Comparison of the two treatment methods in primary hyperparathyroidism due to solitary parathyroid adenoma, Ultrasound-guided percutaneous alcohol ablation vs. parathyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMC Endocrine Disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1186/s12902-025-01836-0
Mohammad Eslamian, Babak Tavakoli, Alireza Firouzfar, Alireza Pouramini, Bijan Iraj, Mohsen Kolahdouzan, Marjan Mansourian
{"title":"Comparison of the two treatment methods in primary hyperparathyroidism due to solitary parathyroid adenoma, Ultrasound-guided percutaneous alcohol ablation vs. parathyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mohammad Eslamian, Babak Tavakoli, Alireza Firouzfar, Alireza Pouramini, Bijan Iraj, Mohsen Kolahdouzan, Marjan Mansourian","doi":"10.1186/s12902-025-01836-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is the third most common endocrine system disorder. Parathyroidectomy (PTx) is the gold standard of care in symptomatic patients. Patients who are not surgical candidates may benefit from percutaneous ethanol ablation, which is a minimally invasive procedure. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PTx vs. PEA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-centered randomized, not-blinded parallel clinical trial in consecutive patients with pHPT treated with percutaneous alcohol ablation (PEA) between January 2020 and November 2021. Patients with a confirmed solitary parathyroid adenoma and a biochemically verified pHPT were randomly enrolled in the PTx or PEA groups. Complications and lab data were evaluated 24 h, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months following interventions. Effectiveness was defined as complete response (normal calcium and PTH), partial response (reduced but not normalized PTH with normal serum calcium), or disease persistence (elevated calcium and PTH). SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The final sample comprised 68 patients in each group which 113 of whom were female (83.0%). Complete response was observed in 91.1% (n = 62) of the PEA group and 98.5% (n = 67) of the PTx group. According to repeated-measures analysis, Calcium, PTH, Phosphorus, and Alkaline phosphatase fell significantly and continuously in each intervention group, except for the persistent patients. According to ROC analysis, a cutoff of > 425.5 mm3 for the adenoma volume and > 13.5 mm for its largest diameter showed a sensitivity = 75% and specificity = 69% for partial response in the PEA group (AUC = 0.81 and 0.84, respectively). PTx group experienced statistically significant higher pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS score) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTH, serum-adjusted Calcium, and adenoma size and volume were all significantly reduced by PTx and PEA, with no significant difference between them. PEA is an effective alternative to PTx, particularly in adenomas with a volume of less than 425.5 mm3 and a maximum diameter of 13.5 mm.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>IRCT20210204050241N1 (04/26/2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01836-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is the third most common endocrine system disorder. Parathyroidectomy (PTx) is the gold standard of care in symptomatic patients. Patients who are not surgical candidates may benefit from percutaneous ethanol ablation, which is a minimally invasive procedure. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PTx vs. PEA.

Method: A single-centered randomized, not-blinded parallel clinical trial in consecutive patients with pHPT treated with percutaneous alcohol ablation (PEA) between January 2020 and November 2021. Patients with a confirmed solitary parathyroid adenoma and a biochemically verified pHPT were randomly enrolled in the PTx or PEA groups. Complications and lab data were evaluated 24 h, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months following interventions. Effectiveness was defined as complete response (normal calcium and PTH), partial response (reduced but not normalized PTH with normal serum calcium), or disease persistence (elevated calcium and PTH). SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis.

Result: The final sample comprised 68 patients in each group which 113 of whom were female (83.0%). Complete response was observed in 91.1% (n = 62) of the PEA group and 98.5% (n = 67) of the PTx group. According to repeated-measures analysis, Calcium, PTH, Phosphorus, and Alkaline phosphatase fell significantly and continuously in each intervention group, except for the persistent patients. According to ROC analysis, a cutoff of > 425.5 mm3 for the adenoma volume and > 13.5 mm for its largest diameter showed a sensitivity = 75% and specificity = 69% for partial response in the PEA group (AUC = 0.81 and 0.84, respectively). PTx group experienced statistically significant higher pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS score) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: PTH, serum-adjusted Calcium, and adenoma size and volume were all significantly reduced by PTx and PEA, with no significant difference between them. PEA is an effective alternative to PTx, particularly in adenomas with a volume of less than 425.5 mm3 and a maximum diameter of 13.5 mm.

Trial registration number: IRCT20210204050241N1 (04/26/2021).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单发甲状旁腺瘤所致原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进两种治疗方法的比较:超声引导下经皮酒精消融与甲状旁腺切除术:一项随机对照试验。
背景:原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(pHPT)是第三大最常见的内分泌系统疾病。甲状旁腺切除术(PTx)是治疗有症状患者的金标准。不适合手术的患者可以从经皮乙醇消融术中获益,这是一种微创手术。本研究旨在评价PTx与PEA的有效性和安全性。方法:在2020年1月至2021年11月期间,对连续接受经皮酒精消融(PEA)治疗的pHPT患者进行单中心随机、非盲平行临床试验。确诊为孤立性甲状旁腺瘤和生物化学证实为pHPT的患者随机分为PTx组或PEA组。在干预后24小时、2周、3个月和6个月评估并发症和实验室数据。有效性定义为完全缓解(钙和甲状旁腺激素正常),部分缓解(血清钙正常,甲状旁腺激素降低但未正常化),或疾病持续(钙和甲状旁腺激素升高)。采用SPSS 22.0进行统计分析。结果:两组共68例,其中女性113例,占83.0%。PEA组91.1% (n = 62)和PTx组98.5% (n = 67)的患者完全缓解。重复测量分析,除持续性患者外,各干预组钙、甲状旁腺激素、磷、碱性磷酸酶均显著且持续下降。根据ROC分析,在PEA组中,腺瘤体积的临界值为> 425.5 mm3,最大直径的临界值为> 13.5 mm,对于部分缓解的敏感性为75%,特异性为69% (AUC分别为0.81和0.84)。结论:PTx组与PEA组患者PTH、血清调节钙、腺瘤大小和体积均明显降低,两者间差异无统计学意义。PEA是PTx的有效替代品,特别是对于体积小于425.5 mm3,最大直径为13.5 mm的腺瘤。试验注册号:IRCT20210204050241N1(04/26/2021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Impact of fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene variants on adult obesity and overweight: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Association of serum uric acid and serum uric acid/creatinine ratio with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in young adults: a retrospective study. The body mass index-glucose index as a new tool for early detection of the risk of dysglycemia in patients with hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Predictive value of three insulin resistance surrogate indices for symptomatic hypoglycemia risk in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. The effect of metabolic bariatric surgery on Anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1