The impact of absorbable hemostatic agents on wound healing in an experimental penile fracture rat model.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BMC Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1186/s12894-025-01697-8
Mehmet Ezer, Engin Doğantekin, Muzaffer Çaydere, Aykut Koç, Çağrı Öktem, Sema Hücümenoğlu
{"title":"The impact of absorbable hemostatic agents on wound healing in an experimental penile fracture rat model.","authors":"Mehmet Ezer, Engin Doğantekin, Muzaffer Çaydere, Aykut Koç, Çağrı Öktem, Sema Hücümenoğlu","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01697-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of two absorbable hemostatic agents, oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) and gelatin sponge, on wound healing in a rat model of penile fracture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 32 Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups: Control (C), Primary Suturing (PS), ORC, and Gelatin Sponge (GS). A penile fracture model was created in all rats, and wound healing was assessed histopathologically after two weeks. Key parameters assessed included primary healing, fibrosis, inflammation, and cavernous tissue healing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ORC group showed significantly higher primary healing rates (100%) compared to the other groups (p < 0.01). Fibrosis was more common in the GS group (87.5%), whereas no fibrosis was observed in the ORC group (p < 0.01). In terms of cavernous tissue healing, the group treated with the ORC absorbable hemostatic agent demonstrated significantly higher healing rates compared to the control group (p = 0.000). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ORC absorbable hemostatic agents significantly promote primary wound healing and reduce fibrosis in an experimental penile fracture model, whereas the gelatin sponge was associated with increased fibrosis and did not improve healing. These findings suggest that ORC may have potential clinical applications in penile fracture repair. Further clinical studies are necessary to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01697-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of two absorbable hemostatic agents, oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) and gelatin sponge, on wound healing in a rat model of penile fracture.

Materials and methods: A total of 32 Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups: Control (C), Primary Suturing (PS), ORC, and Gelatin Sponge (GS). A penile fracture model was created in all rats, and wound healing was assessed histopathologically after two weeks. Key parameters assessed included primary healing, fibrosis, inflammation, and cavernous tissue healing.

Results: The ORC group showed significantly higher primary healing rates (100%) compared to the other groups (p < 0.01). Fibrosis was more common in the GS group (87.5%), whereas no fibrosis was observed in the ORC group (p < 0.01). In terms of cavernous tissue healing, the group treated with the ORC absorbable hemostatic agent demonstrated significantly higher healing rates compared to the control group (p = 0.000). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding inflammation.

Conclusion: ORC absorbable hemostatic agents significantly promote primary wound healing and reduce fibrosis in an experimental penile fracture model, whereas the gelatin sponge was associated with increased fibrosis and did not improve healing. These findings suggest that ORC may have potential clinical applications in penile fracture repair. Further clinical studies are necessary to validate these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
期刊最新文献
Chordee and hooded prepuce with no hypospadias; outcome of urethral preservation surgery with spongioplasty. Monitoring of prostate-specific antigen in men with benign prostate enlargement receiving 5-alpha reductase inhibitors: a non-interventional, cross-sectional study of real-world practice of urologists in Spain and Brazil. Risk factors for renal insufficiency and survival implications after radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy in renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus: a systematic review. Use of erectile dysfunction treatments after prostate cancer treatment and their perceived impact on men's sex life: an analysis of patient reported outcome survey data. Comparison of treatments for preventing lower urinary tract symptoms after BCG immunotherapy of bladder tumors : a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1