[Health Economic Benefit Analysis of ENT Centers: Simulation-based analysis of centralization in laryngeal surgery using population data from Schleswig-Holstein, exemplified by laryngeal carcinoma].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1055/a-2522-5745
Simon Bettin, Marco Müller, Ines Weinhold, Leonie Zetzsch, Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage, Christian Elsner
{"title":"[Health Economic Benefit Analysis of ENT Centers: Simulation-based analysis of centralization in laryngeal surgery using population data from Schleswig-Holstein, exemplified by laryngeal carcinoma].","authors":"Simon Bettin, Marco Müller, Ines Weinhold, Leonie Zetzsch, Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage, Christian Elsner","doi":"10.1055/a-2522-5745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The health economic impacts of centralization in the German healthcare system, particularly in the field of ENT, are insufficiently researched. Therefore, this study investigates the potential benefits of a head and neck tumor center using the example of surgical care for laryngeal carcinoma in Schleswig-Holstein.A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA search schema to examine the correlation between a hospital's treatment volume and mortality rates for laryngeal carcinomas. Subsequently, an 8-year Markov model simulation was employed to demonstrate the effects of establishing centers. This was supplemented by a cost analysis based on data from the PROGNOS study.The simulation shows the hypothetical impact on patient care for the existing head and neck tumor center in Schleswig-Holstein over an 8-year period. Maintaining the center in Schleswig-Holstein over eight years would save 113 lives and gain 1,333 life years (equivalent to 933.1 QALYs), corresponding to costs of 12,866 euros per QALY.The results suggest that centralizing care has medical and economic effectiveness in the ENT sector. They provide important insights for current political discussions and decision-making processes in healthcare. Future research should expand the focus to include other ENT cancers to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the impacts of centralization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"777-784"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2522-5745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The health economic impacts of centralization in the German healthcare system, particularly in the field of ENT, are insufficiently researched. Therefore, this study investigates the potential benefits of a head and neck tumor center using the example of surgical care for laryngeal carcinoma in Schleswig-Holstein.A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA search schema to examine the correlation between a hospital's treatment volume and mortality rates for laryngeal carcinomas. Subsequently, an 8-year Markov model simulation was employed to demonstrate the effects of establishing centers. This was supplemented by a cost analysis based on data from the PROGNOS study.The simulation shows the hypothetical impact on patient care for the existing head and neck tumor center in Schleswig-Holstein over an 8-year period. Maintaining the center in Schleswig-Holstein over eight years would save 113 lives and gain 1,333 life years (equivalent to 933.1 QALYs), corresponding to costs of 12,866 euros per QALY.The results suggest that centralizing care has medical and economic effectiveness in the ENT sector. They provide important insights for current political discussions and decision-making processes in healthcare. Future research should expand the focus to include other ENT cancers to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the impacts of centralization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州人口数据的基于模拟的喉癌中心效应分析。
集中在德国医疗保健系统的健康经济影响,特别是在耳鼻喉科领域,还没有充分的研究。因此,本研究以石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州喉癌手术治疗为例,探讨头颈部肿瘤中心的潜在益处。使用PRISMA检索模式进行了系统的文献综述,以检查医院的治疗量与喉癌死亡率之间的相关性。随后,采用8年的马尔可夫模型模拟验证了建立中心的效果。这是基于PROGNOS研究数据的成本分析的补充。模拟显示了石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因现有头颈部肿瘤中心在8年期间对患者护理的假设影响。在石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因维持该中心8年,将挽救113条生命,增加1333个生命年(相当于933.1个QALY),相当于每个QALY的成本为12,866欧元。结果表明,集中护理在耳鼻喉科具有医疗效益和经济效益。它们为当前医疗保健领域的政治讨论和决策过程提供了重要见解。未来的研究应扩大重点,包括其他耳鼻喉癌,以获得更全面的了解集中化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
[Impact of the amendment to the AMNOG guidelines by the GKV-FinStG on the benefit assessments of the G-BA]. [Prevention and prediction of food allergies on Instagram: a systematic evaluation]. [How accessible are German hospitals? A secondary data analysis of the 2019 structured quality reports]. [The greatest potential for reducing the workload of physicians through digital care applications (DiPAs) lies within the age group of 50 to 65 years]. [Comprehensibility of the HLS-EU-Q tool for assessing health literacy of long-term unemployed individuals: A qualitative study using the think-aloud method].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1