Analgesic Efficacy of Gabapentin in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.77808
Muteb N Alotaibi, Ohood Y Alasmari, Omar E Elshaer, Ibrahim S Allehaimeed, Hajar A Alharbi, Amal A Alsubaiei, Abdullah M Alharran, Abdulmuhsen Alqallaf, Mohammed Alshammari, Abdullah Alhuwailah, Ahmed F AlFaleh
{"title":"Analgesic Efficacy of Gabapentin in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.","authors":"Muteb N Alotaibi, Ohood Y Alasmari, Omar E Elshaer, Ibrahim S Allehaimeed, Hajar A Alharbi, Amal A Alsubaiei, Abdullah M Alharran, Abdulmuhsen Alqallaf, Mohammed Alshammari, Abdullah Alhuwailah, Ahmed F AlFaleh","doi":"10.7759/cureus.77808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) results from median nerve compression and may lead to significant pain. Surgical management through release is the gold standard approach for severe CTS patients. Gabapentin is used as an analgesic drug, but data on its postoperative effects on pain assessment and safety measures are unclear. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of gabapentin in patients undergoing CTS release surgery. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the effectiveness of gabapentin in patients with CTS release until September 2024. The primary outcome was the assessment of postoperative pain at one, six, 12, and 24 hours by a visual analog scale (VAS). Other specific outcomes were adverse events. Data were pooled as effect sizes (mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR)) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model using Stata/MP 18. Three RCTs comprising 205 patients were included in the pooled meta-analysis. Gabapentin significantly reduced postoperative pain at six, 12, and 24 hours compared to placebo (MD = -0.6, 95% CI: -0.63 to 0.57, p < 0.001; MD = -2.14, 95% CI: -2.18 to -2.1, p < 0.001; and MD = -1.41, 95% CI: -1.82 to -0.99, p < 0.001, respectively). On the other hand, no significant differences were observed regarding other studied outcomes (i.e., safety) between the two groups. This pooled meta-analysis of 205 patients revealed that gabapentin was associated with reduced pain postoperatively at 6, 12, and 24 hours with comparable rates of adverse events compared to placebo. Further RCTs are warranted to validate the current findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 1","pages":"e77808"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) results from median nerve compression and may lead to significant pain. Surgical management through release is the gold standard approach for severe CTS patients. Gabapentin is used as an analgesic drug, but data on its postoperative effects on pain assessment and safety measures are unclear. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of gabapentin in patients undergoing CTS release surgery. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the effectiveness of gabapentin in patients with CTS release until September 2024. The primary outcome was the assessment of postoperative pain at one, six, 12, and 24 hours by a visual analog scale (VAS). Other specific outcomes were adverse events. Data were pooled as effect sizes (mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR)) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model using Stata/MP 18. Three RCTs comprising 205 patients were included in the pooled meta-analysis. Gabapentin significantly reduced postoperative pain at six, 12, and 24 hours compared to placebo (MD = -0.6, 95% CI: -0.63 to 0.57, p < 0.001; MD = -2.14, 95% CI: -2.18 to -2.1, p < 0.001; and MD = -1.41, 95% CI: -1.82 to -0.99, p < 0.001, respectively). On the other hand, no significant differences were observed regarding other studied outcomes (i.e., safety) between the two groups. This pooled meta-analysis of 205 patients revealed that gabapentin was associated with reduced pain postoperatively at 6, 12, and 24 hours with comparable rates of adverse events compared to placebo. Further RCTs are warranted to validate the current findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of Coronary CTA to Triage Patients With Low to Intermediate Risk for CADs in an Acute Care Facility Can Help Lower Healthcare Costs When Compared With the Current Standard of Care: A Retrospective Study. Delayed Diagnosis of a Bilateral Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in an Infant: A Rare Case Presentation. Intermittent Sinus Pause/Asystole in the Setting of Anticholinergic Overdose. Knowledge and Awareness About the Basics of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Saudi Population. Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region Treated With Surgery and Postoperative Radiotherapy: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1