Lauren Ng, Eddie Donaghy, John Conway, Stewart W Mercer
{"title":"Staff and service user perspectives of a co-located homelessness centre in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation.","authors":"Lauren Ng, Eddie Donaghy, John Conway, Stewart W Mercer","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-location and integration of services within a psychologically-informed environment is recommended for people experiencing homeless but there are few examples of this in the UK. Such a centre opened in Scotland in November 2021.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate progress of the new centre.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Mixed-methods pre-post-test design before (baseline) and two years after (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Baseline and follow-up staff surveys measured knowledge of trauma-informed care, well-being, team climate, and job satisfaction. The follow-up staff survey also evaluated staff support and service improvements. In-depth staff interviews were conducted at baseline (<i>n</i>=25) and follow-up and analysed thematically. A service users survey was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The staff survey showed significant improvements between baseline and follow-up in trauma-informed care, burnout, and team climate, together with improvements in support, service integration, and service user care. Service users reported high satisfaction with the new centre.Staff interviews identified a more psychologically-informed environment, better staff support, and improved opportunistic multidisciplinary working over the two years of the centre opening. However, a number of barriers were also identified relating to the building and the IT systems. Further work on the centre's vision; short- and long-term integration plans; workload, and sustainability were felt to be needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-location of services for people experiencing homelessness in Scotland has led to improvements in staff burn-out and team climate, and service users' satisfaction over the first two years of opening. However, barriers remain and full integration requires a clearer vision and 'road map', requiring collaborative leadership and sustainable funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Co-location and integration of services within a psychologically-informed environment is recommended for people experiencing homeless but there are few examples of this in the UK. Such a centre opened in Scotland in November 2021.
Aim: To evaluate progress of the new centre.
Design & setting: Mixed-methods pre-post-test design before (baseline) and two years after (follow-up).
Method: Baseline and follow-up staff surveys measured knowledge of trauma-informed care, well-being, team climate, and job satisfaction. The follow-up staff survey also evaluated staff support and service improvements. In-depth staff interviews were conducted at baseline (n=25) and follow-up and analysed thematically. A service users survey was also conducted.
Results: The staff survey showed significant improvements between baseline and follow-up in trauma-informed care, burnout, and team climate, together with improvements in support, service integration, and service user care. Service users reported high satisfaction with the new centre.Staff interviews identified a more psychologically-informed environment, better staff support, and improved opportunistic multidisciplinary working over the two years of the centre opening. However, a number of barriers were also identified relating to the building and the IT systems. Further work on the centre's vision; short- and long-term integration plans; workload, and sustainability were felt to be needed.
Conclusion: Co-location of services for people experiencing homelessness in Scotland has led to improvements in staff burn-out and team climate, and service users' satisfaction over the first two years of opening. However, barriers remain and full integration requires a clearer vision and 'road map', requiring collaborative leadership and sustainable funding.