[Between Hippocrates and the Oath of Office: Tensions between legal, moral and role expectations with regard to Public Health Service Physician assessments of (future) public servants].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1055/a-2505-2011
Peter Schröder-Bäck, Kerstin Brixius
{"title":"[Between Hippocrates and the Oath of Office: Tensions between legal, moral and role expectations with regard to Public Health Service Physician assessments of (future) public servants].","authors":"Peter Schröder-Bäck, Kerstin Brixius","doi":"10.1055/a-2505-2011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessments in the German Public Health Service take place, among other things, in the recruitment and incapacity assessment of civil servants. This may lead to conflicts of values and norms for assessing doctors, as they have to make decisions that are not necessarily in the interests of the person being assessed. Legally, the expectations of assessing doctors in public administration are largely defined. For public health service physicians, individual normative role conflicts still appear, and questions arise as to whether conscientious decisions of physicians adhere to legal requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2505-2011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessments in the German Public Health Service take place, among other things, in the recruitment and incapacity assessment of civil servants. This may lead to conflicts of values and norms for assessing doctors, as they have to make decisions that are not necessarily in the interests of the person being assessed. Legally, the expectations of assessing doctors in public administration are largely defined. For public health service physicians, individual normative role conflicts still appear, and questions arise as to whether conscientious decisions of physicians adhere to legal requirements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
[Contact-restricting measures in care facilities in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and their impact on residents - a plea]. [Measures to increase the retention of migrant healthcare professionals in Germany: results from 14 years of research]. Prävention von Kinderübergewicht in Kommunen – partizipative Entwicklung von kommunalen Strategien zur Steigerung der Handlungsbereitschaft. Generalisierbarkeit von Phase III Klinischen Studien am Beispiel Zweier Bundesweiter Multiple Sklerose Register. [In times of crisis, utilization of medical services by mothers decreases - Are single mothers affected more?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1