Long-term outcome and predictors of vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: Real-world evidence from the Korean national hospital consortium

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2025.107511
Seo-Young Lee , Hyesung Lee , Jae-Wook Cho , Kyung Wook Kang , Jong-Geun Seo , Jon Soo Kim , Joon-Won Kang , Daeyoung Kim , Young-Soo Kim , Sun Ah Choi , Jeonghoon Park , Ji Hoon Phi , Sang Ook Nam , Won Seop Kim , Jae-Moon Kim , Ki Joong Kim , Korean National Hospital Consortium for VNS Outcome Study
{"title":"Long-term outcome and predictors of vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: Real-world evidence from the Korean national hospital consortium","authors":"Seo-Young Lee ,&nbsp;Hyesung Lee ,&nbsp;Jae-Wook Cho ,&nbsp;Kyung Wook Kang ,&nbsp;Jong-Geun Seo ,&nbsp;Jon Soo Kim ,&nbsp;Joon-Won Kang ,&nbsp;Daeyoung Kim ,&nbsp;Young-Soo Kim ,&nbsp;Sun Ah Choi ,&nbsp;Jeonghoon Park ,&nbsp;Ji Hoon Phi ,&nbsp;Sang Ook Nam ,&nbsp;Won Seop Kim ,&nbsp;Jae-Moon Kim ,&nbsp;Ki Joong Kim ,&nbsp;Korean National Hospital Consortium for VNS Outcome Study","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2025.107511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) using real-world data.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We included 189 DRE patients who underwent VNS implantation between 2005 and 2018 at nine national hospitals in Korea. Seizure-frequency data obtained quarterly one year before and after surgery and annually up to four years after surgery were collected from medical records. Health resource utilization trends over the four years preceding and following surgery were assessed through linkage with national health insurance data. We performed interrupted time series analysis to examine the trend in seizure frequency before and after one year following surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The seizure frequency exhibited a decreasing trend in 27.5 % and an increasing trend in 3.8 % during the first year following VNS implantation without a significant change in efficacy over the subsequent three years. Patients with focal spikes with secondary bilateral synchrony (SBS) in electroencephalography had a higher responder rate (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)= 3.06 [1.36–6.90]), whereas those with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome had a lower responder rate (aOR=0.38 [0.15–0.94]). One-year seizure-freedom was achieved in 6.0 % of patients at some point during the four-year follow-up. Over an eight-year period, the number of antiseizure medications (ASMs) tended to increase before surgery and remained at a median of 5 [4−6] after surgery. While the total medical and epilepsy-related costs tended to decrease after surgery, the ASM cost continued to increase.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>VNS was substantially beneficial for one in four patients with DRE, offering the chance of seizure-freedom. However, the efficacy of VNS fell within the efficacy range of recently introduced medical treatments and did not lead to a decrease in the ASM burden. Focal spike with SBS is a potential biomarker for a favorable response to VNS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121125000129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to assess the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) using real-world data.

Method

We included 189 DRE patients who underwent VNS implantation between 2005 and 2018 at nine national hospitals in Korea. Seizure-frequency data obtained quarterly one year before and after surgery and annually up to four years after surgery were collected from medical records. Health resource utilization trends over the four years preceding and following surgery were assessed through linkage with national health insurance data. We performed interrupted time series analysis to examine the trend in seizure frequency before and after one year following surgery.

Results

The seizure frequency exhibited a decreasing trend in 27.5 % and an increasing trend in 3.8 % during the first year following VNS implantation without a significant change in efficacy over the subsequent three years. Patients with focal spikes with secondary bilateral synchrony (SBS) in electroencephalography had a higher responder rate (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)= 3.06 [1.36–6.90]), whereas those with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome had a lower responder rate (aOR=0.38 [0.15–0.94]). One-year seizure-freedom was achieved in 6.0 % of patients at some point during the four-year follow-up. Over an eight-year period, the number of antiseizure medications (ASMs) tended to increase before surgery and remained at a median of 5 [4−6] after surgery. While the total medical and epilepsy-related costs tended to decrease after surgery, the ASM cost continued to increase.

Conclusion

VNS was substantially beneficial for one in four patients with DRE, offering the chance of seizure-freedom. However, the efficacy of VNS fell within the efficacy range of recently introduced medical treatments and did not lead to a decrease in the ASM burden. Focal spike with SBS is a potential biomarker for a favorable response to VNS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
期刊最新文献
Long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed or currently untreated recurrent focal-onset seizures: Results from the open-label extension phase of FREEDOM (Study 342) Neuromodulation Strategies in Lennox‐Gastaut Syndrome: Practical Clinical Guidance from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Epilepsy Arabic renaming to cerebroelectric disorder could minimize the stigma Use of benzodiazepines in patients with status epilepticus requiring second-line antiseizure medication treatment Significant reduction of seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy by vagus nerve stimulation: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1