Applying implementation science frameworks to understand why fisherfolk continue or discontinue pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in Uganda: a qualitative analysis.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017368
Simon Mwima, Laura M Bogart, William Musoke, Semei C Mukama, Stella Allupo, Herbert Kadama, Rose Naigino, Barbara Mukasa, Rhoda Kitti Wanyenze
{"title":"Applying implementation science frameworks to understand why fisherfolk continue or discontinue pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in Uganda: a qualitative analysis.","authors":"Simon Mwima, Laura M Bogart, William Musoke, Semei C Mukama, Stella Allupo, Herbert Kadama, Rose Naigino, Barbara Mukasa, Rhoda Kitti Wanyenze","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Uganda, fisherfolk have an HIV prevalence between 15% and 40%, significantly higher than the national average of 5.5%. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in preventing HIV but faces challenges in uptake and continuation among fisherfolk. This study explores factors influencing PrEP continuation and discontinuation among fisherfolk in Uganda using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from two fishing communities near Entebbe, Uganda. One community received enhanced PrEP support (adherence support, educational workshops and check-in calls), while the other received standard healthcare outreach. Forty fisherfolk (20 who continued PrEP and 20 who discontinued PrEP) were interviewed 6 months after initiating PrEP. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, with high inter-rater consistency. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings highlighted several determinants of PrEP continuation and discontinuation across the CFIR domains. Intervention characteristics such as side effects and the pill burden were significant barriers, particularly for women who reported nausea and stomach issues. Individual characteristics revealed that perceived HIV risk influenced PrEP use, with women's decisions often influenced by their partners' behaviours and mobility. However, insufficient information and education, especially among women, led to misunderstandings and discontinuation. Inner-setting factors like mobility issues and the distance to healthcare clinics posed significant barriers exacerbated by the geographical isolation of fishing communities. In the outer setting, high HIV prevalence motivated PrEP initiation, but stigma, particularly the misconception that PrEP is an antiretroviral drug used by people living with HIV, led to discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fisherfolk in Uganda encounter multiple barriers to PrEP continuation, with women facing more significant challenges. Enhanced support strategies are essential for improving PrEP adherence and informing future HIV prevention interventions in high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017368","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In Uganda, fisherfolk have an HIV prevalence between 15% and 40%, significantly higher than the national average of 5.5%. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in preventing HIV but faces challenges in uptake and continuation among fisherfolk. This study explores factors influencing PrEP continuation and discontinuation among fisherfolk in Uganda using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Methods: Participants were recruited from two fishing communities near Entebbe, Uganda. One community received enhanced PrEP support (adherence support, educational workshops and check-in calls), while the other received standard healthcare outreach. Forty fisherfolk (20 who continued PrEP and 20 who discontinued PrEP) were interviewed 6 months after initiating PrEP. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, with high inter-rater consistency. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained.

Results: Findings highlighted several determinants of PrEP continuation and discontinuation across the CFIR domains. Intervention characteristics such as side effects and the pill burden were significant barriers, particularly for women who reported nausea and stomach issues. Individual characteristics revealed that perceived HIV risk influenced PrEP use, with women's decisions often influenced by their partners' behaviours and mobility. However, insufficient information and education, especially among women, led to misunderstandings and discontinuation. Inner-setting factors like mobility issues and the distance to healthcare clinics posed significant barriers exacerbated by the geographical isolation of fishing communities. In the outer setting, high HIV prevalence motivated PrEP initiation, but stigma, particularly the misconception that PrEP is an antiretroviral drug used by people living with HIV, led to discontinuation.

Conclusion: Fisherfolk in Uganda encounter multiple barriers to PrEP continuation, with women facing more significant challenges. Enhanced support strategies are essential for improving PrEP adherence and informing future HIV prevention interventions in high-risk populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用实施科学框架来理解为什么乌干达渔民继续或停止接触前预防艾滋病毒:一项定性分析。
简介:在乌干达,渔民的艾滋病毒感染率在15%至40%之间,明显高于全国5.5%的平均水平。暴露前预防(PrEP)在预防艾滋病毒方面是有效的,但在渔民中接受和继续面临挑战。本研究利用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)探讨了影响乌干达渔民继续和停止预防PrEP的因素。方法:参与者从乌干达恩德培附近的两个渔业社区招募。一个社区得到了加强的PrEP支持(依从性支持、教育研讨会和登记电话),而另一个社区得到了标准的医疗保健外展。在开始PrEP 6个月后,对40名渔民(20名继续PrEP, 20名停止PrEP)进行了访谈。使用定向内容分析对数据进行了分析,具有高度的评分一致性。获得了伦理批准和知情同意。结果:研究结果强调了PrEP在CFIR域中继续和停止的几个决定因素。副作用和药片负担等干预特征是重大障碍,特别是对于报告恶心和胃部问题的妇女。个人特征表明,感知到的艾滋病毒风险影响了PrEP的使用,妇女的决定往往受到其伴侣行为和流动性的影响。但是,信息和教育不足,特别是在妇女中,导致误解和中断。流动性问题和到医疗诊所的距离等内部因素构成了重大障碍,而渔业社区在地理上的孤立又加剧了这些障碍。在外部环境中,高艾滋病毒流行率促使PrEP开始,但耻辱,特别是误解PrEP是艾滋病毒感染者使用的抗逆转录病毒药物,导致停止。结论:乌干达渔民在继续进行PrEP方面遇到了多重障碍,其中妇女面临的挑战更大。加强支持战略对于改善高危人群的PrEP依从性和告知未来的艾滋病毒预防干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Level and determinants of district primary healthcare system technical efficiency in Ghana: two-stage stochastic frontier analysis. Time to diagnosis for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer in Zimbabwe and South Africa: a cross-sectional study. Local systems, local solutions: which factors drive essential medicine availability in public health facilities across Indonesia? Strengthening supply chains for pathogen genomic surveillance in Asia. What will it take to reimagine global health for 10 billion people?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1