An audit of completeness of Road to Health Booklet at a community health centre in South Africa.

Pfunzo Machimana, Suzan L N Nyalunga, Edith N Madela-Mntla, Doudou K Nzaumvila
{"title":"An audit of completeness of Road to Health Booklet at a community health centre in South Africa.","authors":"Pfunzo Machimana, Suzan L N Nyalunga, Edith N Madela-Mntla, Doudou K Nzaumvila","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> For continuity and quality of care, accurate record-keeping is crucial. Complete care is facilitated by completing a child's Road to Health Booklet (RTHB) as well as prompt interpretation and appropriate action. This could result in a decrease in child morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> The study was aimed at assessing the completeness of the RTHB of children younger than 5 years.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Temba Community Health Centre (CHC), Tshwane District, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A cross-sectional study was conducted using a data collection sheet adopted from previous studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Children less than 1-year-old accounted for 70.2% of the 255 RTHBs. The mean ± s.d. age was 11.5 ±10.76 months. The study finding showed no section was 100% fully completed. Of the 255 records studied, 38 (14.9%) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-exposed babies were recorded at birth, 39.5% were negative at 6 weeks and 60.5% were not recorded. Ninety-one (35.7%) children were unexposed. The HIV status of 126 (49.4%) children was not recorded. Sixty-six per cent (66%) of recorded maternal syphilis was negative. Immunisations, weight-for-age, neonatal information, and details of the family and child were fully completed in 80% of the booklets. Developmental screening was 17.2% completed, and oral health was 1.6% partially completed. The overall completeness was 40.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The completeness of RTHBs was found to be suboptimal.Contribution: The present study's findings should serve as a reminder that healthcare practitioners must complete RTHBs in their totality in order to improve continuity and care quality, as the results indicated that RTHB completion was below ideal.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"e1-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  For continuity and quality of care, accurate record-keeping is crucial. Complete care is facilitated by completing a child's Road to Health Booklet (RTHB) as well as prompt interpretation and appropriate action. This could result in a decrease in child morbidity and mortality.

Aim:  The study was aimed at assessing the completeness of the RTHB of children younger than 5 years.

Setting:  Temba Community Health Centre (CHC), Tshwane District, South Africa.

Methods:  A cross-sectional study was conducted using a data collection sheet adopted from previous studies.

Results:  Children less than 1-year-old accounted for 70.2% of the 255 RTHBs. The mean ± s.d. age was 11.5 ±10.76 months. The study finding showed no section was 100% fully completed. Of the 255 records studied, 38 (14.9%) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-exposed babies were recorded at birth, 39.5% were negative at 6 weeks and 60.5% were not recorded. Ninety-one (35.7%) children were unexposed. The HIV status of 126 (49.4%) children was not recorded. Sixty-six per cent (66%) of recorded maternal syphilis was negative. Immunisations, weight-for-age, neonatal information, and details of the family and child were fully completed in 80% of the booklets. Developmental screening was 17.2% completed, and oral health was 1.6% partially completed. The overall completeness was 40.3%.

Conclusion:  The completeness of RTHBs was found to be suboptimal.Contribution: The present study's findings should serve as a reminder that healthcare practitioners must complete RTHBs in their totality in order to improve continuity and care quality, as the results indicated that RTHB completion was below ideal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对南非一家社区保健中心《健康之路》小册子的完整性进行审计。
背景:为了护理的连续性和质量,准确的记录保存是至关重要的。完成《儿童健康之路》小册子以及及时的解释和适当的行动,有助于全面照顾儿童。这可能导致儿童发病率和死亡率的下降。目的:本研究旨在评估5岁以下儿童RTHB的完整性。地点:南非Tshwane区的Temba社区卫生中心。方法:采用以往研究资料收集表进行横断面研究。结果:1岁以下儿童占255例rthb的70.2%。平均±sd年龄为11.5±10.76个月。研究结果显示,没有一个部分是100%完全完成的。在研究的255个记录中,38个(14.9%)暴露于人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的婴儿在出生时被记录,39.5%在6周时呈阴性,60.5%未被记录。91名(35.7%)儿童未暴露。126名(49.4%)儿童未记录艾滋病毒感染状况。66%的产妇梅毒检测结果为阴性。免疫接种、年龄体重、新生儿信息以及家庭和儿童的详细信息在80%的小册子中得到了完整的填写。发育筛查完成17.2%,口腔健康部分完成1.6%。总体完成度为40.3%。结论:RTHBs的完整性不理想。贡献:本研究的结果应提醒医护人员,为了提高连续性和护理质量,必须全面完成RTHB,因为结果表明RTHB的完成程度低于理想水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum: Evaluating the efficacy of digital media platforms in disseminating public health information: A global review with implications for South Africa. Implementation of malaria control programmes during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Southern African Development Community Elimination 8 countries: A scoping review. Transitioning to midwifery models of care: Implementation insights from focus groups with Health leaders in two African countries. Health services and programmatic responses to improving adolescent HIV care in Lusaka, Zambia: A descriptive qualitative study. Perceptions of Family Medicine among first-year medical students at Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1