Surgical sharp debridement alongside maggot debridement therapy (MDT) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs): A systematic review of case reports

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100270
Babak Choobi Anzali , Anna Javanbakht , Maryam Rasouli , Nasim Talebiazar , Milad Hashemzadeh , Mir Amir Hossein Seyed Nazari
{"title":"Surgical sharp debridement alongside maggot debridement therapy (MDT) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs): A systematic review of case reports","authors":"Babak Choobi Anzali ,&nbsp;Anna Javanbakht ,&nbsp;Maryam Rasouli ,&nbsp;Nasim Talebiazar ,&nbsp;Milad Hashemzadeh ,&nbsp;Mir Amir Hossein Seyed Nazari","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this systematic review of case reports is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining surgical sharp debridement with maggot debridement therapy (MDT) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported on the use of surgical sharp debridement alongside MDT for DFUs, while exclusion criteria included insufficient detail on treatment methods or patient outcomes, non-human studies, and non-English publications. Data were extracted using a standardized form, and the quality of case reports was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to the anticipated heterogeneity of the case reports, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review process began with 1003 records, which were narrowed down to 721 unique records after removing duplicates. Following title and abstract screening, and full-text assessment, 8 studies were selected for inclusion in the final analysis. The narrative synthesis identified several key findings, including significant wound size reduction, improved glycemic control, disappearance of foul odor, improved healing rates, infection control, granulation tissue formation, epithelialization, complete wound closure, avoidance of amputation, and pain alleviation. The combination therapy showed promise in managing DFUs effectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The systematic review of case reports presents evidence supporting the combined use of surgical sharp debridement and maggot debridement therapy in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. The findings suggest that this approach can lead to successful wound healing and limb preservation, offering a valuable addition to the clinician's toolkit for treating DFUs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this systematic review of case reports is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining surgical sharp debridement with maggot debridement therapy (MDT) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported on the use of surgical sharp debridement alongside MDT for DFUs, while exclusion criteria included insufficient detail on treatment methods or patient outcomes, non-human studies, and non-English publications. Data were extracted using a standardized form, and the quality of case reports was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to the anticipated heterogeneity of the case reports, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the findings.

Results

The review process began with 1003 records, which were narrowed down to 721 unique records after removing duplicates. Following title and abstract screening, and full-text assessment, 8 studies were selected for inclusion in the final analysis. The narrative synthesis identified several key findings, including significant wound size reduction, improved glycemic control, disappearance of foul odor, improved healing rates, infection control, granulation tissue formation, epithelialization, complete wound closure, avoidance of amputation, and pain alleviation. The combination therapy showed promise in managing DFUs effectively.

Conclusion

The systematic review of case reports presents evidence supporting the combined use of surgical sharp debridement and maggot debridement therapy in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. The findings suggest that this approach can lead to successful wound healing and limb preservation, offering a valuable addition to the clinician's toolkit for treating DFUs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术尖锐清创联合蛆清创疗法(MDT)治疗糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs):对病例报告的系统回顾。
目的:本系统回顾病例报告的目的是评估手术尖锐清创联合蛆虫清创治疗糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)的疗效和安全性。方法:在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science等多个数据库中进行综合文献检索。纳入标准是报道在MDT治疗DFUs的同时使用外科尖锐清创的研究,而排除标准包括治疗方法或患者结果的细节不足、非人类研究和非英语出版物。使用标准化表格提取数据,并使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)病例报告关键评估清单评估病例报告的质量。由于预期病例报告的异质性,进行了叙述综合,并进行了敏感性分析以评估结果的稳健性。结果:审查过程从1003条记录开始,在删除重复记录后,将其缩小到721条唯一记录。经过题目、摘要筛选和全文评估,最终选择8项研究纳入最终分析。叙述综合确定了几个关键发现,包括伤口大小显著减小,血糖控制改善,恶臭消失,愈合率提高,感染控制,肉芽组织形成,上皮化,伤口完全闭合,避免截肢和疼痛减轻。联合治疗在有效治疗DFUs方面显示出希望。结论:系统回顾了病例报告,提供了支持手术锐创术和蛆创术联合应用于糖尿病足溃疡治疗的证据。研究结果表明,这种方法可以导致伤口成功愈合和肢体保存,为临床医生治疗DFUs提供了有价值的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
A simulation-based role-reversal training program improves knowledge, skills, and job satisfaction of endovascular scrub nurses Postoperative day 3 biomarkers for risk stratification and prediction of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study Artificial intelligence for surgical care in war-torn sudan: Feasibility, barriers, and ethical perspectives from a conflict zone The impact of body mass index on predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula in relation to pancreatic texture and main pancreatic duct diameter after pancreaticoduodenectomy Commentary on “Predictors of post-operative complications following thyroid surgery at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania”: Clarifying mechanisms and clinical implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1