Fostering effective hybrid human-LLM reasoning and decision making.

IF 4.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-01-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2024.1464690
Andrea Passerini, Aryo Gema, Pasquale Minervini, Burcu Sayin, Katya Tentori
{"title":"Fostering effective hybrid human-LLM reasoning and decision making.","authors":"Andrea Passerini, Aryo Gema, Pasquale Minervini, Burcu Sayin, Katya Tentori","doi":"10.3389/frai.2024.1464690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impressive performance of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) across a wide range of tasks, along with their often non-trivial errors, has garnered unprecedented attention regarding the potential of AI and its impact on everyday life. While considerable effort has been and continues to be dedicated to overcoming the limitations of current models, the potentials and risks of human-LLM collaboration remain largely underexplored. In this perspective, we argue that enhancing the focus on human-LLM interaction should be a primary target for future LLM research. Specifically, we will briefly examine some of the biases that may hinder effective collaboration between humans and machines, explore potential solutions, and discuss two broader goals-mutual understanding and complementary team performance-that, in our view, future research should address to enhance effective human-LLM reasoning and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 ","pages":"1464690"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1464690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impressive performance of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) across a wide range of tasks, along with their often non-trivial errors, has garnered unprecedented attention regarding the potential of AI and its impact on everyday life. While considerable effort has been and continues to be dedicated to overcoming the limitations of current models, the potentials and risks of human-LLM collaboration remain largely underexplored. In this perspective, we argue that enhancing the focus on human-LLM interaction should be a primary target for future LLM research. Specifically, we will briefly examine some of the biases that may hinder effective collaboration between humans and machines, explore potential solutions, and discuss two broader goals-mutual understanding and complementary team performance-that, in our view, future research should address to enhance effective human-LLM reasoning and decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养有效的混合人-法学硕士推理和决策。
现代大型语言模型(llm)在广泛任务中的令人印象深刻的表现,以及它们经常出现的重大错误,已经引起了人们对人工智能潜力及其对日常生活影响的前所未有的关注。虽然已经并将继续致力于克服当前模型的局限性,但人类与法学硕士合作的潜力和风险在很大程度上仍未得到充分发掘。从这个角度来看,我们认为加强对人与法学硕士互动的关注应该是未来法学硕士研究的主要目标。具体来说,我们将简要地研究一些可能阻碍人与机器之间有效合作的偏见,探索潜在的解决方案,并讨论两个更广泛的目标——相互理解和互补的团队绩效——在我们看来,未来的研究应该致力于提高有效的人类法学硕士推理和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A framework for causal concept-based model explanations. The future of fundamental science led by generative closed-loop artificial intelligence. The association between national culture and AI readiness: a cross-national study. Digital twin simulations of theory-driven crisis messaging during hurricane evacuations in synthetic populations: a Miami-Dade County case study. Transformer-based deep learning approach for obstructive sleep apnea detection using single-lead ECG.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1