Adding Semi Elemental Enteral Nutrition Formula Improves Tolerance Without Compromising Bowel Preparation Quality for Colonoscopy: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1002/wjs.12490
Nabil Mohammad Azmi, Anith Nadzira, Nur Afdzillah Abdul Rahman, Zairul Azwan Mohd Azman, Soma Balaganapati Chandrakanthan, Diana Melissa Dualim, Ismail Sagap
{"title":"Adding Semi Elemental Enteral Nutrition Formula Improves Tolerance Without Compromising Bowel Preparation Quality for Colonoscopy: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Nabil Mohammad Azmi, Anith Nadzira, Nur Afdzillah Abdul Rahman, Zairul Azwan Mohd Azman, Soma Balaganapati Chandrakanthan, Diana Melissa Dualim, Ismail Sagap","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aims conventional bowel preparation restricts dietary intake up to 72 h prior to colonoscopy. Bowel preparation process is often perceived as unpleasant leading to poor compliance and subsequent poor bowel preparation. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy of low-residue semi-elemental enteral formula (LREF) incorporated diet versus the standard diet in polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based bowel preparation in the aim of creating a more tolerable bowel preparation regimen without compromising bowel cleanliness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled noninferiority trial. The noninferiority margin was set at 15%. One hundred sixty-seven patients were recruited and randomized to either the LREF group or the standard diet (SD) group using a 3L PEG preparation regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LREF group results in comparable satisfactory preparation rating to the standard diet group with a mean BPPS score of 6.87 (SD 1.59) versus 7.14 (SD 1.54) (95% CI[-0.86; 0.32] and p = 0.367). The mean difference (MD) of the BBPS total score between the two groups was -0.27 (95% CI [-0.764 and 0.224]). Equivalence were demonstrated using the two one-sided test (alpha = 5%) with the lower t-value of 2.682 (p = 0.0042) and the upper t-value of -4.493 (p < 0.01). There was also no significant difference in PEG compliance, willingness to repeat the procedure and tolerance to the bowel preparation between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LREF incorporated diet is equivalent to regimen in achieving satisfactory bowel cleanliness in patients undergoing PEG-based bowel preparation. We suggest that a LREF incorporated regimen for bowel preparation can be considered in patients who are unable to sustain prolonged fasting to improve the procedural experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"576-583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aims conventional bowel preparation restricts dietary intake up to 72 h prior to colonoscopy. Bowel preparation process is often perceived as unpleasant leading to poor compliance and subsequent poor bowel preparation. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy of low-residue semi-elemental enteral formula (LREF) incorporated diet versus the standard diet in polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based bowel preparation in the aim of creating a more tolerable bowel preparation regimen without compromising bowel cleanliness.

Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled noninferiority trial. The noninferiority margin was set at 15%. One hundred sixty-seven patients were recruited and randomized to either the LREF group or the standard diet (SD) group using a 3L PEG preparation regimen.

Results: The LREF group results in comparable satisfactory preparation rating to the standard diet group with a mean BPPS score of 6.87 (SD 1.59) versus 7.14 (SD 1.54) (95% CI[-0.86; 0.32] and p = 0.367). The mean difference (MD) of the BBPS total score between the two groups was -0.27 (95% CI [-0.764 and 0.224]). Equivalence were demonstrated using the two one-sided test (alpha = 5%) with the lower t-value of 2.682 (p = 0.0042) and the upper t-value of -4.493 (p < 0.01). There was also no significant difference in PEG compliance, willingness to repeat the procedure and tolerance to the bowel preparation between the two groups.

Conclusion: The LREF incorporated diet is equivalent to regimen in achieving satisfactory bowel cleanliness in patients undergoing PEG-based bowel preparation. We suggest that a LREF incorporated regimen for bowel preparation can be considered in patients who are unable to sustain prolonged fasting to improve the procedural experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
添加半元素肠内营养配方提高耐受性,同时不影响结肠镜检查的肠准备质量:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
背景:目的:常规肠道准备限制结肠镜检查前72小时的饮食摄入。肠道准备过程通常被认为是不愉快的,导致依从性差和随后的肠道准备不良。本试验的目的是比较低残留半元素肠内配方(LREF)结合饮食与基于聚乙二醇(PEG)的标准饮食的功效,目的是创造一种更耐受的肠道准备方案,同时不影响肠道清洁。方法:这是一项多中心、前瞻性、单盲、随机对照的非劣效性试验。非劣效性裕度设为15%。167名患者被招募并随机分为LREF组或标准饮食(SD)组,使用3L PEG准备方案。结果:LREF组与标准饮食组相比,BPPS平均评分为6.87 (SD 1.59)比7.14 (SD 1.54) (95% CI[-0.86;0.32]和p = 0.367)。两组患者BBPS总分的平均差异(MD)为-0.27 (95% CI[-0.764和0.224])。通过双单侧检验(alpha = 5%)证明了等效性,t值较低为2.682 (p = 0.0042), t值较高为-4.493 (p)。结论:在接受peg肠道准备的患者中,LREF纳入饮食与方案在获得令人满意的肠道清洁方面是相当的。我们建议,对于无法维持长时间禁食的患者,可以考虑将LREF纳入肠道准备方案,以改善手术体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
Can Desmoplastic Stromal Reaction Guide the Extent of Lymph Node Surgery in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma? Beyond Immunosuppression: Defining Perioperative Risk in Transplant Patients Undergoing Colorectal and Small Bowel Surgery. Incidence and Risk Factors of Postoperative Urinary Retention After Thyroidectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ERAS-Based Surgical Bundles and Anastomotic Leakage: Which Components Drive the Effect? Advancing Minimally Invasive Surgical Education in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: How I Learned Laparoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1