The CRP/PAB ratio outperforms the LRINEC score in early diagnosis of Fournier's gangrene

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100267
Jin-Liang Zhu, Hong-Jian Gao, Zhi-Tao Yin
{"title":"The CRP/PAB ratio outperforms the LRINEC score in early diagnosis of Fournier's gangrene","authors":"Jin-Liang Zhu,&nbsp;Hong-Jian Gao,&nbsp;Zhi-Tao Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fournier's gangrene (FG) is scarce and potentially fatal disease. Although the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was established in 2004, its reliability as a diagnostic tool to differentiate between FG and perianal abscess is still debated. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of the LRINEC score and other relevant inflammatory markers. The diagnostic effectiveness of these inflammatory factors was evaluated and compared.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective observational study of patients with FG or with perianal abscess. Fifty-two patients with FG and 39 patients with perianal abscess treated in Shenyang Coloproctology Hospital between January 2019 and December 2023 were enrolled in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The area under the ROC curve (C-statistic) of a LRINEC score ≥6 for diagnosing FG was 0.736. Inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), prealbumin (PAB), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII), demonstrated better diagnostic ability compared to the LRINEC score. Particularly, the compound inflammatory factor of CRP-to-PAB (CRP/PAB) ratio exhibited superior diagnostic ability compared to other markers (C-statistic: 0.908; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The LRINEC score demonstrated only modest discriminative performance in this study. Patients with PAB&lt; 91mg/L and a CRP/PAB≥ 1.52 should undergo careful evaluation for the presence of FG. The elevated CRP/PAB ratio is considered an early indicator for FG, particularly in distinguishing it from deep perianal abscesses. Further investigation is warranted in future studies to support these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fournier's gangrene (FG) is scarce and potentially fatal disease. Although the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was established in 2004, its reliability as a diagnostic tool to differentiate between FG and perianal abscess is still debated. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of the LRINEC score and other relevant inflammatory markers. The diagnostic effectiveness of these inflammatory factors was evaluated and compared.

Methods

Retrospective observational study of patients with FG or with perianal abscess. Fifty-two patients with FG and 39 patients with perianal abscess treated in Shenyang Coloproctology Hospital between January 2019 and December 2023 were enrolled in the study.

Results

The area under the ROC curve (C-statistic) of a LRINEC score ≥6 for diagnosing FG was 0.736. Inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), prealbumin (PAB), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII), demonstrated better diagnostic ability compared to the LRINEC score. Particularly, the compound inflammatory factor of CRP-to-PAB (CRP/PAB) ratio exhibited superior diagnostic ability compared to other markers (C-statistic: 0.908; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The LRINEC score demonstrated only modest discriminative performance in this study. Patients with PAB< 91mg/L and a CRP/PAB≥ 1.52 should undergo careful evaluation for the presence of FG. The elevated CRP/PAB ratio is considered an early indicator for FG, particularly in distinguishing it from deep perianal abscesses. Further investigation is warranted in future studies to support these findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CRP/PAB比值在早期诊断富尼耶坏疽方面优于LRINEC评分。
背景:富尼耶坏疽是一种罕见且具有潜在致命性的疾病。尽管坏死性筋膜炎实验室风险指标(LRINEC)评分于2004年建立,但其作为鉴别FG和肛周脓肿的诊断工具的可靠性仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估LRINEC评分和其他相关炎症标志物的可靠性。对这些炎症因子的诊断效果进行评价和比较。方法:回顾性观察FG或肛周脓肿患者。研究纳入2019年1月至2023年12月在沈阳直肠科医院治疗的52例FG患者和39例肛周脓肿患者。结果:LRINEC评分≥6分诊断FG的ROC曲线下面积(C-statistic)为0.736。炎症标志物,包括c反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)、白蛋白前(PAB)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII),与LRINEC评分相比,显示出更好的诊断能力。其中,CRP-to-PAB复合炎症因子(CRP/PAB)比的诊断能力优于其他指标(C-statistic: 0.908;P < 0.001)。结论:LRINEC评分在本研究中仅表现出适度的区分表现。PAB患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence for surgical care in war-torn sudan: Feasibility, barriers, and ethical perspectives from a conflict zone. Comment on “Predictors of post-operative complications following thyroid surgeries at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania” The textbook outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in a high-volume centre Associations between obesity and lymph node metastasis and early recurrence in pancreatic head cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study Pressure trends and diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1