Changes in doxylamine-pyridoxine dispensation in Ontario following media attention: Time-series analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Canadian Family Physician Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.46747/cfp.710143
Shanzeh Chaudhry, Setayesh Yazdani, Cherry Chu, Shenthuraan Tharmarajah, Nav Persaud, Mina Tadrous
{"title":"Changes in doxylamine-pyridoxine dispensation in Ontario following media attention: Time-series analysis.","authors":"Shanzeh Chaudhry, Setayesh Yazdani, Cherry Chu, Shenthuraan Tharmarajah, Nav Persaud, Mina Tadrous","doi":"10.46747/cfp.710143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the possible association between media coverage and changes in the dispensation of doxylamine-pyridoxine in Canada.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional time-series analysis using data from the IQVIA CompuScript database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ten Canadian provinces.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Family physicians, general practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Data on the estimated total volume of doxylamine-pyridoxine prescriptions dispensed by retail pharmacists in Ontario and across Canada between July 2016 and May 2022 were used for a time-series analysis. Birth data obtained from Statistics Canada were used to adjust for pregnancy rates. Finally, the possible impact of media coverage in January 2018 on doxylamine-pyridoxine use was assessed with interventional autoregressive integrated moving average modelling, and dispensation rates of doxylamine-pyridoxine were reported overall and by prescriber specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Doxylamine-pyridoxine dispensation decreased by 1.2% (<i>P</i>=.015) overall in Ontario but did not change significantly (<i>P</i>=.064) across the rest of Canada. Out of 619,720 total doxylamine-pyridoxine prescriptions dispensed, 391,722 (63.2%) prescriptions were written by family physicians or general practitioners in Ontario, and there was a decline of 2.4% (<i>P</i>=.010) in the dispensation of doxylamine-pyridoxine based on prescriptions written by this group that lasted for 6 months before returning to previous dispensation rates. There was no significant change in the dispensation of doxylamine-pyridoxine based on prescriptions written by obstetrician-gynecologists (decline of 0.5%, <i>P</i>=.235) in Ontario.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite nationwide media attention questioning the efficacy of doxylamine-pyridoxine in early 2018, trends in dispensation rates of doxylamine-pyridoxine were only modestly affected and only in Ontario. Within Ontario, a small but significant reduction in doxylamine-pyridoxine dispensations was noted based on prescriptions from family physicians or general practitioners but not based on those written by obstetrician-gynecologists. Factors associated with the ongoing use of doxylamine-pyridoxine despite evidence of lack of benefit require further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":55288,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Family Physician","volume":"71 1","pages":"43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Family Physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.710143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand the possible association between media coverage and changes in the dispensation of doxylamine-pyridoxine in Canada.

Design: Cross-sectional time-series analysis using data from the IQVIA CompuScript database.

Setting: Ten Canadian provinces.

Participants: Family physicians, general practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Main outcome measures: Data on the estimated total volume of doxylamine-pyridoxine prescriptions dispensed by retail pharmacists in Ontario and across Canada between July 2016 and May 2022 were used for a time-series analysis. Birth data obtained from Statistics Canada were used to adjust for pregnancy rates. Finally, the possible impact of media coverage in January 2018 on doxylamine-pyridoxine use was assessed with interventional autoregressive integrated moving average modelling, and dispensation rates of doxylamine-pyridoxine were reported overall and by prescriber specialty.

Results: Doxylamine-pyridoxine dispensation decreased by 1.2% (P=.015) overall in Ontario but did not change significantly (P=.064) across the rest of Canada. Out of 619,720 total doxylamine-pyridoxine prescriptions dispensed, 391,722 (63.2%) prescriptions were written by family physicians or general practitioners in Ontario, and there was a decline of 2.4% (P=.010) in the dispensation of doxylamine-pyridoxine based on prescriptions written by this group that lasted for 6 months before returning to previous dispensation rates. There was no significant change in the dispensation of doxylamine-pyridoxine based on prescriptions written by obstetrician-gynecologists (decline of 0.5%, P=.235) in Ontario.

Conclusion: Despite nationwide media attention questioning the efficacy of doxylamine-pyridoxine in early 2018, trends in dispensation rates of doxylamine-pyridoxine were only modestly affected and only in Ontario. Within Ontario, a small but significant reduction in doxylamine-pyridoxine dispensations was noted based on prescriptions from family physicians or general practitioners but not based on those written by obstetrician-gynecologists. Factors associated with the ongoing use of doxylamine-pyridoxine despite evidence of lack of benefit require further research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
媒体关注后安大略省多西胺-吡哆醇分配的变化:时间序列分析。
目的:了解媒体报道与加拿大多西胺-吡哆醇配售变化之间的可能关联。设计:使用来自IQVIA CompuScript数据库的数据进行横断面时间序列分析。背景:加拿大的十个省份。研究对象:家庭医生、全科医生和妇产科医生。主要结局指标:使用2016年7月至2022年5月期间安大略省和加拿大各地零售药剂师分发的多西胺-吡哆醇处方的估计总量数据进行时间序列分析。从加拿大统计局获得的出生数据被用来调整怀孕率。最后,采用介入性自回归综合移动平均模型评估2018年1月媒体报道对多西胺-吡哆醇使用的可能影响,并按处方医师专业报告多西胺-吡哆醇的总体配药率。结果:Doxylamine-pyridoxine配药在安大略省总体下降了1.2% (P= 0.015),但在加拿大其他地区没有显著变化(P= 0.064)。在共发放的619,720张多西胺-吡哆醇处方中,安大略省家庭医生或全科医生开具的处方有391,722张(63.2%),该组处方持续6个月后恢复到以前的配药率,多西胺-吡哆醇配药率下降了2.4% (P= 0.010)。在安大略省,根据妇产科医生开具的处方,多西胺-吡哆醇的配药情况没有显著变化(下降0.5%,P= 0.235)。结论:尽管2018年初全国媒体关注多西胺-吡哆醇的疗效,但多西胺-吡哆醇的配药率趋势仅受到轻微影响,且仅在安大略省受到影响。在安大略省,根据家庭医生或全科医生的处方,而不是根据妇产科医生的处方,注意到多西胺-吡哆醇配剂的减少幅度虽小但意义重大。尽管有证据表明多西胺-吡哆醇缺乏益处,但与持续使用多西胺-吡哆醇相关的因素需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Family Physician
Canadian Family Physician 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: Canadian Family Physician (CFP), a peer-reviewed medical journal, is the official publication of the College of Family Physicians of Canada. Our mission is to ensure that practitioners, researchers, educators and policy makers are informed on current issues and in touch with the latest thinking in the discipline of family medicine; to serve family physicians in all types of practice in every part of Canada in both official languages; to advance the continuing development of family medicine as a discipline; and to contribute to the ongoing improvement of patient care.
期刊最新文献
2025 update of the Greig Health Record: Part 2-what's controversial? Ian McWhinney and the doctor-patient relationship: Part 2 of the 10-part series, "Foundations for tomorrow". Anti-Black racism in Canadian clinical tools: Ending race-based correction. Care of the elderly: A missed opportunity in Canadian family medicine training? Advanced therapy in familial hypercholesterolemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1