The impact of oxidative balance on all-cause and cause-specific mortality in US adults and cancer survivors: evidence from NHANES 2001-2018.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13531-3
Juan Wu, Yingdong Han, Menghui Yao, He Zhao, Zhikai Li, Tiange Xie, Yun Zhang, Xuejun Zeng
{"title":"The impact of oxidative balance on all-cause and cause-specific mortality in US adults and cancer survivors: evidence from NHANES 2001-2018.","authors":"Juan Wu, Yingdong Han, Menghui Yao, He Zhao, Zhikai Li, Tiange Xie, Yun Zhang, Xuejun Zeng","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13531-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oxidative stress is a crucial pathophysiological mechanism in chronic diseases and mortality. While individual oxidative markers have been studied, the comprehensive impact of oxidative balance on mortality risks remains unclear, particularly among cancer survivors. We aimed to investigate the associations of Oxidative Balance Score (OBS) with mortality in both the general population and cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 37,317 adults (52% female) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2018). OBS was calculated based on antioxidant and pro-oxidant exposures and categorized into quartiles. Survey-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios for mortality risks. Restricted cubic spline analyses were performed to examine potential non-linear relationships. Stratified analyses were conducted to further refine the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a mean follow-up of 9.1 years, 5,092 deaths occurred. Compared with the lowest quartile, the highest quartile of total OBS was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.68) and cancer mortality (HR 0.55). Among cancer survivors, similar associations were observed with all-cause mortality (HR 0.66). Component analysis revealed consistent protective effects of antioxidant OBS (HR 0.60 for all-cause mortality), while higher pro-oxidant OBS showed varying associations across mortality causes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher OBS was associated with lower mortality risks, particularly cancer-related mortality, in both the general population and cancer survivors. While antioxidant exposures showed consistent protective effects, the impact of pro-oxidant exposures varied by mortality causes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13531-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oxidative stress is a crucial pathophysiological mechanism in chronic diseases and mortality. While individual oxidative markers have been studied, the comprehensive impact of oxidative balance on mortality risks remains unclear, particularly among cancer survivors. We aimed to investigate the associations of Oxidative Balance Score (OBS) with mortality in both the general population and cancer survivors.

Methods: This study included 37,317 adults (52% female) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2018). OBS was calculated based on antioxidant and pro-oxidant exposures and categorized into quartiles. Survey-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios for mortality risks. Restricted cubic spline analyses were performed to examine potential non-linear relationships. Stratified analyses were conducted to further refine the findings.

Results: During a mean follow-up of 9.1 years, 5,092 deaths occurred. Compared with the lowest quartile, the highest quartile of total OBS was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.68) and cancer mortality (HR 0.55). Among cancer survivors, similar associations were observed with all-cause mortality (HR 0.66). Component analysis revealed consistent protective effects of antioxidant OBS (HR 0.60 for all-cause mortality), while higher pro-oxidant OBS showed varying associations across mortality causes.

Conclusions: Higher OBS was associated with lower mortality risks, particularly cancer-related mortality, in both the general population and cancer survivors. While antioxidant exposures showed consistent protective effects, the impact of pro-oxidant exposures varied by mortality causes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a prognostic prediction model for elderly gastric cancer patients based on oxidative stress biochemical markers. Efficacy and safety of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Incidence and risk of endocrine and metabolic abnormalities linked to PARP inhibitors in solid tumors: a meta-analysis. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI-derived masseter muscle characteristics: a new diagnostic marker in head and neck cancer? The global, regional burden of pancreatic cancer and its attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1