Staff and service user perspectives of a co-located homelessness centre in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-10-27 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0198
Lauren Ng, Eddie Donaghy, John Conway, Stewart W Mercer
{"title":"Staff and service user perspectives of a co-located homelessness centre in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation.","authors":"Lauren Ng, Eddie Donaghy, John Conway, Stewart W Mercer","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-location and integration of services within a psychologically informed environment (PIE) is recommended for people experiencing homelessness (PEH) but there are few examples of this in the UK. Such a centre opened in Edinburgh, Scotland in November 2021.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate progress of the new centre.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>This was a mixed-methods pre-post-test design study before (baseline) and 2 years after (follow-up) the move to the new co-located centre. The study took place in Edinburgh, Scotland. The baseline evaluation was conducted at two separate homelessness services and the follow-up evaluation at the new co-located centre.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Baseline and follow-up staff surveys measured knowledge of trauma-informed care (TIC), wellbeing, team climate, and job satisfaction. The follow-up staff survey also evaluated staff support and service improvements. In-depth staff interviews were conducted at baseline (<i>n</i> = 25) and follow-up and analysed thematically. A service-user survey was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The staff survey showed significant improvements between baseline and follow-up in TIC, burnout, and team climate, together with improvements in support, service integration, and service-user care. Service users reported high satisfaction with the new centre. Staff interviews identified a more PIE, better staff support, and improved opportunistic multidisciplinary working over the 2 years of the centre opening. However, a number of barriers were also identified relating to the building and the IT systems. Further work on the centre's vision, short and long-term integration plans, workload, and sustainability were felt to be needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-location of services for PEH in Scotland has led to reductions in staff burnout and improvements in team climate and service users' satisfaction over the first 2 years of opening. However, barriers remain and full integration requires a clearer vision and 'roadmap', requiring collaborative leadership and sustainable funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12728856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Co-location and integration of services within a psychologically informed environment (PIE) is recommended for people experiencing homelessness (PEH) but there are few examples of this in the UK. Such a centre opened in Edinburgh, Scotland in November 2021.

Aim: To evaluate progress of the new centre.

Design & setting: This was a mixed-methods pre-post-test design study before (baseline) and 2 years after (follow-up) the move to the new co-located centre. The study took place in Edinburgh, Scotland. The baseline evaluation was conducted at two separate homelessness services and the follow-up evaluation at the new co-located centre.

Method: Baseline and follow-up staff surveys measured knowledge of trauma-informed care (TIC), wellbeing, team climate, and job satisfaction. The follow-up staff survey also evaluated staff support and service improvements. In-depth staff interviews were conducted at baseline (n = 25) and follow-up and analysed thematically. A service-user survey was also conducted.

Results: The staff survey showed significant improvements between baseline and follow-up in TIC, burnout, and team climate, together with improvements in support, service integration, and service-user care. Service users reported high satisfaction with the new centre. Staff interviews identified a more PIE, better staff support, and improved opportunistic multidisciplinary working over the 2 years of the centre opening. However, a number of barriers were also identified relating to the building and the IT systems. Further work on the centre's vision, short and long-term integration plans, workload, and sustainability were felt to be needed.

Conclusion: Co-location of services for PEH in Scotland has led to reductions in staff burnout and improvements in team climate and service users' satisfaction over the first 2 years of opening. However, barriers remain and full integration requires a clearer vision and 'roadmap', requiring collaborative leadership and sustainable funding.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰同一地点无家可归者中心的工作人员和服务使用者观点:混合方法评价。
背景:在一个心理知情的环境中,建议为无家可归的人提供托管和综合服务,但在英国很少有这样的例子。这样一个中心于2021年11月在苏格兰开放。目的:评价新中心的建设进展。设计与设置:试验前(基线)和试验后两年(随访)采用混合方法进行前后试验设计。方法:基线和随访员工调查测量创伤知情护理,幸福感,团队气氛和工作满意度的知识。后续工作人员调查也评价了工作人员支助和服务的改进。在基线(n=25)进行了深入的工作人员访谈,并进行了后续调查和专题分析。此外,还进行了服务使用者调查。结果:员工调查显示,在创伤知情护理、倦怠和团队氛围方面,基线和随访之间有显著改善,同时在支持、服务整合和服务用户护理方面也有改善。服务用户对新中心的满意度很高。工作人员采访发现,在中心开业的两年中,有一个更了解心理的环境,更好的工作人员支持和改进的机会性多学科工作。然而,也发现了一些与建筑和IT系统相关的障碍。关于中心愿景的进一步工作;短期和长期整合计划;他们认为需要工作量和可持续性。结论:在苏格兰,为无家可归者提供的服务在开业的头两年里,已经改善了员工倦怠和团队氛围,以及服务用户的满意度。然而,障碍仍然存在,全面一体化需要更清晰的愿景和“路线图”,需要协作领导和可持续供资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Co-locating frailty intervention activities and general practice: a qualitative study exploring experiences and perceptions of participants and delivery partners. Delivering a primary care review for people prescribed opioids for persistent pain: a qualitative study on the facilitators and barriers facing practice pharmacists. Accuracy and suitability of eating disorder screening tools for binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa in a primary care setting: a systematic review and narrative summary. The Hidden Workload Study protocol: a national mixed-methods analysis of general practice workload and local demographics. Assessing urgent medical cases in general practice: development of the ACUTE-GP instrument.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1