COVID-19 impact on HIV PrEP uptake and retention at selected health facilities in Eswatini.

Musa B Ginindza, Nondumiso Ncube, Renier Coetzee
{"title":"COVID-19 impact on HIV PrEP uptake and retention at selected health facilities in Eswatini.","authors":"Musa B Ginindza, Nondumiso Ncube, Renier Coetzee","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uses antiretroviral medication to reduce HIV risk in HIV-negative individuals. Despite its effectiveness, global uptake faces policy and accessibility challenges. In Eswatini, PrEP introduction in 2017 showed promise despite stigma and COVID-19 disruptions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> This study compared PrEP uptake and retention during and after COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Setting and methods: </strong> An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among clients accessing HIV testing services in selected Eswatini facilities. Data from the HIV testing register, PrEP register, and Client Management Information System (CMIS) were analysed. Uptake, retention, and client outcomes were measured during COVID-19 (March 2020-March 2021) and post-COVID-19 (April 2021-April 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 5286 clients, 45% (n = 2380) initiated PrEP during COVID-19, while 55% (n = 2906) initiated post-pandemic. Facility 3 had the highest initiations during COVID-19 (844), while Facility 5 had the lowest (7). Retention was lower among clients aged 15-29 years. Females initially showed higher retention odds (odds ratio [OR]: 1.50), but this was insignificant after adjusting for confounders. Clients initiated post-COVID-19 had higher retention odds (OR: 2.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> COVID-19 impacted PrEP uptake in Eswatini, emphasising the need for flexible healthcare delivery. Targeted campaigns and tailored interventions are crucial for sustaining HIV prevention efforts and addressing demographic shifts.Contribution: This study highlights the importance of responsive healthcare systems and tailored approaches to maintaining HIV prevention during public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"e1-e6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uses antiretroviral medication to reduce HIV risk in HIV-negative individuals. Despite its effectiveness, global uptake faces policy and accessibility challenges. In Eswatini, PrEP introduction in 2017 showed promise despite stigma and COVID-19 disruptions.

Aim:  This study compared PrEP uptake and retention during and after COVID-19.

Setting and methods:  An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among clients accessing HIV testing services in selected Eswatini facilities. Data from the HIV testing register, PrEP register, and Client Management Information System (CMIS) were analysed. Uptake, retention, and client outcomes were measured during COVID-19 (March 2020-March 2021) and post-COVID-19 (April 2021-April 2022).

Results:  Of 5286 clients, 45% (n = 2380) initiated PrEP during COVID-19, while 55% (n = 2906) initiated post-pandemic. Facility 3 had the highest initiations during COVID-19 (844), while Facility 5 had the lowest (7). Retention was lower among clients aged 15-29 years. Females initially showed higher retention odds (odds ratio [OR]: 1.50), but this was insignificant after adjusting for confounders. Clients initiated post-COVID-19 had higher retention odds (OR: 2.96).

Conclusion:  COVID-19 impacted PrEP uptake in Eswatini, emphasising the need for flexible healthcare delivery. Targeted campaigns and tailored interventions are crucial for sustaining HIV prevention efforts and addressing demographic shifts.Contribution: This study highlights the importance of responsive healthcare systems and tailored approaches to maintaining HIV prevention during public health crises.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病对在斯瓦蒂尼选定卫生机构接受和保留艾滋病毒预防措施的影响
背景:口服暴露前预防(PrEP)使用抗逆转录病毒药物来降低HIV阴性个体的HIV风险。尽管有效,但全球吸收面临政策和可及性方面的挑战。在斯瓦蒂尼,尽管有耻辱和COVID-19的破坏,2017年引入预防措施显示出了希望。目的:本研究比较了COVID-19期间和之后PrEP的摄取和保留情况。环境和方法:在选定的斯瓦蒂尼设施接受艾滋病毒检测服务的客户中进行了一项分析性横断面研究。分析了来自HIV检测登记、PrEP登记和客户管理信息系统(CMIS)的数据。在COVID-19期间(2020年3月至2021年3月)和COVID-19后(2021年4月至2022年4月)测量了吸收、保留和客户结果。结果:在5286名患者中,45% (n = 2380)在COVID-19期间开始PrEP,而55% (n = 2906)在大流行后开始PrEP。新冠肺炎期间,设施3的入会人数最多(844人),而设施5的入会人数最少(7人)。15-29岁客户的入会人数较低。女性最初表现出较高的保留率(比值比[OR]: 1.50),但在调整混杂因素后,这一优势不显著。新冠肺炎后启动的客户保留率更高(OR: 2.96)。结论:COVID-19影响了斯瓦蒂尼PrEP的使用,强调了灵活医疗服务的必要性。有针对性的运动和有针对性的干预措施对于维持艾滋病毒预防工作和应对人口变化至关重要。贡献:本研究强调了在公共卫生危机期间保持艾滋病毒预防的响应性卫生保健系统和量身定制的方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum: Evaluating the efficacy of digital media platforms in disseminating public health information: A global review with implications for South Africa. Implementation of malaria control programmes during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Southern African Development Community Elimination 8 countries: A scoping review. Transitioning to midwifery models of care: Implementation insights from focus groups with Health leaders in two African countries. Health services and programmatic responses to improving adolescent HIV care in Lusaka, Zambia: A descriptive qualitative study. Perceptions of Family Medicine among first-year medical students at Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1