Preoperative posterior quadratus lumborum block: Determining the minimum effective ropivacaine concentration in 90% of patients (MEC90) for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic myomectomy.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101480
Liwei Wang, Yinyin Qu, Yuanli Dun, Xiaowen Wu, Yao Yao, Kun Zhang, Changyi Wu
{"title":"Preoperative posterior quadratus lumborum block: Determining the minimum effective ropivacaine concentration in 90% of patients (MEC90) for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic myomectomy.","authors":"Liwei Wang, Yinyin Qu, Yuanli Dun, Xiaowen Wu, Yao Yao, Kun Zhang, Changyi Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has gained traction as a regional anesthesia technique to manage postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery. However, the 90% minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of local anesthetics for posterior QLB remains undetermined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a double-blind, comparative dose-finding study involving 54 women scheduled for elective laparoscopic myomectomy under general anesthesia. Each patient received a bilateral posterior QLB with 20 mL of ropivacaine on each side. The concentration administered varied for each patient and was determined based on the response of the previous participant. The initial concentration was set at 0.20%. Upon successful block, the subsequent patient was assigned to receive either the same (probability of 0.89) or a 0.05% lower concentration (probability of 0.11). In cases of block failure, the concentration was increased by 0.05% for the next patient. The trial concluded when 45 successful blocks were achieved, with block success defined as a pain score of three or fewer 30 minutes after arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 90% minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of ropivacaine was 0.340% (95% CI 0.329 to 0.344%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimal concentration of ropivacaine for posterior QLB to achieve satisfactory analgesia following laparoscopic myomectomy is a 20 ml volume of 0.340% ropivacaine per side.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200055743.</p>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has gained traction as a regional anesthesia technique to manage postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery. However, the 90% minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of local anesthetics for posterior QLB remains undetermined.

Methods: We conducted a double-blind, comparative dose-finding study involving 54 women scheduled for elective laparoscopic myomectomy under general anesthesia. Each patient received a bilateral posterior QLB with 20 mL of ropivacaine on each side. The concentration administered varied for each patient and was determined based on the response of the previous participant. The initial concentration was set at 0.20%. Upon successful block, the subsequent patient was assigned to receive either the same (probability of 0.89) or a 0.05% lower concentration (probability of 0.11). In cases of block failure, the concentration was increased by 0.05% for the next patient. The trial concluded when 45 successful blocks were achieved, with block success defined as a pain score of three or fewer 30 minutes after arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit.

Results: The 90% minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of ropivacaine was 0.340% (95% CI 0.329 to 0.344%).

Conclusions: The optimal concentration of ropivacaine for posterior QLB to achieve satisfactory analgesia following laparoscopic myomectomy is a 20 ml volume of 0.340% ropivacaine per side.

Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200055743.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Virtual reality for reduction of intraprocedural pharmacological sedation and analgesia in adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery associated with perioperative gut microbiota dysbiosis: Evidence from human and antibiotic-treated mouse model. Change in femoral artery pulsatility index as a novel predictor of post-spinal anesthesia hypotension in adult patients undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries: A prospective observational study. Therapeutic novelties in acute heart failure and practical perspectives. Preoperative posterior quadratus lumborum block: Determining the minimum effective ropivacaine concentration in 90% of patients (MEC90) for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic myomectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1