI)技术自我评估的吸入器技术问卷的阿拉伯语版本。方法:对使用MDI的30名参与者进行观察性评估,随后由相同参与者完成翻译的吸入器技术问卷。问卷包括九个与吸入器技术有关的问题。9个MDI技术步骤中观察到的和自我报告的技术之间的一致性水平随后使用类内相关性确定。结果:大多数参与者为女性,年龄在25-44岁之间(70%)。总体Kappa得分为0.768,表明观察数据集与自我报告数据集之间具有良好的一致性,逐步一致性范围为52.4-100%。使用吸入器前深吸一口气(步骤2)和缓慢呼气(步骤8)的相关程度最低。结论:初步验证的MDI吸入器技术问卷可以作为阿拉伯语使用者的自我评估工具,帮助医疗保健专业人员,并使哮喘患者能够自我管理自己的病情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
PharmReaDy: A Longitudinal Platform for Industry Career Preparation for Student Pharmacists in the U.S. Self-Management, Adherence, and the Role of Pharmaceutical Care in Patients with T2DM in Primary Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Bulgaria. AIM (Analyze-Interpret-Manage): A Novel NAPLEX-Aligned Analytical Assessment Framework for Measuring Individual and Team Critical Thinking Using Generative AI. Pharmacist-Led Flu Vaccination Services in Romanian Community Pharmacies: Barriers, Perceptions, and Implementation Challenges. Impact of a Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Service (PADLS) on Hospitalized Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1