NIPT Integration as a Patient-Paid Prenatal Screening Option-Observations and Challenges from a Bulgarian Genetic Counseling Center.

Dinnar Yahya, Mari Hachmeriyan, Milena Stoyanova, Mariya Levkova
{"title":"NIPT Integration as a Patient-Paid Prenatal Screening Option-Observations and Challenges from a Bulgarian Genetic Counseling Center.","authors":"Dinnar Yahya, Mari Hachmeriyan, Milena Stoyanova, Mariya Levkova","doi":"10.3390/medsci13010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: NIPT is a widely implemented method for prenatal screening of chromosomal disorders. Its introduction initiated the practice of counseling women pre- and post-analytically. Since the test's usage is established in different conditions, comparing data from various socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds would be of scientific value. Our study is the first to describe NIPT integration in Bulgaria. We aimed to evaluate current trends in demand and referral, the frequency of high-risk results, cases of fetal sex discrepancies and their impacts, as well as commonly held misconceptions during genetic counseling. We also address issues and necessary general prophylaxis and prenatal care improvements. <i>Methods</i>: We performed a retrospective analysis on the pregnant women who received GC for NIPT in our genetic center between 2016 and 2023. We separated this period into two due to a significant difference in the test's price. A total of 635 women were included with their referral indications, panel width preference, fetal sex, and SCA. We assessed cases of fetal sex discrepancy, high-risk pregnancies, late NIPT (after GW 18), and commonly occurring issues and misconceptions. <i>Results</i>: We observed a significant increase in the demand for NIPT-63 women for 2016-2020 versus 572 for 2021-2023. The leading indications were supervision of normal pregnancy (50.4%) and advanced maternal age (>35 years) (31.2%). As for late NIPT, the most common indications for this late testing were high risk from a maternal serum screening test (33.3%) and anxiety (25%). Further, 1.1% of results were high-risk for trisomy 18 and 21 and monosomy X. We reviewed two cases of fetal sex discrepancy (0.3%) and common misconceptions twice more during pre-test GC. <i>Conclusions</i>: This single-center experience shows that demand for NIPT is exponentially growing, especially as a normal pregnancy screening method. Delivering thorough education to the community and guaranteeing outstanding care during genetic counseling sessions is crucial for fostering informed decisions and overall well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: NIPT is a widely implemented method for prenatal screening of chromosomal disorders. Its introduction initiated the practice of counseling women pre- and post-analytically. Since the test's usage is established in different conditions, comparing data from various socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds would be of scientific value. Our study is the first to describe NIPT integration in Bulgaria. We aimed to evaluate current trends in demand and referral, the frequency of high-risk results, cases of fetal sex discrepancies and their impacts, as well as commonly held misconceptions during genetic counseling. We also address issues and necessary general prophylaxis and prenatal care improvements. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on the pregnant women who received GC for NIPT in our genetic center between 2016 and 2023. We separated this period into two due to a significant difference in the test's price. A total of 635 women were included with their referral indications, panel width preference, fetal sex, and SCA. We assessed cases of fetal sex discrepancy, high-risk pregnancies, late NIPT (after GW 18), and commonly occurring issues and misconceptions. Results: We observed a significant increase in the demand for NIPT-63 women for 2016-2020 versus 572 for 2021-2023. The leading indications were supervision of normal pregnancy (50.4%) and advanced maternal age (>35 years) (31.2%). As for late NIPT, the most common indications for this late testing were high risk from a maternal serum screening test (33.3%) and anxiety (25%). Further, 1.1% of results were high-risk for trisomy 18 and 21 and monosomy X. We reviewed two cases of fetal sex discrepancy (0.3%) and common misconceptions twice more during pre-test GC. Conclusions: This single-center experience shows that demand for NIPT is exponentially growing, especially as a normal pregnancy screening method. Delivering thorough education to the community and guaranteeing outstanding care during genetic counseling sessions is crucial for fostering informed decisions and overall well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Is Artificial Intelligence the Next Co-Pilot for Primary Care in Diagnosing and Recommending Treatments for Depression? Circulating microRNAs as Biomarkers of Various Forms of Epilepsy. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Resistance, Virulence and Regulation Genes in Extremely Resistant Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Impact of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Patient Outcomes in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema Within Physician-Led Prehospital Care. Long-Term Management of Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome: Efficacy and Challenges of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy-A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1