Understanding Staff Needs for Improving End-Of-Life Care in Critical Care Units: A Qualitative Focus Group Analysis and Service Evaluation.

Simon Tavabie, Stephen Pearson, Janet Balabanovic, Anna Batho, Manoj Juj, Priscilla Kastande, Joanne Bennetts, Emily Collis, Tim Bonnici
{"title":"Understanding Staff Needs for Improving End-Of-Life Care in Critical Care Units: A Qualitative Focus Group Analysis and Service Evaluation.","authors":"Simon Tavabie, Stephen Pearson, Janet Balabanovic, Anna Batho, Manoj Juj, Priscilla Kastande, Joanne Bennetts, Emily Collis, Tim Bonnici","doi":"10.1177/10499091251316492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Critical care is a place of frequent death, up to a quarter of those admitted die during admission. Caring for dying people provides many challenges, practically, professionally and personally. The aim of this study was to better understand the perspectives of staff caring for dying people in critical care and identify their priorities for improvement. <b>Method:</b> Three multidisciplinary focus groups of critical care staff at a large central London hospitals trust were facilitated with a semi structured format and digitally transcribed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to extract themes. <b>Results:</b> N = 34 (18 nursing, 7 allied health professionals, 6 medical, 3 clerical/administrative). The five themes were structured as priority statements: \"We need to recognise\" included the subthemes of being \"sick enough to die\" and potential rapid deteriorations in this setting; \"We need to understand\" with subthemes of perspectives on dying and prioritising time for conversations; \"We need to connect\" with subthemes of therapeutic relationship and physical presence; \"We need to collaborate\" with subthemes of critical care working and empowerment, and cross teams working; \"We need support\" with themes of experiencing support and making time to support others. <b>Conclusion:</b> We present an approach to identifying critical care departmental priorities for an end-of-life care improvement programme. The themes extracted will be used to evaluate systems for dying in critical care, aiming to empower staff to provide excellent care every time they look after a dying person. <b>Relevance to Practice:</b> This service evaluation identifies key priorities among critical care staff regarding end-of-life care. The insights can guide service improvements, such as tailored training and enhanced support for staff, to ensure better communication, collaboration, and quality care for patients at the end of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251316492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251316492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Critical care is a place of frequent death, up to a quarter of those admitted die during admission. Caring for dying people provides many challenges, practically, professionally and personally. The aim of this study was to better understand the perspectives of staff caring for dying people in critical care and identify their priorities for improvement. Method: Three multidisciplinary focus groups of critical care staff at a large central London hospitals trust were facilitated with a semi structured format and digitally transcribed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to extract themes. Results: N = 34 (18 nursing, 7 allied health professionals, 6 medical, 3 clerical/administrative). The five themes were structured as priority statements: "We need to recognise" included the subthemes of being "sick enough to die" and potential rapid deteriorations in this setting; "We need to understand" with subthemes of perspectives on dying and prioritising time for conversations; "We need to connect" with subthemes of therapeutic relationship and physical presence; "We need to collaborate" with subthemes of critical care working and empowerment, and cross teams working; "We need support" with themes of experiencing support and making time to support others. Conclusion: We present an approach to identifying critical care departmental priorities for an end-of-life care improvement programme. The themes extracted will be used to evaluate systems for dying in critical care, aiming to empower staff to provide excellent care every time they look after a dying person. Relevance to Practice: This service evaluation identifies key priorities among critical care staff regarding end-of-life care. The insights can guide service improvements, such as tailored training and enhanced support for staff, to ensure better communication, collaboration, and quality care for patients at the end of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inpatient Palliative Care and Healthcare Utilization Among Older Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia (ADRD) and High Risk of Mortality in U.S. Hospitals. End-of-Life Care of Persons with Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias. Analysis of Barriers to Medical Opioid Pain Medication Using the Japanese Version of the Barriers Questionnaire II (JBQ-II): Pharmacists and Nurses Perspective in Japan. Impact of Implementing Serious Illness Conversations Across a Comprehensive Cancer Center Using an Interdisciplinary Approach. Retrospective Analysis of the Integration of Palliative Care Into the Care of Stroke Patients Admitted to a Regional Stroke Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1